Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Influence of urban forms on social sustainability: A case of Guwahati, Assam

  • Original Article
  • Published:
URBAN DESIGN International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the last decade, the rapid growth of cities and exacerbated social problems have led to a great deal of inquiry on the extent to which the physical forms of cities can contribute towards achieving a just and sustainable future. Past investigations in the western context have remained less than satisfactory, further raising concerns about their applicability to the developing world cities which face essentially different urbanisation challenges and socio-cultural shifts. As India prepares itself to become an urban majority by 2050 and gives shape to its futuristic smart cities, there is clearly a pressing need to develop stronger empirical evidence about the influence of urban forms on social sustainability which links to sustainable design, policies and practices. This research therefore, tests the effects of urban forms on six aspects of social sustainability using both, qualitative and quantitative strategies, which are calibrated and validated for Guwahati, the dominant city of Assam in India. The quantitative findings for two urban form types using six case studies show that neighbourhood forms with connected and integrated street network, higher proportion of accessible open recreational spaces, higher mix of uses, higher densities and smaller compact urban blocks display higher levels of social sustainability amongst its residents, after controlling for intervening variables. Qualitative findings for four urban form types using twelve case studies further illuminate this complex relationship at the scale of block-segments. It highlights five key theories: (i) intervening variables, (ii) spatial proximity, (iii) favourable spatiality, (iv) complementing synergies and (v) tipping point.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Advani, M. and Tiwari, G. (2005) Evaluation of public transport systems: Case study of Delhi Metro. Proceeding of START-2005 Conference held at IIT Kharagpur, India.

  • Alexander, C. (1966) A city is not a tree. Design 206: 46–55.

  • Anderson, W.P., Kanargoglou, P.S. and Miller, E.J. (1996)Urban form, energy and the environment: A review of issues, policy and development. Urban Studies 33(1):17–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahadure, S. and Kotharkar, R. (2012) Social sustainability and mixed landuse, case study of neighborhoods in Nagpur, India. Bonfring International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Science 2(4):76–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberger, M. (2000) Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Research in Development Projects. Washington DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, F. and Palmer, C. (2002) ‘Opportunity structures’: Urban landscape, social capital and health promotion in Australia. Health Promotion International 17(4): 351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertolini, L., le Clerq, F. and Straatemeier, T. (2008) Urban transportation planning in transition. Transport Policy 15: 69–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bramley, G. and Power, S. (2009) Urban form and social sustainability: The role of density and housing type. Environmental Planning B 36(1): 30–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breheny, M. (1992) Sustainable Development and Urban Form. London: Pion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B.B. and Cropper, V.L. (2001) New urban and standard suburban subdivisions: Evaluating psychological and social goals. American Planning Association Journal 67(4): 402–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruin, M.J. and Cook, C.C. (1997) Understanding constraints and residential satisfaction among low-income single-parent families’ Environment and Behavior 29: 532–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, E. (2000) The compact city: Just or just compact? A preliminary analysis. Urban Studies 37(11):1969–2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calthorpe, P. (1993) The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.

  • Caniggia, G. and Maffei, G.L. (1979) Architectural Composition and Building Typology: Interpreting Basic Building. Firenze: Alinea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T. and Tiesdell, S. (2003) Public Places Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design. Oxford: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colantonio, A. (2007) Social Sustainability: Linking Research to Policy and Practice. Headington: Oxford Brookes University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colantonio, A. (2008) Traditional and Emerging Prospects in Social Sustainability. Measuring Social Sustainability: Best Practice from Urban Renewal in the EU. Headington: Oxford Institute for Sustainable Development (OISD), Oxford Brookes University.

  • Colantonio, A. and Dixon, T. (2011) Urban Regeneration & Social Sustainability Best Practice from European Cities. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J., Plano, C.V., Gutmann, M. and Hanson, E. (2003) Advanced mixed methods research designs. In: A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie (eds.) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioural Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 209–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey, N., Brown, C., Raman, S., Porta, S., Jenks, M., Jones, C. and Bramley, G. (2010) Elements of urban form. In: M. Jenks and C. Jones (eds.) Dimensions of the Sustainable City. London: Springer, pp. 21–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey, N., Bramley, G., Powers, S. and Brown, C. (2011) The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability. Sustainable Development 19(5): 289–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dieleman, F. and Wegener, M. (2004) Compact city and urban sprawl. Built Environment 30(4): 308–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doshi, B. (1997) Social institutions and a sense of place. In F. Ameen (ed.) Contemporary Architecture and City Form: The South Asian Paradigm. Marg Publications, Mumbai, pp. 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, N. and Woods, L. (2010) Travel and mobility. In: M. Jenks and C. Jones (eds.) Dimensions of the Sustainable City. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, C.S. (1982) To Dwell Among Friends. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, R. (1982) Urban Utopias in the Twentieth Century: Ebenezer Howard, Frank Lloyd Wright, and Le Corbusier. Cambridge: MIT.

  • Forrest, R. and Kearns, A. (2001) Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood. Urban Studies 38: 2125–2143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1995) Trust: The Social Virtues & The Creation of Prosperity. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giuliani, M.V. (2003) Theory of attachment and place attachment. In: M. Bonnes, T. Lee and M. Bonainto (eds.) Psychological Theories for Environmental Issues. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 137–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B.G. (1978) Theoretical Sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopal, A. and Nair, S. (2014) An approach for analyzing prospects of urban compaction in Indian cities. Journal of Civil Engineering and Environmental Technology 1(1): 21–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest, A.M. and Lee, B.A. (1983) Sentiment and evaluation as ecological variables. Sociological Perspectives 26(2): 159–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handy, S. (1996) Methodologies for exploring the link between urban form and travel behavior. Transportation Research: Transport and Environment D 2(2): 151–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, S., Boarnet, M., Ewing, R. and Killingsworth, R. (2002) How the built environment affects physical activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 23(2S): 64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemani, S. and Das, A.K. (2015) Humanizing Urban Development in India: Call for a more comprehensive approach to Social Sustainability in the urban policy and design context. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development. doi:10.1080/19463138.2015.1074580

  • Hessler, R., Kubish, P., New, P., Ellison, D. and Taylor, F. (1971) Demographic context, social interaction, and perceived health status: Excedrin headache #1. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 12: 191–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, B. (1996) Space is the Machine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jabareen, Y.R. (2006) Sustainable urban forms: Their typologies, models, and concepts. Journal of Planning Education and Research 26(1): 38–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1961) The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenks, M. and Jones, C. (eds.) (2010) Dimensions of the Sustainable City. London: Springer.

  • Jenks, M. and Burgess, R. (2000) Compact Cities: Sustainable Urban Forms for Developing Countries. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenks, M. and Dempsey, N. (eds.) (2005) Future Forms and Design for Sustainable Cities. Oxford: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamruzzaman, M., Baker, D., Washington, S. and Turrell, G. (2014) Advance transit oriented development typology: Case study in Brisbane, Australia. Journal of Transport Geography 34: 54–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karrholm, M. (2011) The scaling of sustainable urban form: A case of scale-related issues and sustainable planning in Malmo, Sweden. European Planning Studies 19(1): 97–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keane, C. (1991) Socioenvironmental determinants of community formation. Environment and Behavior 23(1): 27–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, A. and Forrest, R. (2000) Social cohesion and multilevel urban governance. Urban Studies 37(5/6): 995–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. and Kaplan, R. (2004) Physical and psychological factors in sense of community: New urbanist Kentlands and nearby Orchard Village. Environment and Behavior 36(3): 313–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, A. (2000) The inverted compact city of Delhi. In: Compact Cities: Sustainable Urban Forms for Developing Countries. London: Spon Press, pp.153–166.

  • Leyden, K. (2003) Social capital and the built environment: The importance of walkable neighborhoods. American Journal of Public Health 93(9): 1546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. (1981) Good City Form. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, S. and Çalişkan, O. (2011) A joint framework for urban morphology and design. Built Environment 37(4): 409–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, S. (2010) Can community design build trust? A comparative study of design factors in Boise, Idaho neighborhoods. Cities 27: 456–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, S. (2004) Social Sustainability: Towards some definitions. Working Paper Series No. 27. Australia: Hawke Research Institute.

  • Meegan, R. and Mitchell, A. (2001) ‘It’s not community round here, it’s neighbourhood’: Neighbourhood change and cohesion in urban regeneration policies. Urban studies 38(12): 21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moudon, A.V. (1986) Built for Change: Neighborhood Architecture in San Francisco. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, V. and Christie, I. (2003) Making Sense of Community. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, P. and Kenworthy, J. (1989) Gasoline consumption and cities: A comparison of U.S. cities with a global survey. Journal of the American Planning Association 55(1): 24–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, M. (2005) The compact city fallacy. Journal of Planning Education and Research 25: 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NIUA, National Institute of Urban Affairs. (2011) Sustainable Urban Form for Indian Cities, Research Study Series No. 112, March.

  • NMSH, Ministry of Urban Development Report (2010) National Mission on Sustainable Habitat. Government of India.

  • Oswald, F. and Baccini, P. (2003) Netzstadt, Designing the Urban. Basel: Birkhauser.

    Google Scholar 

  • ONS survey matrix (November 2001) Social Analysis and Reporting Division. Office of National Statistics, UK. www.ons.gov.uk/ons/guide…/social-capital–matrix-of-surveys.pdf, accessed 10 May 2012.

  • Owen, N., Humpel, N., Leslie, E., Bauman, A. and Sallis, J.F. (2004) Understanding environmental influences on walking: Review and research agenda. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 27: 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkes, A., Kearns, A. and Atkinson, R. (2002) What makes people dissatisfied with their neighbourhoods? Urban Studies 39(13): 2413–2438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, J. (2002) Tackling Social Exclusion. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Podobnik, B. (2002) New Urbanism and the generation of social capital: Evidence from Orenco Station. National Civic Review 91: 245–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Rudlin, D. and Falk, N. (2009) The Sustainable Urban Neighbourhood: Building the 21st Century Home. London: Routledge.

  • Sampson, R.J. (1988) Local friendship ties and community attachment in mass society: A multilevel systemic model. American Sociological Review 53(5): 766–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarantakos, S. (2005) Social Research, 2nd ed. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Selkirk, K.E. (1982) Pattern and Place: An Introduction to the Mathematics of Geography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talen, E. (1999) Sense of community and neighbourhood form: An assessment of the social doctrine of new urbanism. Urban Studies 36: 1361–1379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C. (eds.) (2010) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 297–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennyson-Mason, R. (2002) Tackling the Fear of Crime: Putting the Pieces of the Jigsaw Together. Leeds: Guidance for Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnerships, Government Office for Yorkshire and the Humber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolentino, A. (2011) Suburban Tissue Analysis and Retrofitability: Creating A Catalogue And Scoring System For Potential Retrofit Sites. Georgia Institute of Technology. http://www.cnu.org/sites/www.cnu.org/files/armantolentino_suburban_tissue_analysis_and_retrofitability_1.pdf, accessed 6 December 2013.

  • Tuan, Y.F. (1974) Topophilia. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torjman, S. (2000) Social Dimension of Sustainable Development. Paper prepared for the Commissioner of Environment and Sustainable Development at the Office of Auditor General, Caledon Institute of Social Policy, pp. 1–11.

  • UDC Urban Design Compendium (2000) English Partnerships and The Housing Corporation, UK.

  • Wiersinga, W. (1997) Compensation as a Strategy for Improving Environmental Quality in Compact Cities. Amsterdam: Bureau SME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R.G., Kawachi, I. and Kennedy, B.P. (1998) Mortality, the social environment, crime and violence. Sociology of Health & Illness 20(5): 578–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K., Burton, E. and Jenks, M. (2000) Achieving Sustainable Urban Form. London:Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcraft, S. (2011) Design for social sustainability: A framework for creating thriving new communities. Homes and Communities Agency, Young Foundation. pp 1.

  • Yang, Y. (2008) A tale of two cities: Physical form and neighborhood satisfaction in metropolitan Portland and Charlotte. Journal of the American Planning Association 74(3): 307–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Aayojan School of Architecture, C/9, Bal Marg, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan, 302004, India

    Shruti Hemani

  2. Department of Design, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam, 781039, India

    A. K. Das

  3. MIT Institute of Design, Pune, Maharashtra, 412201, India

    Anirban Chowdhury

Authors
  1. Shruti Hemani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. K. Das
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anirban Chowdhury
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shruti Hemani.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hemani, S., Das, A.K. & Chowdhury, A. Influence of urban forms on social sustainability: A case of Guwahati, Assam. Urban Des Int 22, 168–194 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-016-0012-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-016-0012-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation