Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Eating outdoors: an inscription–prescription analysis of user behaviour in public spaces

  • Original Article
  • Published:
URBAN DESIGN International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines how public spaces deal with users’ demand for eating food under the framework of inscription–prescription (Akrich, in: Law and Bijker (eds) Shaping Technology/Building Society: studies in socio-technical change, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1992), which is based on actor-network theory (ANT). This concept approaches to a physical setting of space working for eating activity, and reveals the social–material interactions in public space. The empirical research was conducted in two small public spaces in London—Fortune Street Park and Kingston Ancient Market. This research reveals (1) the detailed inscription (materialisation) process from the social interests connected with eating to the physical objects in public space; (2) the different relational dynamics between various actors in the prescription for eating; and (3) how the eating prescriptions in each case respond to the other activities. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of the prescription framework as an empirical tool for exploring diverse public space issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. There is an item in the questionnaire asking respondents to mark the areas or parts on the map they usually frequent.

  2. This was enshrined in the question “Do you work or live close to the park?” which offered three alternative responses, work/live/neither.

References

  • Akrich, M. 1992. The Description of Technical Objects. In Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Socio-technical Change, ed. J. Law and W.E. Bijker, 205–224. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akrich, M., and B. Latour. 1992. A Summary of a Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies. In Shaping Technology/Building Society Studies in Sociotecnical Change, ed. J. Law and W.E. Bijker, 259–264. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C. 1979. The Timeless Way of Building. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty, M., 2003. Agent-Based Pedestrian Modelling. Working Papers Series, Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London, paper 61.

  • Carmona, M., C. de Magalhães, and L. Hammond. 2008. Public Space: The Management Dimension. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carmona, M., and F.M. Wunderlich. 2013. Capital Spaces: The Multiple Complex Public Spaces of a Global City. London and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cerdá, I. 1867. Teoría general de la urbanización, y aplicación de sus principios y doctrinas a la reforma y ensanche de Barcelona, Imprenta Española.

  • Chemero, A. 2003. An Outline of a Theory of Affordances. Ecological Psychology 15 (2): 181–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franck, K., and Q. Stevens. 2006. Loose Space: Possibility and Diversity in Urban Life. Abington: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gaisbauer, C. and A.U. Frank. 2008. Wayfinding Model for Pedestrian Navigation. In 11th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science 2008. University of Girona, Spain.

  • Gehl, J., and J. Koch. 2001. Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space. Copenhagen: Arkitektens forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J.J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Mifflin and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottdiener, M., and A.P. Lagopoulos. 1986. The City and the Sign: An Introduction to Urban Semiotics. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, J.G. 1994. Gibson’s Affordances. Psychological Review 101 (2): 336–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartson, R. 2003. Cognitive, Physical, Sensory, and Functional Affordances in Interaction Design. Behaviour & Information Technology 22 (5): 315–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, C. 1980. The Architectural Sign. In Signs, Symbols and Architecture, ed. G. Broadbent, R. Bunt, and C. Jencks, 107–110. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krampen, M. 1979. Meaning in the Urban Environment. Thousand Oaks: Pion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. 1992. Where are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts. In Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, ed. J. Law and W. Bijker, 225–258. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. 1994. On Technical Mediation. Common Knowledge 3 (2): 29–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loveland, K.A. 1991. Social Affordances and Interaction II: Autism and the Affordances of the Human Environment. Ecological Psychology 3 (2): 99–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. 2004. Affordances and design. Unpublished article. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265618710_Affordances_and_Design. Accessed 18 Sept 2019.

  • Ozbil, A., J. Peponis, and B. Stone. 2011. Understanding the Link Between Street Connectivity, Land Use and Pedestrian Flows. Urban Design International 16 (2): 125–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A. 1982. The Meaning of the Built Environment: A Nonverbal Communication Approach. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salingaros, N.A. 1999. Urban Space and Its Information Field. Journal of Urban Design 4 (1): 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauter, D., and M. Huettenmoser. 2008. Liveable Streets and Social Inclusion. Urban Design International 13 (2): 67–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schelhorn, T. et al. 1999. Streets: An Agent-based Pedestrian Model. Working Papers Series, Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London, paper 9.

  • Stoffregen, T.A. 2003. Affordances as Properties of the Animal-Environment System. Ecological Psychology 15 (2): 115–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, A. 2003. Analysing the Visual Dynamics of Spatial Morphology. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 30: 657–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turvey, M.T. 1992. Affordances and Prospective Control: An Outline of the Ontology. Ecological Psychology 4 (3): 173–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W.H. 1980. The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. Washington, DC: Conservation Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye, L., W. Cardwell, and L.S. Mark. 2009. Perceiving Multiple Affordances for Objects. Ecological Psychology 21 (3): 185–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zacharias, J. 2001. Pedestrian Behavior Pedestrian Behavior and Perception in Urban Walking Environments. Journal of Planning Literature 16 (1): 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimring, C., et al. 2005. Influences of Building Design and Site Design on Physical Activity: Research and Intervention Opportunities. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 28 (2 Suppl 2): 186–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bartlett School of Planning, University College London, 6th Floor Central House, London, WC1H 0NN, UK

    Jihyun Kim

Authors
  1. Jihyun Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jihyun Kim.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, J. Eating outdoors: an inscription–prescription analysis of user behaviour in public spaces. Urban Des Int 24, 280–295 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-019-00103-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-019-00103-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation