Skip to main content
Log in

Credit default prediction modeling: an application of support vector machine

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Risk Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Credit default prediction (CDP) modeling is a fundamental and critical issue for financial institutions. However, the previous studies indicate that the classifier’s performances in CDP analysis differ using different performance criterions on different databases under different circumstances. The performance assessment exercise under a set of criteria remains understudied in nature, on the one hand, and the real–scenario is not taken into account in that a single/very limited number of measure only are used, on the other hand. These problems affect the ability to make a consistent conclusion. Therefore, the aim of this study is to address this methodological issue by applying support vector machine (SVM)-based CDP algorithm by means of a set of representative performance criterions, with enclosing some novel performance measures, its performance compare with the results gained by statistical and intelligent approaches using six different types of databases from the credit prediction domains. Experimental results show that SVM model is marginally superior to CART with DA, being more robust than its other counterparts. In consequence, this study recommends that the supremacy of a classifier is linked to the way in which evaluations are measured.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akkoc, S. 2012. An Empirical Comparison of Conventional Techniques, Neural Networks and the Three Stage Hybrid Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) Model for Credit Scoring Analysis: the Case of Turkish Credit Card Data. European Journal of Operational Research 222: 168–178. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2012.04.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ala’raj, M., and M.F. Abbod. 2016. Classifiers Consensus System Approach for Credit Scoring. Applied Soft Computing 144: 89–105. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2016.04.013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arisawa, M., and J. Watada. 1994. Enhanced Learning in Neural Networks and its Application to Financial Statement Analysis. Paper presented at IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks.

  • Biggerstaff, B.J. 2000. Comparing Diagnostic Tests: A Simple Graphic Using Likelihood Ratios. Statistics in Medicine 19: 649–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blakeley, D., and E. Oddone. 1995. Noninvasive Carotid Artery Testing. Annals of Internal Medicine 122: 360–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M.Y. 2011. Bankruptcy Prediction in Firms with Statistical and Intelligent Techniques and a Comparison of Evolutionary Computation Approaches. Computers and Mathematics with Applications 62: 4514–4524. doi:10.1016/j.camwa.2011.10.030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherkassky, V., and Y. Ma. 2004. Practical Selection of SVM Parameters and Noise Estimation for SVM Regression. Neural Networks 17 (1): 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferri, C., J.H. Orallo, and R. Modroiu. 2009. An Experimental Comparison of Performance Measures for Classification. Pattern Recognition Letters 30: 27–38. doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2008.08.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, H., and E. García. 2009. Learning from Imbalanced Data. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 21: 1263–1284. doi:10.1109/TKDE.2008.239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Y.C., and J. Ansell. 2007. Measuring Retail Company Performance Using Credit Scoring Techniques. European Journal of Operational Research 183: 1595–1606. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.09.101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S., D. Johnstone, and R. Wilson. 2015. An Empirical Evaluation of the Performance of Binary Classifiers in the Prediction of Credit Ratings Changes. Journal of Banking & Finance 56: 72–85. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.02.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khashei, M., A.Z. Hamadani, and M. Bijari. 2012. A Novel Hybrid Classification Model of Artificial Neural Networks and Multiple Linear Regression Models. Expert Systems with Applications 39: 2606–2620. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T.S., and I.F. Chen. 2005. A Two-Stage Hybrid Credit Scoring Model Using Artificial Neural Networks and Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines. Expert Systems with Applications 28: 743–752. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2004.12.031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichman, M. 2013. uci machine learning repository. http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/.

  • Musa, A.B. 2013. Comparative Study on Classification Performance Between Support Vector Machine and Logistic Regression. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics 4: 13–24. doi:10.1007/s13042-012-0068-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nanda, S., and P. Pendharkar. 2001. Linear Models for Minimizing Misclassification Costs in Bankruptcy Prediction. International Journal of Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance & Management 10: 155–168. doi:10.1002/isaf.203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, L.C., E.P. Castaño, and C.R. Samblás. 2016. Quality Performance Metrics in Multivariate Classification Methods for Qualitative Analysis. Trends in Analytical Chemistry 80: 612–624. doi:10.1016/j.trac.2016.04.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, S.M., and I.A. Strebulaev. 2008. Structural Models of Credit Risk are Useful: Evidence from Hedge Ratios on Corporate Bonds. Journal of Financial Economics 90: 1–19. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.10.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokolova, M., and G. Lapalme. 2009. A Systematic Analysis of Performance Measures for Classification Tasks. Information Processing and Management 45: 427–437. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2009.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, J., and H. Li. 2012. Financial Distress Prediction Using Support Vector Machines: Ensemble Vs Individual. Applied Soft Computing 12: 2254–2265. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2012.03.028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinoco, M.H., and N. Wilson. 2013. Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction among Listed Companies Using Accounting, Market and Macroeconomic Variables. International Review of Financial Analysis 30: 394–419. doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2013.02.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Gestel, T., B. Baesens, J.A.K. Suykens, D. Van den Poel, D. Baestaens, and M. Willekens. 2006. Bayesian Kernel Based Classification for Financial Distress Detection. European Journal of Operational Research 172: 979–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vapnik, V.N. 1995. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vapnik, V.N. 1998. Statistical Learning Theory. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidakovic, B. 2011. Statistics for Bioengineering Sciences: With MATLAB and WinBUGS Support. New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-0394-4_3.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • West, D. 2000. Neural Network Credit Scoring Models. Computers & Operations Research 27: 1131–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youden, W. 1950. Index for Rating Diagnostic Tests. Cancer 3: 32–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, H., C. Miao, Z. Shen, and Y. Feng. 2014. Comparing the Learning Effectiveness of BP, ELM, I-ELM, and SVM for Corporate Credit Ratings. Neurocomputing 128: 285–295. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2013.02.054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, L., K.K. Lai, and Yu. Lean. 2010. Least Squares Support Vector Machines Ensemble Models for Credit Scoring. Expert Systems with Applications 37: 127–133. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2009.05.024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to the editor-in-chief, Igor Loncarski; managing editors; and anonymous reviewers for their substantial contribution because with their assistance the manuscript has been significantly improved. The research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71171031 and 71471027), National Social Science Foundation of China (16BTJ017), Social Science Foundation of Liaoning province of China (L16BJY016), Credit Risks Rating System and Loan Pricing Project of Small Enterprises for Bank of Dalian (2012–2001) and Credit Risks Evaluation and Loan Pricing For Petty Loan Funded for the Head Office of Postal Savings Bank of China (2009–2007). We thank the organizations mentioned above.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chi Guotai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of the paper.

Additional information

Fahmida E. Moula, Chi Guotai and Mohammad Zoynul Abedin have contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moula, F.E., Guotai, C. & Abedin, M.Z. Credit default prediction modeling: an application of support vector machine. Risk Manag 19, 158–187 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41283-017-0016-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41283-017-0016-x

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation