Skip to main content
Log in

CSR as a Selling of Indulgences: An Experimental Investigation of Customers’ Perceptions of CSR Activities Depending on Corporate Reputation

  • Published:
Corporate Reputation Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Companies are increasingly investing in CSR whereby companies with a bad reputation are no exception. The study at hand empirically examines customers’ evaluations of corporate credibility as a reaction to companies’ CSR engagement contingent on the firms’ corporate reputation. Drawing from psychological theories on contrast and recency effects, a conceptual framework is derived which proposes that firms with a bad reputation will benefit more from engaging in CSR compared to those with a favorable reputation. The framework is put to test using a large (N = 1,717), cross-industry sample (including evaluations of 71 independent firms from varying industries), and a between-subjects experimental design (CSR info is given versus no CSR info is given). Results confirm that, indeed, whereas companies with a bad reputation significantly benefit from CSR in terms of an increase in corporate credibility, there is no positive effect of CSR for companies with a good reputation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, D.A. (1991) Managing Brand Equity. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, L.S., and West, S.G. (1991) Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariely, D. (1998) ‘Combining experiences over time: The effects of duration, intensity changes and on-line measurements on retrospective pain evaluations’,. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 11, 19–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bae, J. and Cameron, G.T. (2006) ‘Conditioning effect of prior reputation on perception of corporate giving’, Public Relations Review, 32(2), 144–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barich, H. and Kotler, P. (1991) ‘A framework for marketing image management’, Sloan Management Review, 32(2), 94–104.

  • Basil, D.Z. and Weber, D. (2006) ‘Values motivation and concern for appearances: the effect of personality traits on responses to corporate social responsibility’, International Journal of Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Marketing’ 11(1), 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, H., Sujan, M. and Padgett, D. (1997) ‘Patterns of affective reactions to advertisements: the integration of moment-to-moment responses into overall judgments’, Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 219–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker-Olsen, K.L., Cudmore, B.A. and Hill, R.P. (2006) ‘The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior’, Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 46–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T.J. and Dacin, P.A. (1997) ‘The company and the product: corporate associations and consumer product responses’, The Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J.S. (1957) ‘On perceptual readiness’, Psychological Review, 64(2), 123–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, Y., Jo, H. and Pan, C. (2012) ‘Doing well while doing bad? CSR in controversial industry sectors’, Journal of Business Ethics, 108(4), 467–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calfee, J.E. and Ringold, D.J. (1994) ‘The 70% majority: Enduring consumer beliefs about advertising’, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 13(2), 228–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. (1979) ‘A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance’, Academy of Management Review, 4, 497–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. (1991) ‘The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders’, Business Horizons, 34, 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F.-P. and Leu, J.-D. (2011) ‘Product involvement in the link between skepticism toward advertising and its effects’, Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 39(2),153–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creyer, E. and Ross, W.T. (1997) ‘The influence of firm behavior on purchase intention: Do consumers really care about business ethics?’, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 14(6), 421–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawar, N. and Pillutla, M.M. (2000) ‘Impact of product-harm crises on brand equity: The moderating role of consumer expectations’, Journal of Marketing Research, 37(2), 215–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deighton, J. (1984) ‘The interaction of advertising and evidence’, Journal of Consumer Research, 11(3), 763–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, S., Bhattacharya, C.B., and Sen, S. (2007) ‘Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: The role of competitive positioning’, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(3), 224–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, P.S., Webb, D.J., and Mohr, L.A. (2006) ‘Building corporate associations: consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 147–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, P.S., Wiener, J.L. and Cobb-Walgren, C. (1991) ‘The role of perceived consumer effectiveness in motivating environmentally conscious behaviors’, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 10(2), 102–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elving; W.J.L. (2010) CSR and skepticism: The influence of fit and reputation on skepticism towards CSR communications. Conference on Corporate Communication , 2010, 63–78.

  • Erdem, T., Swait, J., and Louviere, J. (2002) ‘The impact of brand credibility on consumer price sensitivity’, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fein, S. and Hilton, J.L. (1994) ‘Judging others in the shadow of suspicion’, Motivation and Emotion, 18(2), 167–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C.J. (1996) Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C.J. (2005) ‘Building corporate reputation through csr initiatives: Evolving standards’, Corporate Reputation Review 8(1), 7–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C.J., Gardberg, N.A., and Sever, J.M. (2000) ‘The reputation quotient: A multi-stakeholder measure of corporate reputation’, Journal of Brand Management, 7, 241–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fooks, G.J., Gilmore, A.B., Smith, K.E., Collin, J., Holden, C. and Lee. K. (2011) ‘Corporate social responsibility and access to policy élites: An analysis of tobacco industry documents’, PLoS Med, 8(8), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forehand, M.R. and Grier, S. (2003) ‘When is honesty the best policy? The effect of stated company intent on consumer skepticism’, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 349–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981) ‘Evaluating structural equation model with unobservable variables and measurement error’, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frynas, J.G. (2005) ‘The false developmental promise of corporate social responsibility: Evidence from multinational oil companies’, International Affairs, 81(3), 581–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, P.C., Merrill, C.B. and Hansen, J.M. (2009) ‘The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis’, Strategic Management Journal, 39, 425–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graafland, J.J. and Smid, H. (2004) ‘Reputation, corporate social responsibility and market regulation’, Tijdschrift voor Economie en Management, 49, 271–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardesty, D.M., Carlson, J.P., and Bearden, W.O. (2002) ‘Brand familiarity and invoice price effects on consumer evaluations: The moderating role of skepticism toward advertising’, Journal of Advertising, 31(2), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harman, H.H. (1976) Modern Factor Analysis. Chicago: IL: University of Chicago Press.

  • Herbig, P, and Milewicz, J. (1993) ‘The relationship of reputation and credibility to brand success’, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 10(3), 18–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillenbrand, C. and Money, K. (2007) ‘Corporate responsibility and corporate reputation: Two separate concepts or two sides of the same coin?’, Corporate Reputation Review, 10(4), 261–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, D.A. and Gavin, M.B. (1998) ‘Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: implications for research in organizations’, Journal of Management 23, 513–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, C., Wieseke, J., and Hoyer, W.D. (2009) Social identity and the service-profit chain. Journal of Marketing, 73, 38–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong. H. and Kacperczyk, M. (2009) ‘The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets’, Journal of Financial Economics 93: 15–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hur, J.-M., Kim, H., and Woo, J. (2014) ‘How CSR leads to corporate brand equity: Mediating mechanisms of corporate brand credibility and reputation’, Journal of Business Ethics, 125, 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, L.R. (1982) ‘Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 219–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979) ‘Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk’, Econometrica 47, 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. and Lee, N. (2005) Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafferty, B.A. and Goldsmith, R.E. (1999) ‘Corporate credibility’s role in consumer’s attitudes and purchase intentions when a high versus a low credibility endorser is used in the Ad’, Journal of Business Research, 44(2), 108–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lii, Y.-S. and Lee, M. (2012) ‘Doing right leads to doing well: When the type of CSR and reputation interact to affect consumer evaluations of the firm’, Journal of Business Ethics 105(1), 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X. and Bhattacharya, C.B. (2006) ‘Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value’, Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L.L., Seta, J.J., and Crelia, R.A. (1990) ‘Assimilation and contrast as a function of people’s willingness and ability to expend effort in forming an impression’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(1), 27–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A. and Siegel, D. (2001) ‘Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective’, Academy of Management Review, 26, 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N. and Campbell, D. (1959) ‘Recency and primacy in persuasion as a function of the timing of speeches and measurements’, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, S.J. and Goldsmith, R.E. (2001) ‘The development of a scale to measure perceived corporate credibility’, Journal of Business Research 52, 235–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obermiller, C. and Spangenberg, E.R. (1998) ‘Development of a scale to measure consumer skepticism toward advertising’, Journal of Consumer Psychology 7(2), 159–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, R.L. (1980) ‘A Cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions’, Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 460–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, R.L. (1997) Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, G.D. and Pracejus, J.W. (2004) ‘Integration of positive and negative affective stimuli’, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(4), 374–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo, G. and Richter, U. (2005) ‘CSR business as usual? the case of the tobacco industry’, Journal of Business Ethics, 61, 387–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y. and Podsakoff, N.P. (2003) ‘Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies’, Journal of Applied Psychology 88(5), 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomering, A. and Johnson, L.W. (2009) ‘Advertising corporate social responsibility initiatives to communicate corporate image: Inhibiting scepticism to enhance persuasion’, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 14(4), 420–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyu, S.-S. (1998) ‘Effects of service quality perceptions on expectations’, Journal of International Marketing and Marketing Research, 38(2), 225–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W. and Bryk, A.S. (2002) Hierarchical linear models (2nd ed). Sage, CA: Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnietz, K.E. and Epstein, M.J. (2005) ‘Exploring the financial value of a reputation for corporate social responsibility during a crisis’, Corporate Reputation Review, 7(4), 327–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S. and Bhattacharya, C.B. (2001) Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility’, Journal of Marketing Research , 38(2), 225–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skarmeas, D. and Leonidou, C.N. (2013) ‘When consumers doubt, watch out! The role of csr skepticism’, Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1831–1838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.E. (1993) ‘Integrating information from advertising and trial: Processes and effects on consumer response to product information’, Jounral of Marketing Research, 30, 204–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, S.S., Anderson, R., and Ponnavolu, K. (2002) ‘Customer loyalty in e-commerce: an exploration of its antecedents and consequences’, Journal of retailing, 78(1), 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahilevitz, M. (2003) ‘The effects of prior impressions of a firm’s ethics on the success of a cause-related marketing campaign: Do the good look better while the bad look worse?’, Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 11(1), 77–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, J. and Swait, J. (2007) The effects of brand credibility on customer loyalty’, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 15,179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varey, C. and Kahneman, D. (1992) ‘Experiences extended across time: Evaluation of moments and episodes’, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 5, 169–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlachos, P.A., Tsamakos, A., Vrechopoulos, A.P., and Avramidis, P.K. (2009) ‘Corporate social responsibility: Attributions, loyalty, and the mediating role of trust’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(2), 170–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wundt, W.M. (1896) Lectures in Human and Animal Psychology. (Trans. J. E. Creighton and E. B. Titchener) London: Swan Sonnenschein.

  • Yoon, Y., Gürhan-Canli, Z. and Schwarz, N. (2006) ‘The effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on companies with bad reputations’. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4), 377–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, V. (1998) ‘The nature and determinants of consumer expectations of service’, Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 21(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Anne-Kathrin Ulke or Laura Marie Schons.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables A and B.

Table A Construct Measures and Standardized Factor Loadings of Applied Scales
Table B Reputation Ratings of Considered Companies

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ulke, AK., Schons, L.M. CSR as a Selling of Indulgences: An Experimental Investigation of Customers’ Perceptions of CSR Activities Depending on Corporate Reputation. Corp Reputation Rev 19, 263–280 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-016-0005-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-016-0005-0

Keywords

Navigation