Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Transitional edges: a conceptual framework for socio-spatial understanding of urban street edges

  • Original Article
  • Published:
URBAN DESIGN International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper develops a conceptual framework of transitional edges to enhance understanding of the social value of urban street edges. Building from theoretical principles associated with socio-spatial understandings of urban realms, transitional edges conceptualise urban street edges as integrations of their social, spatial and material dimensions. This is captured in a tripartite structure highlighting socially relevant properties of transitional edges that act along them (extent), across them (laterality) and within them (locality). This provides a foundation for developing an approach to practical application based on identification and evaluation of transitional edges as assemblages of territorialised segments. To progress this, a developmental study of a length of Sharrow Vale Road in Sheffield, UK was carried out to explore how theoretical principles of the transitional edge conceptual framework could be translated for practical application. This reveals the potential of transitional edges to highlight that locally focused small-scale change and adaptation may be significant to the social potential of urban street edges. As a result, the current study sets out theoretical and practical foundations for a conceptual framework of transitional edges which will support development of an extensive funded programme of transitional edge case study research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, C., S. Ishikawa, M. Silverstein, M. Jacobson, I. Fiksdahl-King, and S. Angel. 1977. A Pattern Language. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman, I. 1975. The Environment and Social Behaviour: Privacy, Personal Space, Territoriality and Crowding. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arefi, M., and C. Kickert (eds.). 2019. The Palgrave Handbook of Bottom-Up Urbanism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, I., A. Alcock, P. Murrain, S. McGlynn, and G. Smith. 1985. Responsive Environments. London: The Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biddulph, M. 2007. Introduction to Residential Layout. London: Butterworth-Heinemann, Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosselmann, P. 2008. Urban Transformation: Understanding city design and form. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boys Smith, N. 2016. Heart in the Right Street. London: Create Streets.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmona, M., T. Heath, T. Oc, and S. Tiesdell. 2003. Public Spaces Urban Places: The Dimensions of Urban Design. Oxon: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, E. 1998. The Fate of Place: A Philosophical Journey. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiesi, L. 2016. Territoriality as Appropriation of Space: How ‘engaging with space’ Frames Sociality. In Cultural Sustainability and Regional Development: Theories and Practices of Territorialisation, ed. J. Dessin, E. Battiglini, and L. Hornings. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper-Marcus, C., and W. Sarkissia. 1986. Housing as if People Mattered: Site Design Guidelines for Medium-Density Family Housing. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, T. 2015. Place: An Introduction. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, S. (ed.). 2018. The Grimsey Review 2. London: The Grimsey Review Team.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuthbert, A. 2007. Urban Design: Requiem for an Era—Review and Critique of the Last 50 Years. Urban Design International 12: 177–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLanda, M. 2006. A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. and F. Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (trans: Massumi, B.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Dovey, K. 1993. Putting Geometry in its Place: Toward a Phenomenology of the Design Process. In Dwelling, Seeing and Designing: Toward a Phenomenological Ecology, ed. D. Seamon. Albany: State University of New York Press.

  • Dovey, K. 2005. The Silent Complicity of Architecture. In Habitus: A Sense of Place, 2nd ed, ed. J. Hillier and J. Rooksby. London: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovey, K. 2010. Becoming Places: Urbanism/Architecture/Identity/Power. Abbingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovey, K., and K. Polakit. 2010. Urban Slippage: Smooth and Striated Streetscapes in Bangkok. In Becoming Places: Urbanism/Architecture/Identity/Power, ed. K. Dovey. Abbingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovey, K., and S. Wood. 2015. Public/Private Interfaces: Type, Adaptation, Assemblage. Journal of Urbanism 8 (1): 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovey, K., F. Rao, and E. Pafka. 2018. Agglomoration and Assemblage: Deterritorialising Urban Theory. Urban Studies 55 (2): 263–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, R. 1998. Principles for a Free Society: Reconciling Individual Liberty with the Common Good. Reading, MA: Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewin, R., and O. Clemente. 2013. Measuring Urban Design: Metrics for Liveable Places. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franck, K.A., and Q. Stevens. 2007. Loose Space: Possibility and Diversity in Urban Life. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehl, J. 1977. The Interface Between Public and Private Territories in Residential Areas. Melbourne: University of Melbourne Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehl, J. 2006. Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space, 6th ed. Copenhagen: Danish Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehl, J. 2010. Cities for People. Washington: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehl, J., and L. Gemzoe. 2004. Public Spaces, Public Life. Copenhagen: Danish Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehl, J., and B. Svarre. 2013. How to Study Public Life. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, M., van ‘t Hoff, H. Karssenberg, J. Laven, and J. van Teeffelen. 2012. The City at Eye Level: lessons for street plinths. Delft: Eburon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habraken, N.J. 1998. The Structure of the Ordinary: Form and Control in the Built Environment. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, C., and L. Aultmann-Hall. 2016. Measuring Urban Streets for Liveability: A Review of Approaches. The Professional Geographer 68 (1): 149–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heffernan, E., T. Heffernan, and W. Pan. 2014. The Relationship Between the Quality of Active Frontages and Public Perceptions of Public Spaces. Urban Design International 19 (1): 92–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogland, C. 2000. Semi-private Zones as a Facilitator of Social Cohesion. MA thesis. Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen.

  • Jacobs, J. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, A.B. 1993. Great Streets. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickert, C.C. 2016. Active Centers—Interactive Edges: The Rise and Fall of Ground Floor Frontages. Urban Design International 21 (1): 55–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebrve, H. 1991. The Production of Space. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, E. 2005. Street-Facing Dwelling Units and Liviability: The Impacts of Emerging Building Types in Vancouver’s New High-density Residential Neighbourhoods. Journal of Urban Design 10 (1): 13–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madanipour, A. 2003. Public and Private Spaces of the City. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madanipour, A., K. Miciukiewicz, and G. Vigar. 2018. Master Plans and Urban Change: The Case of Sheffield City Centre. Journal of Urban Design 23 (4): 465–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malpas, J. 1999. Place and Experience: A Philosophical Topography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malpas, J. 2006. Heidegger’s Topology: Being, Place, World. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. 1996. Back-Alley as Community Landscape. Landscape Journal 15 (2): 138–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, V. 2014. Evaluating Public Space. Journal of Urban Design 19 (1): 53–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, V., and B. Mahato. 2019. Measuring the Robustness of Neighbourhood Business Districts. Journal of Urban Design 24 (1): 99–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moughtin, C. 2003. Urban Design: Street and Square, 3rd ed. Oxford: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muminovic, M. 2015. Places as Assemblages: Paradigm Shift or Fashionable Nonsense? Athens Journal of Architecture 1: 295–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooraddin, H. 2002. In-Between Space: Towards Establishing New Methods in Street Design. Global Built Environment Review 2 (1): 50–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, O. 1972. Defensible Space: Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porta, S., and J.L. Renne. 2005. Linking Urban Design to Sustainability: Formal Indicators of Social Urban Sustainability Field Research in Perth, Western Australia. Urban Design International 10: 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porqueddu, E. 2018. Toward the Open City: Design and Research for Emergent Urban Systems. Urban Design International 10: 236–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radovic, D. and M. Muminovic. 2011. Spatial Expressions of Local Identity in the Times of Rapid Globalisation: A Case Study of the Yanasen Area in Tokyo. Proceedings: IAPS International Network Symposium, Daegu, South Korea.

  • Rudlin, D., and N. Falk. 1999. Sustainable Urban Neighbourhood: Building the 21st Century Home. Oxford: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J., M. Freeth, K.J. Simpson, and K. Thwaites. 2018. Visual Engagement With Urban Street Edges: Insights Using Mobile Eye-Tracking. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability 12 (3): 259–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J., K. Thwaites, and M. Freeth. 2019. Understanding Visual Engagement with Urban Street Edges Along Non-Pedestrianised and Pedestrianised Streets Using Mobile Eye-Tracking. Sustainability 11 (15): 4251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stravides, S. 2007. Heterotopias and the Experience of Porous Urban Space. In Loose Space: Possibility and diversity in urban life, ed. K.A. Franck and Q. Stevens. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban Task Force. 1999. Towards an Urban Renaissance: Final Report of the Urban Task Force. London: E and FN Spon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W.H. 1988. City: Rediscovering the Centre. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Sheffield, Arts Tower, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK

    Kevin Thwaites & James Simpson

  2. Experiemics: Experiential Landscape Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK

    Ian Simkins

Authors
  1. Kevin Thwaites
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James Simpson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ian Simkins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin Thwaites.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thwaites, K., Simpson, J. & Simkins, I. Transitional edges: a conceptual framework for socio-spatial understanding of urban street edges. Urban Des Int 25, 295–309 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-020-00115-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-020-00115-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation