Skip to main content
Log in

Gower’s blushing bird, Philomela’s transforming face

  • Article
  • Published:
postmedieval: a journal of medieval cultural studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The blushing face is the clearest sign of shame in medieval literature. But what happens when a blushing human is transformed into an animal? Such a metamorphosis raises questions about the embodiment of emotional experience and expression in the human form. Gower’s expansion on the metamorphosis of Philomela from a woman to a nightingale in Book V of the Confessio Amantis explores Philomela’s reconfiguring of the experience of shame as a direct result of her transformation. Is it the feeling of shame itself, or the act of blushing, that takes ontological priority? Gower’s association of Philomela’s loss of ‘face’ or honor with the loss of her human face reveals the entanglement of her human and animal identities and emotions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Quotations of Confessio Amantis are taken from Gower (1901 [repr. 1969]) and cited by book and line number.

  2. See Harbert (1972), Mainzer (1972), and McKinley (2007, 124–126).

  3. English translation by the author.

  4. Speech (as opposed to mere noise) was often considered a distinctively human ability (Steel, 2008, 15, 24, note 47; Eco et al., 1989).

  5. The words ‘Philomela’ and ‘nightingale’ could function as shorthand for one another in medieval tradition, although nightingales were not always female in medieval texts (Pfeffer, 1985, 27–32, 157–168; Williams, 1997).

  6. Kay also uses the term ‘hyper-legibility’ to describe the face’s role in the negotiation of identity (Kay, 2011, 28).

  7. A Middle English word that likely means ‘nobody’ rather than ‘no male adult’ (see MED, s. v. man).

References

  • Allen, V. 2005. Waxing Red: Shame and the Body, Shame and the Soul. In The Representation of Women’s Emotions in Medieval and Early Modern Culture, ed. L. Perfetti, 191–210. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, T. 1964. Commentary on the Nicomachean Ethics, trans. C. I. Litzinger. 2 vols. Chicago, IL: Henry Regnery. http://dhspriory.org/thomas/Ethics.htm.

  • Aquinas, T. 1969. Sententia Libri Ethicorum, Opera Omnia, 47/1, 47/2. 2 vols. Rome, Italy: Leonine Commission. http://www.corpusthomisticum.org/repedleo.html.

  • Brewer, W. 1933. Ovid’s Metamorphoses in European Culture. Boston, MA: Cornhill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casebier, K. 2001. Ovid’s Medieval Metamorphosis: Techniques of Persuasion in Chrétien de Troyes’ Philomela. Philological Quarterly 80: 441–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaucer, G. 2008. The Parliament of Fowls. In The Riverside Chaucer, 3rd ed., eds. L. D. Benson et al., 383–394. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, S. 2007. For the Birds: The Biennial Chaucer Lecture. Studies in the Age of Chaucer 29: 23–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, S. 2013. Animal Encounters: Contacts and Concepts in Medieval Britain. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • de Mur, G. 1853. In Guiraut Riquiers, ed. S. L. H. Pfaff, vol. 4 in C. A. F. Mahn, Die Werke der Troubadours. Berlin, Germany: Duemmler.

  • Diogenes Laertius. 1925. Lives of Eminent Philosophers, trans. R. D. Hicks. 2 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Eco, U., R. Lambertini, C. Marmo, and A. Tabarroni. 1989. On Animal Language in the Medieval Classification of Signs. In On the Medieval Theory of Signs, eds. U. Eco and C. Marmo, 3–41. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: J. Benjamins.

  • Forbes Irving, P.M.C. 1990. Metamorphosis in Greek Myths. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geoffrey of Vinsauf. 1967. Poetria Nova, trans. M. F. Nims. Toronto, Canada: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.

  • Gower, J. [1901] 1969. Confessio Amantis, ed. G. C. Macaulay. EETS e.s. 81 and 82. 2 vols. London: Oxford University Press.

  • Harbert, B. 1972. The Myth of Tereus in Ovid and Gower. Medium Ævum 41: 208–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isidore of Seville. 1986. Etymologies: Livre XII, Des animaux, ed. and trans. by J. André. Paris, France: Belles Lettres.

  • James I of Scotland. 2003. The Kingis Quair. In Fifteenth-Century English Dream Visions, ed. J. Boffey, 94–157. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

  • Kay, S. 2011. Legible skins: Animals and the ethics of reading. postmedieval 2(1): 13–32.

  • Knuutila, S. 2002. Medieval Theories of the Passions of the Soul. In Emotions and Choice from Boethius to Descartes, eds. H. Lagerlund and M. Yrjönsuuri, 49–83. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Leach, E.E. 2007. Sung Birds: Music, Nature, and Poetry in the Later Middle Ages. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lydgate, J. 1998. Troy Book: Selections, ed. R. R. Edwards. Kalamazoo, MI: The Medieval Institute.

  • Mainzer, C. 1972. John Gower’s Use of the ‘Mediaeval Ovid’ in the Confessio Amantis. Medium Ævum 41: 215–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middle English Dictionary (MED), http://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/med/.

  • McKinley, K. 2007. Lessons for a King from Gower’s Confessio Amantis. In Metamorphosis: The Changing Face of Ovid in Medieval and Early Modern Europe, eds. A. Keith and S. Rupp, 107–128. Toronto, Canada: Centre for Reformation and Renaissance Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford English Dictionary (OED), http://www.oed.com/.

  • Ovid. 1951. Metamorphosis I, ed. and trans. F. J. Miller. The Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Pfeffer, W. 1985. The Change of Philomel: The Nightingale in Medieval Literature. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seaman, M. 2007. Becoming More (than) Human: Affective Posthumanisms, Past and Future. Journal of Narrative Theory 37(2): 246–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, C. 2014. Lydgate’s Jailbird. Studies in the Age of Chaucer 36: 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanbury, S. 2011. Posthumanist theory and the premodern animal sign. postmedieval 2(1): 101–114.

  • Steel, K. 2008. How to Make a Human. Exemplaria 20: 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevisa, J. 1975. On the Properties of Things: John Trevisa’s Translation of Bartholomaeus Anglicus De Proprietatibus Rerum, eds. M. C. Seymour, et al. 2 vols. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

  • Williams, J. 1997. Interpreting Nightingales: Gender, Class and Histories. Sheffield, UK: Sheffield Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, T. 2011. Inventing Womanhood: Gender and Language in Later Middle English Writing. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wycliffe, J. 1850. The Holy Bible, Containing the Old and New Testaments …, eds. J. Forshall and F. Madden. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

  • Yamamoto, D. 2000. The Boundaries of the Human in Medieval English Literature. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to Sarah Jane Brazil, Einat Klafter, and Katie Walter for their patient feedback on my early thoughts regarding blushing birds, and to Stephanie Trigg and Stephanie Downes for their editorial suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Flannery, M.C. Gower’s blushing bird, Philomela’s transforming face. Postmedieval 8, 35–50 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41280-016-0036-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41280-016-0036-9

Navigation