Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Examining guardianship in action in Waco, Texas

  • Published:
Crime Prevention and Community Safety Aims and scope

Abstract

The guardianship in action (GIA) instrument was originally developed by Reynald (Crime Prev Community Saf 11(1):1–20, 2009) as a tool for measuring guardianship potential at residential properties. This research determined that guardianship intensity at the property level can be measured through direct observation, and the measurement of guardianship intensity is enhanced when measures of aspects of the physical and social environment are included. Guardianship in action has been examined previously in major metropolitan areas and suburban contexts. Research has not examined the utility of the guardianship in action instrument or the related guardianship construct in rural areas, small cities and towns, or smaller non-metropolitan cities. The current study is designed to examine guardianship in action in a smaller, non-metropolitan city—Waco, Texas. Implications for research, theory, and policy are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Block, R., and W.G. Skogan. 1984. The dynamics of violence between strangers: Victim resistance and outcomes in rape, assault, and robbery. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brantingham, P.L., and P.J. Brantingham. 1993. Nodes, paths, and edges: Considerations on the complexity of crime and the physical environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 13(1): 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L.E., and M. Felson. 1979. Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review 44 (4): 588–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eck, J.E. 1994. Drug markets and drug places. Unpublished PhD diss., University of Maryland, College Park, MD.

  • Eck, J.E. 1995. Examining routine activity theory: A review of two books. Justice Quarterly 12(4): 783–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felson, M. 1986. Routine activities, social controls, rational decisions, and criminal outcomes. In The reasoning criminal, ed. D. Cornish and R.V. Clarke, 119–128. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Felson, M. 1995. Those who discourage crime. In Crime and place: Crime prevention studies, vol. 4, ed. J.E. Eck and D. Weisburd, 53–66. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felson, M. 1998. Crime and everyday life, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felson, M., and L.E. Cohen. 1980. Human ecology and crime: A routine activity approach. Human Ecology 8(4): 389–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollis-Peel, M.E., D.M. Reynald, M. van Bavel, H. Elffers, and B.C. Welsh. 2011. Guardianship for crime prevention: A critical review of the literature. Crime, Law, and Social Change 56(1): 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollis, M.E., M. Felson, and B.C. Welsh. 2013. The capable guardian in routine activities theory: A theoretical and conceptual reappraisal. Crime Prevention and Community Safety 15(1): 65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollis-Peel, M.E., D.M. Reynald, and B.C. Welsh. 2012. Guardianship and crime: An international comparative study of guardianship in action. Crime, Law, and Social Change 58(1): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollis-Peel, M.E., and B.C. Welsh. 2014. What makes a guardian capable? A test of guardianship in action. Security Journal 27(3): 320–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moir, E., A. Stewart, D.M. Reynald, and T.C. Hart. 2017. Guardianship in action (GIA) within Brisbane suburbs: Examining the relationship between guardianship intensity and crime, and changes across time. Criminal Justice Review 42(3): 254–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynald, D.M. 2009. Guardianship in action: Developing a new tool for measurement. Crime Prevention and Community Safety 11(1): 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynald, D.M. 2010. Guardians on guardianship: Factors affecting the willingness to supervise, the ability to detect potential offenders, and the willingness to intervene. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 47(3): 358–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, P., T.D. Madensen, and M.S. Tillyer. 2007. Guardianship in context: Implications for burglary victimization risk and prevention. Criminology 45(4): 771–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Texas State University, San Marcos, USA

    Meghan E. Hollis, Danielle M. Fenimore & Monica Caballero

  2. Tarleton State University, Stephenville, USA

    Shannon Hankhouse

Authors
  1. Meghan E. Hollis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Danielle M. Fenimore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Monica Caballero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shannon Hankhouse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meghan E. Hollis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hollis, M.E., Fenimore, D.M., Caballero, M. et al. Examining guardianship in action in Waco, Texas. Crime Prev Community Saf 21, 68–80 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41300-018-0056-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41300-018-0056-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation