Advertisement

Security Journal

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 570–590 | Cite as

Did they report it to stop it? A realist evaluation of the effect of an advertising campaign on victims’ willingness to report unwanted sexual behaviour

  • Reka Solymosi
  • Kerry Cella
  • Andrew Newton
Original Article

Abstract

Tackling unwanted sexual behaviour (USB) on public transport is a concern for transit authorities across the world. However, high rates of underreporting mean a lack of reliable information about USB, presenting a key barrier to prevention. This paper presents a realist evaluation of an initiative called ‘Report It To Stop It’ (RITSI) implemented in London, UK, to tackle underreporting. RITSI aimed to encourage victims to report details of USB incidents to police and transit authorities through media campaigns. Results show that the initiative did increase reporting of USB and that this increase was not due to a rise in the prevalence of USB. Crucially, there was no evidence of any increase in passengers’ fear of crime during the campaign activity. However, the impacts of this campaign were more pronounced in earlier waves, and on certain modes of transport. These findings demonstrate the importance of the context in motivating reporting behaviour change.

Keywords

Underreporting Transport crime Sexual harassment Public transport Unwanted sexual behaviour Crime reporting 

References

  1. Bates, L. 2013. Project guardian: Making public transport safer for women. The Guardian, 01 October 2013, available: https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/the-womens-blog-with-jane-martinson/2013/oct/01/project-guardian-public-transport-safer-women.
  2. Bates, L. 2014. Everyday sexism. Simon & Schuster UK.Google Scholar
  3. Berk, R.A., G.K. Smyth, and L.W. Sherman. 1988. When random assignment fails: Some lessons from the Minneapolis spouse abuse experiment. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 4 (3): 209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowers, K., and S. Johnson. 2005. Using publicity for preventive purposes. In Handbook of crime prevention and community safety, ed. N. Tilley, 329–354.Google Scholar
  5. British Transport Police. 2013. Project Guardian Week of Action.BTP. As viewed 08/03/2017, available: http://www.btp.police.uk/latest_news/project_guardian_week.aspx.
  6. British Transport Police. 2017. Sexual offences. As of: 2017-03-07. Available: http://www.btp.police.uk/advice_and_info/how_we_tackle_crime/sexual_offences.aspx.
  7. CSEW. 2016. Crime in England and Wales: Year ending Mar 2016. ONS Statistical Bulletin. Available: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/bulletins/crimeinenglandandwales/yearendingmar2016. Accessed 22 September 2016.
  8. Department for Transport. 2015. ‘National Travel Survey: 2014’. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/national-travel-survey-2014. Accessed 22 August 2017.
  9. Frederick, P. 2002. Hassled, but helpless. The Hindu. 10 September. Available: http://www.hinduonnet.com/mp/2002/09/10/stories/2002091000070100.htm.
  10. Gekoski, A., J.M. Gray, M.A. Horvath, S. Edwards, A. Emirali, and J.R. Adler. 2015. ‘What works’ in reducing sexual harassment and sexual offences on public transport nationally and internationally: a rapid evidence assessment’. Project Report. Middlesex University; British Transport Police; Department for Transport, London. Retrieved from Middlesex University’s Research Repository at http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/15219/.
  11. Gray, E., J. Jackson, and S. Farrall. 2011. Feelings and functions in the fear of crime: Applying a new approach to victimisation insecurity. British Journal of Criminology 51 (1): 75–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haynes, K., I.A. Eckley, and P. Fearnhead. 2014. Efficient penalty search for multiple changepoint problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.3617.
  13. Heckman, J.J., and J.A. Smith. 1995. Assessing the case for social experiments. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (2): 85–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Herbel, S., and D. Gaines. 2010. Women’s issues in transportation: Summary of the 4th international conference. Conference overview and plenary papers (vol. 46). Transportation Research Board.Google Scholar
  15. HMCPSI & HMIC. 2007. Without consent: A report on the joint review of the investigation and prosecution of rape offences. London: HMIC. Retrieved from http://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmic/media/without-consent-20061231.pdf.
  16. Home Office. 2013. Official statistics: An overview of sexual offending in England and Wales. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/214970/sexual-offending-overview-jan-2013.pdf.
  17. IBM Corporation. 2012. IBM Knowledge Centre: Comparing Column Proportions. SPSS Statistics 21.0.0. Accessed: 6 June 2016. https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLVMB_21.0.0/com.ibm.spss.statistics.help/sig_tests_colprop_ex.htm.
  18. Jafarova, T., S. Campbell, and W.S. Rojas. 2014. AZE: Rapid assessment on sexual harassment in the Baku metro rail—final report. Philippines: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
  19. Johnson, S.D., and K.J. Bowers. 2003. Opportunity is in the eye of the beholder: The role of publicity in crime prevention. Criminology & Public Policy 2 (3): 497–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Killick, R., P. Fearnhead, and I.A. Eckley. 2012. Optimal detection of changepoints with a linear computational cost. JASA 107 (500): 1590–1598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Killick, R., and I. Eckley. 2014. changepoint: An R package for changepoint analysis. Journal of Statistical Software 58 (3): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lim, L. 2002. Sexual assaults in Singapore: a comparative study of rapists and molesters. Medicine, Science and the Law 42 (4): 344–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Loukaitou-Sideris, A. 2014. Fear and safety in transit environments from the women’s perspective. Security Journal 27 (2): 242–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lucas, Karen. 2012. Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? Transport Policy 20: 105–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ministry of Justice, Home Office and Office for National Statistics. 2013. An overview of sexual offending in England and Wales. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/214970/sexual-offending-overview-jan-2013.pdf.
  26. Natarajan, M. 2016. Rapid assessment of “eve teasing”(sexual harassment) of young women during the commute to college In India. Crime Science 5 (1): 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pawson, R., and N. Tilley. 1997. Realistic evaluation. Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Pawson, R., and N. Tilley. 2009. Realist evaluation. Changes.Google Scholar
  29. Shoukry, A., M. Hassan, and N.A. Komsan. 2008. “Clouds in Egypt’s sky’. Sexual harassment: From verbal harassment to rape. Cairo: The Egyptian Center for Women’s Rights.Google Scholar
  30. Sidebottom, A., A. Thorpe, and S.D. Johnson. 2009. Using targeted publicity to reduce opportunities for bicycle theft: A demonstration and replication. European Journal of Criminology 6 (3): 267–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith, M.J. 2008. Addressing the security needs of women passengers on public transport. Security Journal 21 (1–2): 117–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith, M.J., and R.V. Clarke. 2000. Crime and public transport. Crime and Justice 27: 169–233.Google Scholar
  33. Stringer, Scott M. 2007. Hidden in plain sight: Sexual harassment and assault in the New York City subway system. Office of the Manhattan Borough President, 2007.Google Scholar
  34. TfL. 2015. “Safety and security annual report 2014”. Available: http://content.tfl.gov.uk/safety-and-security-annual-report-2014-15.pdf. Accessed: 10/10/2016.
  35. Wilson, E.B. 1927. Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association 22: 209–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ManchesterManchesterUK
  2. 2.Transport for LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.University of LeicesterLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations