Abstract
In this paper, we draw on the case of Chinese Model Opera during the Cultural Revolution to demonstrate not only an extreme case of political control over cultural production but to consider the role of the state’s involvement in the consumption side of cultural politics. In addition to a textual analysis of the videos and librettos of 11 Model Operas, we analyze 274 reports and reviews related to Model Operas in the People’s Daily (Renmin Ribao) from the period 1964 to 1976, as well as supplement government documents. Our analysis of Chinese Model Opera extends our theoretical understanding of the potential relationships between political power and culture. Totalitarian regimes that take culture seriously, understanding art as a crucial resource in the reconstruction of society, may expand their involvement to direct not just what type of art is produced, but the conditions of its viewing, interpretation, and evaluation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
“Revolutionary Model works” were designated by The People’s Daily in an editorial of May 25th, 1967, including five revolutionary Peking operas, two revolutionary ballets, and a symphony readapted from one of the revolutionary Peking operas. Model works is the term used to describe all theatrical works produced directly following the guidance of Madame Mao, which are about 18 in total.
Readers could search on YouTube with key words such as “Peking opera,” “Revolutionary Model Opera,” or the opera names listed on "Appendix" to view the opera pieces and have a clearer understanding of what these different kinds of operas look and sound like.
Interestingly, the carefully cultivated impression of collective authorship is challenged after the Cultural Revolution, especially after the Code of Authorship was passed in China in 1990. There have been lawsuits in China around the authorship of the Model Operas since the 2000s, particularly when they are readapted into TV shows or replayed on stage. See for example the lawsuit in 2006 for the authorship of Shajiabang (http://www.chinacourt.org/article/detail/2008/04/id/298965.shtml) and the lawsuit in 2011 for authorship of the Revolutionary ballet Red Detachment of Women (http://www.bjnews.com.cn/ent/2012/05/04/197251.html).
“Model Opera” is a literal translation from the original Chinese “Yang Ban Xi,” first used in flattering reviews in The People’s Daily (Renmin Ribao) and Red Flag (Hongqi) in 1966 to refer to modern revolutionary Peking operas. In the report of Excellent Models of Revolutionary Art in The People’s Daily on May 31, 1967, there were eight staged works being called the “model” of revolutionary art, including 5 modern revolutionary Peking operas, 2 revolutionary ballets, and a symphony. Since then, people usually use “Eight Model Operas” to refer to the staging works produced during the Cultural Revolution under the supervision of Madame Mao, but there were actually 18 of them in total. Some scholars adopt “Model work” instead of “Model Opera” to better encompass various kinds of art forms in these products and use “Model Opera” to refer to the revolutionary Peking opera explicitly (e.g., McGrath 2010; Mittler 2010). In this article, we use “Model Opera” to refer to the general 18 Model works.
These cases are also recorded in Shanghai local chronicles. See http://www.shtong.gov.cn/node2/node2245/node72149/node72164/node72270/index.html, accessed on December, 25, 2017.
Eventually the goal of exact reproduction was found to conflict with the goal of saturation and the rules on performances were relaxed (“Do a good job on popularizing Model Operas,” The People’s Daily, July 15, 1970).
Several scholars, most notably Clark (2008), have argued that the CCP’s attempts at cultural control, particularly after 1971, were less effective than is generally acknowledged as sent-down youths were active in developing and spreading an innovative underground culture.
References
Ahlquist, K. 1997. Democracy at the opera: Music, theater, and culture in New York City, 1815-60. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Baxandall, M. 1988. Painting and experience in fifteenth century Italy: A primer in the social history of pictorial style (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Benzecry, C.E. 2014. An opera house for the “Paris of south America”: Pathways to the institutionalization of high culture. Theory and Society 43 (2): 169–196.
Berezin, M. 1991. The organization of political ideology: Culture, state, and theater in fascist Italy. American Sociological Review 56 (5): 639–651.
Berezin, M. 1994. Cultural form and political meaning: State-subsidized theater, ideology, and the language of style in fascist Italy. American Journal of Sociology 99 (5): 1237–1286.
Berezin, M. 1997. Making the fascist self: The political culture of interwar Italy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Bourdieu, P., and R. Johnson. 1993. The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature. New York: Columbia University Press.
Bullock, P.R. 2006. Staging stalinism: The search for soviet opera in the 1930s. Cambridge Opera Journal 18 (1): 83–108.
Burke, P. 1992. The fabrication of Louis XIV. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Chen, J. 2006. On the resurgence of Yang Ban Xi (Lun Yang Ban Xi hui chao xian xiang). Journal of National Academy of Chinese Theatre Arts (Xi Qu Yi Shu) 27 (3): 85–89.
Chen, X. 2002. Acting the right part: Political theater and popular drama in contemporary China. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Chiang, Ching. 1968. On the Revolution of Peking opera [Tan jing ju ge ming. English]. Peking: Foreign Languages Press.
Clark, P. 2008. The Chinese cultural revolution: A history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Conquest, R. 2008. The great terror: A reassessment. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Corse, S.M. 1997. Nationalism and literature: The politics of culture in Canada and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Corse, S.M., and S. Westervelt. 2004. Gender and literary valorization: The awakening of a canonical novel. Sociological Perspectives 45 (2): 139–161.
Dai, J. 1995. The turbulent history of the Yangbanxi (Yangbanxi de fengfeng yuyu). Beijing: Zhishi Pulish (Zhi Shi Chu Ban She).
Dai, J. 2009. Yu Huiyong: Talented musician-minister- prisoner (Yu Huiyong: Caizi- buzhang- qiutu). Tong Zhou Gong Jin 8: 53–57.
Deng, W. 2017. Brief history of disputes on “Yang Ban Xi” (“Yang Ban Xi” lun zheng jian shi). Theatres and Literature (Xi Ju Wen Xue) 2: 83–90.
DiMaggio, P. 1982. Cultural entrepreneurship in nineteenth-century Boston: The creation of an organizational base for high culture in America. Media, Culture and Society 4 (1): 33–50.
DiMaggio, P. 1992. Cultural boundaries and structural change: The extension of the high culture model to theater, opera, and the dance, 1900-1940. In Cultivating differences: Symbolic boundaries and the making of inequality, ed. M. Lamont, and M. Fournier, 21–57. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Eyerman, R., and A. Jamison. 1998. Music and social movements: Mobilizing traditions in the twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fitzpatrick, S. 1978. Cultural revolution in Russia, 1928-1931. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Gao, B. 2008. “Model Operas”: Ideologization of Chinese revolutionary history and its formation into art (“Yangbanxi”: Zhongguo gemingshi de yishi xingtaihua he yishuhua). (PhD dissertation, Xiamen University).
Giger, A. 1999. Social control and the censorship of Giuseppe Verdi’s operas in Rome (1844-1859). Cambridge Opera Journal 11 (3): 233–265.
Goldstein, J. 1999. Mei Lanfang and the nationalization of Peking opera, 1912–1930. Positions 7 (2): 377–420.
Goldstein, J. 2007. Drama kings: Players and publics in the re-creation of Peking opera, 1870-1937. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Goldstein, R.J. 1989. Political censorship of the opera. Political censorship of the arts and the press in nineteenth-century Europe, 155–174. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Golomshtok, I., and M. Vale. 1985. The history and organization of artistic life in the Soviet Union. International Journal of Sociology 15 (1–2): 16–59.
Jamosky, E., and J. Robinson. 1981. The Doctrine of “Socialist Realism”. The Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies 6 (1): 57.
Johnson, V. 2007. What is organizational imprinting? Cultural entrepreneurship in the founding of the Paris opera. American Journal of Sociology 113 (1): 97–127.
Johnson, V., J.F. Fulcher, and T. Ertman. 2007. Opera and society in Italy and France from Monteverdi to Bourdieu. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
King, R. 2010. Art in turmoil: The Chinese cultural revolution, 1966-76. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Kraus, R. 1991. Arts policies of the cultural revolution: The rise and fall of culture minister Yu Huiyong. In New perspectives on the cultural revolution, ed. W.A. Joseph, C. Wong, and D. Zweig, 219–242. Cambridge, MA: Council on East Asian Studies/Harvard University.
Lena, J.C. 2012. Banding together: How communities create genres in popular music. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Li, S. 2012. A chronicle of Model Opera of Chinese cultural revolution (“Yang Ban Xi” bian nian yu shi shi) volumn II). Beijing: Zhong yang bian yi chu ban she.
Ma, S. (ed.). 1999. The history of Chinese Peking opera. Beijing: Chinese Theatre Publish House.
MacFarquhar, R., and M. Schoenhals. 2009. Mao’s Last Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Mackerras, C. 1972. The rise of the Peking opera, 1770-1870: Social aspects of the theatre in Manchu China. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Mackerras, C. 1997. Peking opera. Hong Kong, New York: Oxford University Press.
Mao, Z. 1942. Talks at the Yan’an forum on literature and art. Selected Works of Mao Zedong, https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-3/mswv3_08.htm. Accessed 13 Nov 2017.
McGrath, J. 2010. Cultural revolution Model Opera films and the realist tradition in Chinese cinema. The Opera Quarterly 26 (2–3): 343–376.
Mittler, B. 2010. “Eight stage works for 800 million people”: The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution in Music—A view from Revolutionary opera. The Opera Quarterly 26 (2–3): 377–401.
Mo, W. and He, Q. 2007 “Yang Ban Xi” publications during the “Cultural Revolution” (“Wen hua da ge ming” shi qi de “Yang Ban Xi” tu shu chu ban wu). Literature on Party History: Documentary Version (Dang Shi Wen Yuan: Ji Shi Ban) (3), 4–8.
Panse, B. 1996. The influence of the Reich’s Ministry of Propaganda on German theatre and drama, 1933-1945. In Fascism and theatre: Comparative studies on the aesthetics and politics of performance in Europe, 1925-1945, ed. G. Berghaus, 140–156. Providence, RI: Berghahn Books.
Piperno, F. 2007. State and Market, Production and Style: An interdisciplinary approach to eighteenth-century Italian opera history. In Opera and society in Italy and France from Monteverdi to Bourdieu, ed. V. Johnson, J.F. Fulcher, and T. Ertman, 138–159. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reid, S.E. 2001. Socialist Realism in the Stalinist Terror: The industry of socialism art exhibition, 1935–41. The Russian Review 60 (2): 153–184.
Roberts, R.A. 2010. Maoist model theatre: The semiotics of gender and sexuality in the Chinese Cultural Revolution (1966-1976) Leiden. Boston: Brill.
Roscigno, V.J., and W.F. Danaher. 2001. Media and Mobilization: The case of radio and southern textile worker insurgency, 1929 to 1934. American Sociological Review 66 (1): 21–48.
Rousso, H. 1994. The vichy syndrome: History and memory in France since 1944 (A. Goldhammer Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Santoro, M. 2010. Constructing an artistic field as a political project: Lessons from La Scala. Poetics 38 (6): 534–554.
Schültke, B. 1996. The municipal theatre in Frankfurt-on-the-main: A provincial theatre under national socialism. In Fascism and theatre: Comparative studies on the aesthetics and politics of performance in Europe, 1925-1945, ed. G. Berghaus, 157–171. Providence, RI: Berghahn Books.
Service Center for Chinese Publications. 1995. A collection of historical documents of the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party: special volume for the Cultural Revolution and its evaluation (zhong gong zhong yang li shi wen xian zi liao hui bian: “Wenge” li shi zi liao ji ping jia zhuan ji), volume 138. Los Angles [Calif.]: Service Center for Chinese Publications (Zhong wen chu ban wu fu wu zhong xin).
Shi, Y.G., and F. Zhang. 2009. The history of Yang Ban Xi (Yang Ban Xi shi ji). Beijing: Authors’ Publication (Zuo Jia Chu Ban She).
Stamatov, P. 2002. Interpretive activism and the political uses of Verdi’s operas in the 1840s. American Sociological Review 67 (3): 345–366.
Steinberg, M.P., and S. Stewart-Steinberg. 2007. Fascism and the operatic unconscious. In Opera and society in Italy and France from Monteverdi to Bourdieu, ed. V. Johnson, J.F. Fulcher, and T. Ertman, 267–288. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, D. 1996. The organisation, fascistisation and management of theatre in Italy, 1925–1943. In Fascism and theatre: Comparative studies on the aesthetics and politics of performance in Europe, 1925-1945, ed. G. Berghaus, 94–112. Providence, RI: Berghahn Books.
Tsutsui, K. 2009. The trajectory of perpetrators’ trauma: Mnemonic politics around the Asia-pacific war in Japan. Social Forces 87 (3): 1389–1422.
Wang, Z. 2006. Wang Zengqi on Opera (Wang Zengqi Shuo Xi). Jinan: Shandong Pictorial Publishing House.
Weber, W. 2006. Redefining the status of opera: London and Leipzig, 1800–1848. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 36 (3): 507–532.
Wu, M. 2010. The so-called events of ‘destroying Model Operas’ 40 years ago (40 nian qian de suo wei “po huai ge ming Yang Ban Xi” shi jian). Century (Shiji) 1: 14–17.
Xu, C. 2012. Peking opera. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yang, D.S. 1971. Censorship: 8 model works. The Drama Review: TDR 15 (2): 258–261.
Ye, T. 2008. Historical dictionary of Chinese Theater. Lanham: Scarecrow Press.
Ye, Y. 1993. Biography of Jiang Qing (Jiang Qing Zhuan). Beijing: Authors’ Publishing (Zuo Jia Chu Ban She).
Zhao, X. 2005. Reorganization of the Ministry of Culture in 1965 (1965 nian de wen hua bu da gai zu). General Review of the Communist Party of China (Dang Shi Bo Lan) 3: 005.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the editors and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions. We would also like to thank Allison Pugh and the participants of her 2015 writing workshop for their help in developing this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
The translations of titles are based on Yang (1971) “Censorship: 8 Model Works.” The Drama Review: TDR, Vol. 15, No. 2, Theatre in Asia, pp. 258–261, as well as the online resources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutionary_opera.
Appendix
The original “Eight Model Operas (Works)”
“Revolutionary Modern” Peking Opera:
-
The Red Lantern (Hongdeng Ji)
-
Shachiabang
-
Taking Tiger Mountain by Strategy (Zhiqu Weihu Shan)
-
Sweeping the White Tiger Regiment (Qixi Baihu Tuan)
-
On the Docks (Haigang)
“Revolutionary Modern” Ballet:
-
The White-Haired Girl (Baimao Nü)
-
Red Detachment of Women (Hongse Niangzi Jun)
Symphony:
-
Shachiabang
The additional ten model works
“Revolutionary Modern” Peking Opera:
-
The Azalea Mountain (Dujuan Shan)
-
Song of the Dragon River (Longjiang Song)
-
Red Detachment of Women (Hongse Niangzi Jun)
-
The Warfare on the Plain (Pingyuan Zuozhan)
-
Panshiwan
-
Hongyun Gang (Same story with Song of the Yimeng Mountain)
“Revolutionary Modern” Ballet:
-
Song of the Yimeng Mountain (Yimeng Song)
-
The Brother and Sister on the Prairie (Caoyuan Ernü)
Piano-accompanied cantata:
-
The Red Lantern (Hongdeng Ji)
Piano concerto:
-
The Yellow River (Huanghe)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, H., Corse, S.M. Staging communism: state control and the Chinese Model Opera. Am J Cult Sociol 7, 79–100 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-017-0056-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-017-0056-4