Skip to main content
Log in

The “new psychic economy” according to Charles Melman

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The “new psychic economy” is a concept of Charles Melman, who passed away in 2022. A French psychoanalyst and one of the principal followers of Lacan, Melman’s new psychic economy was his way of trying to explain the social changes of recent decades and their consequences, mainly in the field of psychoanalytic clinics. This paper is also inspired by other works, in particular those of the Belgian psychoanalyst Jean-Pierre Lebrun, a member of the Association Lacanienne Internationale, the school founded by Melman. His central argument is that the social link is submitted to a neoliberal requirement of unlimited pleasure that prevents symbolic castration from being functional.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Marcel Gauchet is a French historian and sociologist, disciple of Claude Lefort, Director of Studies emeritus at the École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales (Centre de recherches politiques Raymond Aron), and former editor-in-chief of the journal Le Débat, one of France’s leading intellectual journals, which he founded with Pierre Nora in 1980 and which ceased publication in 2020.

  2. Lyotard was an active supporter of the Marxist-oriented movement “Socialisme ou Barbarie” with Cornelius Castoriadis, Guy Debord, Jean Laplanche, Claude Lefort, Pierre Soury and many others.

  3. On this topic, see the article in this tribute on Charles Melman’s concept of the party wall phenomenon (Dimitriadis & Thibierge, in press) and issues 51 and 52 of the Journal Français de Psychiatrie, “Le mur mitoyen dans la clinique des psychoses” (The party wall in the psychosis clinic), both published in 2023.

  4. On the topic of the failure to diagnosis a condition during prenatal checks, see issue 17 of the Journal Français de Psychiatrie, “L’arrêt Perruche ou les problèmes posés par la biologie au droit” (The Perruche decision or the legal problems posed by biology), which was published in 2002.

  5. In Civilisation and Its Discontents, Freud (1930/1961) argued that the “psychological misery of the masses” is most dangerous where the social bond is created mainly through the identification of participants with each other, while the individuality of the leaders does not acquire the degree of importance required for the creation of the mass. He saw American civilisation as an example of this dangerous mode of mass creation.

  6. Colette Soler was in conversation with Melman during the congress on the end of analysis held in Paris as part of the winter seminar of the International Lacanian Association, 27–28 February 2012. Details of the dialogue taken from personal notes.

  7. Atopia is derived from the Greek άτποία, which means “what has no designated place”.

  8. In January 1964, Octave Mannoni (2003) published an article in Les Temps modernes in which he set out his thoughts on the workings of belief and denial, conceptualised by Freud but considered marginal themes in psychoanalysis. He examines the commonplace expression “Je sais bien, mais quand même …” (I know well, but all the same …), placing it at the heart of the issues surrounding the Freudian term Verleugnung (“denial of reality”).

References

  • Cacciali, J.-L. (2009). L’anorexique-boulimique, une tentative de faire Un [The anorexic-bulimic, an attempt to be One]. La célibataire, 18, 31–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacciali, J.-L. (2022). With Freud and Lacan: hysteria, anorexia/bulimia, and other contemporary clinical questions. In D. Busiol (Ed.), Lacanian psychoanalysis in practice: Insights from fourteen psychoanalysts (pp. 99–115). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castel, P.-H. (2004). Propos sobres sur une supposée « nouvelle économie » du psychisme et de la sexualité [Sober comments on a supposed new economy of the psyche and sexuality]. Comprendre, 6. http://pierrehenri.castel.free.fr/Articles/Melman.htm

  • Chaumon, F. (2009). Sujet de l’inconscient, subjectivité politique? [Subject of the unconscious, political subjectivity?] Essaim, 22(1), 7–22.

  • Czermak, M. (1998). Patronymies: Considérations cliniques sur les psychoses [Patronymies: Clinical considerations on psychoses]. Masson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitriadis, Y. (2021). Medical, psychoanalytical, and political thoughts on a shared obsessional neurosis. Journal for the Psychoanalysis of Culture & Society, 26(4), 548–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitriadis, Y. (2023). L’angoisse, l’objet et l’actualité des névroses actuelles [Anguish, the object and the actuality of actual neuroses]. Psychologie Clinique, 55(1), 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitriadis, Y., & Thibierge, S. (in press). Psychopathological ramifications of Charles Melman’s “party wall phenomenon”. Journal for the Psychoanalysis of Culture & Society.

  • Dufour, D.-R. (1990). Les Mystères de la trinité [The mysteries of the trinity]. Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufour, D.-R. (2011). L’individu qui vient… après le libéralisme [The individual after liberalism]. Denoël.

  • Dufour, D.-R., & Laval, C. (2009). Rencontre avec Charles Melman autour du livre La nouvelle économie psychique [Meeting with Charles Melman to discuss the book The New Psychic Economy]. La célibataire, 18, 97–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, A. (1998). La fatigue d’être soi: Dépression et société [The fatigue of being oneself: Depression and society]. Odile Jacob.

  • Freud, S. (1955). Group psychology and the analysis of the ego. In J. Strachey (Ed.), Standard edition: Vol. 18 (pp. 69–143). Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1921)

  • Freud, S. (1961). Civilization and its discontents. In J. Strachey (Ed.), Standard edition: Vol. 21 (pp. 64–147). Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1930)

  • Freud, S. (1964a). New introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. In J. Strachey (Ed.), Standard edition: Vol. 22 (pp. 1–182). Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1933)

  • Freud, S. (1964b). Moses and the monotheism: Three essays. In J. Strachey (Ed.), Standard edition: Vol. 23 (pp. 3–137). Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1939)

  • Gauchet, M. (1998). La religion dans la démocratie [Religion in democracy]. Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, A. (1990). La folie privée: psychanalyse de cas-limites [Private madness: psychoanalysis of borderline cases]. Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (1966). Écrits. Seuil.

  • Lacan, J. (2010). Les non-dupes errent: Séminaire 1973–1974 [Those who are not fooled roam: Seminar 1973–1974]. Éditions de l’Association Lacanienne International.

  • Lacan, J. (2023). L’envers de la psychanalyse: Séminaire 1969–1970 [The other side of psychoanalysis: Seminar 1969–1970]. Éditions de l’Association Lacanienne International.

  • Lebrun, J.-P. (1997). Un monde sans limites: Essai pour une clinique psychanalytique du social [A world without limits: Essay for a psychoanalytic clinic of the social]. Érès.

  • Lebrun, J.-P. (2007). La Perversion ordinaire [The ordinary perversion]. Denoël.

  • Lebrun, J.-P. (2009). Enfant de la seule mère [Child of only mother]. La célibataire, 18, 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.-F. (1979). La condition postmoderne: Rapport sur le savoir [The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge]. Minuit.

  • Mannoni, O. (2003). “I know well, but all the same … ” (G. M. Goshgarian, Trans.). In M. A. Rothenberg, D. A. Foster & S. Žižek (Eds.), Perversion and the social relation (pp. 68–91). Duke University Press. (Original work published 1964)

  • Melman, C. (1997). La notion de limite [The notion of limits]. Le Bulletin Freudien, 29, 179–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melman, C. (2002). L’homme sans gravité: Jouir à tout prix [Man without gravity: Enjoy at all costs]. Denoël.

  • Melman, C. (2010). La nouvelle économie psychique: La façon de penser et de jouir aujourd’hui [The new psychic economy: The way of thinking and enjoying today]. Érès.

  • Melman, C., & Lebrun J.-P. (2022). La dysphorie de genre: À quoi se tenir pour ne pas glisser? [Gender dysphoria: What to look out for so as not to slip]. Érès.

  • Porge, E. (2009). Un sujet sans subjectivité [A subject without subjectivity]. Essaim, 22(1), 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Clémence Sebag has translated the article and all the quotations from authors writing in French.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yorgos Dimitriadis.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dimitriadis, Y. The “new psychic economy” according to Charles Melman. Psychoanal Cult Soc 29, 75–89 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41282-023-00423-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41282-023-00423-3

Keywords

Navigation