Skip to main content
Log in

Carnal legalities: affective lives within zones of counter-terrorism operation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Subjectivity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article emerges from the anthropological fieldwork carried out in the eastern Ukraine from 2014 to 2015 and in the Chechen Republic of the Russian Federation between 2006 and 2009. Both locales, at a time of the research, were marked by proximity of the ongoing armed conflicts, and were legally defined as the “Zones of Counter-Terrorism Operation”. The legal status of the Zones not only suspended a number of laws and created new forms of violence, but also coexisted with the sense of everyday life being “normal” in spite of immanent albeit usually covert violence of ongoing disappearances and torture. Moreover, sustaining the status of the zones necessitated the systematic production of terrorists that depended on the massive fabrications of legal cases that in their own right relied on confessions and signatures acquired under torture or, quite often, on the killing and kidnapping of young men to present them as exterminated terrorists. This article does not present a comparative study between Chechen and eastern Ukrainian armed conflicts. Instead, it engages ethnographically with the notion of bespredel, literally limitlessness, which in these post-soviet spaces define affective conditions of life and is evoked to designate the unjust or violent actions of state agents. The article insists that the modalities of legal operations cannot be adequately understood through the analytical concepts of the “state of exception” and “thanatopolitics”; such do not pay sufficient attention to the short circuits and affectivity of the power effects. Rather, the article asks what kind of corporealities and sensibilities are presupposed, effected or failed to be so under such circumstances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This article is prepared with the support of the European Social Fund under the No 09.3.3-LMT-K-712 “Development of Competences of Scientists, other Researchers and Students through Practical Research Activities” measure.

  2. Federal Security Services (Bureau), Rus. Federal’naia Sluzhba Bezopasnosti. Russia’s main state security agency. Former KGB.

  3. Wahhabit (pl. Wahhabity)—a general, usually disparaging, term in Chechnya and Russia evoked by politician and law enforcement agents to indicate a rebel or terrorist, at times a follower of radical political Islam understood as Wahhabism.

  4. Struktury—Rus. literally “structures”, a common term that denotes any state institution, or number of them, which one way or another have to do with law enforcement and control but do not necessarily direct application of force, e.g. it applies to police, army, as much as to an administrative apparatus.

  5. The events of bespredel, which I am describing here, could be employed to trace the formation of desire in the legal practices manifesting at the limits of articulation and barely representable corporeal experiences. These events are more excessive as well as less positively productive in the constitution of the subject than Foucault’s notion of apparatus would have it (e.g. Foucault 1980). They also speak less of social (legal) production stuck to desiring machines that produce and proliferates lacks, extracting and subsuming desires of the bodies in the process of subjectification as Deleuze and Guattari (1983) imagined, and more of the desiring legalities that dispenses desires of the subject altogether (cf. Smith 2007). Yet, as I indicated, this merits a separate inquiry and falls beyond the scope of this paper.

References

  • Agamben, G. 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life (trans: Heller-Roazen, D.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Agamben, G. 2005. State of Exception (trans: Atell, K.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Anderson, B. 2012. Affect and Biopower: Towards a Politics of Life. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 37: 28–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asad, T. 2003. Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Athanasiou, A. 2003. Technologies of Humanness, Aporias of Biopolitics, and the Cut Body of Humanity. Differences 14 (1): 125–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein, E. 2007. Overkill: Sex and Violence in Contemporary Russian Popular Culture. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copjec, J. 2002. Imagine There's No Woman: Ethics and Sublimation. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Alwis, M. 2009. ‘Disappearance’ and ‘Displacement’ in Sri Lanka. Journal of Refugee Studies 22 (3): 378–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., Guattari. F. 1983. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (trans: Hurley, R., Mark, S., Lane, H. R.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Dennis, D. 2018. Challenging the State of Exception: New Ethnographies of International Migration and its Constraints. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review. https://polarjournal.org/2018/06/11/review-essay-challenging-the-state-of-exception-new-ethnographies-of-international-migration-and-its-constraints/. Accessed 19 Aug 2018.

  • Douzinas, C. 2005. Violence, Justice, Deconstruction. German Law Journal 6: 171–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 1980. Two Lectures. In Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 19721977 (ed.) C. Gordon (trans: Marshall, L., Gordon, C., Mepham, J., Soper, K.). London: Harvester Press Limited.

  • Gordon, A.F. 1997. Ghostly Matters. Haunting and the Sociological Imagination. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gostev, I. 1989. Bespredel [feature film 102 min]. Mosfilm: USSR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights Watch. 2016. You Don’t Exist: Arbitrary Detentions, Enforced Disappearances, and Torture in Eastern Ukraine. https://www.hrw.org/report/2016/07/21/you-dont-exist/arbitrary-detentions-enforced-disappearances-and-torture-eastern. Accessed 15 Aug 2016.

  • Humphrey, C. 2002. The Unmaking of Soviet Life: Everyday Economies After Socialism. Cornell: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iancu, N., et al. 2016. Countering Hybrid Threats: Lessons Learned from Ukraine. Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. 2017. Anthropology contra Ethnography. Journal of Ethnographic Theory 7 (1): 21–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, R.C. 2011. Sovereignty and political modernity: A genealogy of Agamben’s critique of sovereignty. Anthropological Theory 11 (1): 23–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvedaravicius, M. 2016. Mariupolis [documentary film 89 min.]. Studio Uljana Kim and Extimacy Films, Vilnius; Twenty Twenty Vision, Berlin; 435 Films, Kyiv; Rouge International, Paris.

  • Kvedaravicius, M. 2013. Knots of absence: death, dreams, and disappearances at the limits of law in the Counter-Terrorism Zone of Chechnya. Ph.D. diss., Department of Social Anthropology. University of Cambridge.

  • Linke, U. 2006. Contact Zones: Rethinking the Sensual Life of the State. Anthropological Theory 6 (2): 205–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozovsky, V. 2005. Kak vyzhit’ i provesti vremya s pol’zoy v tyur’me. http://shop.tyurem.net/. Accessed 22 Nov 2011.

  • Mbembe, A. 2003. Necropolitics. Public Culture 15 (1): 11–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikitinsky, V. 1989. Bespredel. Ogonyok 32: 27–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oushakine, S.A. 2006. The Politics of Pity: Domesticating Loss in a Russian Province. American Anthropologist 108 (2): 297–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panourgiá, N. 2008. Dangerous Citizens: The Greek Left and the Terror of the State. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prozorov, S. 2007a. Foucault, Freedom and Sovereignty. Aldershot and Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prozorov, S. 2007b. The Unrequited Love of Power: Biopolitical Investment and the Refusal of Care. Foucault Studies 4: 53–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prozorov, S. 2010. Ethos without Nomos: the Russian-Georgian War and the Post-Soviet State of Exception. Ethics and Global Politics 3 (4): 255–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pynnon̲iemi, K., and A. Racz (eds.). 2016. Fog of Falsehood: Russian Strategy of Deception and The Conflict in Ukraine. Helsinki: Ulkopoliittinen Instituutti.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raubisko, I. 2011. Life in a Negative—Positive Space: Moral Transformations in Post-War Chechnya. Ph.D. diss., Institute of Social and Cultural Anthropology, University of Oxford.

  • Richter, A.G. 2015. Legal Response to Propaganda Broadcasts Related to Crisis in and Around Ukraine, 2014–2015. International Journal of Communication 9: 3125–3145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D.W. 2007. Deleuze and The Question of Desire: Toward an Immanent Theory of Ethics. Parrhesia 2: 66–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snegovaya, M. 2015. Putin‘s Information Warfare in Ukraine“, in Russia Report No. 1. Washington DC.: The Institute for the Study of War.

  • Suarez-Orozco, M.M. 1992. A Grammar of Terror: Psychocultural Responses to State Terrorism in Dirty War and Post-Dirty War Argentina. In The Paths to Domination, Resistance, and Terror, ed. C. Nordstrom and J. Martin, 219–259. Berkeley: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. 1998. Return of Guatemala’s Refugees: Reweaving the Torn. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • To, N., and E. Trivelli. 2015. Affect, Memory and the Transmission of Trauma. Subjectivity 8: 305–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkov, V. 2002. Violent Entrepreneurs: The Use of Force in the Making of Russian Capitalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mantas Kvedaravicius.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kvedaravicius, M. Carnal legalities: affective lives within zones of counter-terrorism operation. Subjectivity 11, 339–356 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-018-0060-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-018-0060-3

Keywords

Navigation