Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exploring the role of human capital, renewal capital and entrepreneurial capital in innovation performance in high-tech and low-tech firms

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Knowledge Management Research & Practice

Abstract

According to past research, intellectual capital (IC) is a key driver of innovation performance and subsequent competitive advantage. Given the human nature of innovation activities (i.e. human beings produce innovations), human capital (HC) deserves special attention. Although researchers in the past have analysed the HC–innovation linkage, we still do not have a detailed understanding of how specific human capabilities affect innovation. Furthermore, the technology level of the firm could generate major differences in the HC–innovation relationship as it influences both the type of knowledge prevalent within the company and the radicalness of the innovations developed. Nevertheless, former literature has largely omitted technology level when studying the IC–innovation linkage. To fill this research gap, this study examines the role of human attributes, including knowledge, skills and motivation (i.e. traditional HC), learning capability (i.e. renewal capital) and entrepreneurial attitude (i.e. entrepreneurial capital) on innovation in high-tech versus low-tech companies. To that end, survey data from 180 Spanish companies were analysed by means of structural equation modelling based on partial least squares. The results obtained confirm that the influence of HC, renewal capital and entrepreneurial capital on innovation differs depending on the technology level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alegre, J., and R. Chiva. 2013. Linking entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: The role of organizational learning capability and innovation performance. Journal of Small Business Management 51 (4): 491–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alegre, J., J. Pla-Barber, R. Chiva, and C. Villar. 2012. Organisational learning capability, product innovation performance and export intensity. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 24 (5): 511–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aragón-Correa, J.A., V.J. García-Morales, and E. Cordón-Pozo. 2007. Leadership and organizational learning’s role on innovation and performance: Lessons from Spain. Industrial Marketing Management 36 (3): 349–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bontis, N. 1998. Intellectual capital: An exploratory study that develops measures and models. Management Decision 36 (2): 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornay-Barrachina, M., D. la Rosa-Navarro, A. López-Cabrales, and R. Valle-Cabrera. 2012. Employment relationships and firm innovation: The double role of human capital. British Journal of Management 23 (2): 223–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabello-Medina, C., Á. López-Cabrales, and R. Valle-Cabrera. 2011. Leveraging the innovative performance of human capital through HRM and social capital in Spanish firms. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 22 (4): 807–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calisir, F., C.A. Gumussoy, and E. Guzelsoy. 2013. Impacts of learning orientation on product innovation performance. The Learning Organization 20 (3): 176–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camelo-Ordaz, C., A. Perez-Luno, and E. Sousa-Ginel. 2009. The impact of market and entrepreneurial orientation on innovativeness: An empirical assessment. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management 10 (3–4): 243–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cesaroni, F.M., M. Del Baldo, P. Demartini, and P. Paoloni. 2015. Entrepreneurial, renewal and trust capital of Italian firms: Insights from an empirical study. International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning 4 (1): 69–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., X. Zhao, and Y. Wang. 2015. A new measurement of intellectual capital and its impact on innovation performance in an open innovation paradigm. International Journal of Technology Management 67 (1): 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W., and T. Frye. 2003. PLS-graph version 3.00. Build 1017. Texas: University of Houston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W.M., and D.A. Levinthal. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1): 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Carolis, D.M. 2010. Technological characteristics of industries. In Encyclopedia of technology and innovation management, ed. V.K. Narayanan, and G. Colarelli-O’Connor, 77–79. West Sussex: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Winne, S., and L. Sels. 2010. Interrelationships between human capital, HRM and innovation in Belgian start-ups aiming at an innovation strategy. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 21 (11): 1863–1883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Plessis, M. 2007. The role of knowledge management in innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management 11 (4): 20–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edvinsson, L., and M. Malone. 1997. Intellectual capital: Realising your company’s true value by finding its hidden brainpower. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, T. 2002. Entrepreneurial capital: The emerging venture’s most important asset and competitive advantage. Journal of Business Venturing 17: 275–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, R.F., and N.B. Miller. 1992. A primer for soft modeling. Ohio: University of Akron Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Mesa, A., and J. Alegre. 2015. Entrepreneurial orientation and export intensity: Examining the interplay of organizational learning and innovation. International Business Review 24 (1): 148–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, L., and O. Sorenson. 2001. Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data. Research Policy 30 (7): 1019–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galunic, D.C., and S. Rodan. 1998. Resource recombinations in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management Journal 19 (12): 1193–1201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargadon, A., and R.I. Sutton. 1997. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly 42 (1997): 716–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, Y.H., and W. Fang. 2009. Intellectual capital and new product development performance: The mediating role of organizational learning capability. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76 (5): 664–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, R.F., and G.T.M. Hult. 1998. Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination. The Journal of Marketing 62: 42–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkinen, H., A. Kianto, M. Vanhala, and P. Ritala. 2017. Structure of intellectual capital—An international comparison. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability 30 (5): 1160–1183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, J., S. Wang, and S. Zhao. 2012. Does HRM facilitate employee creativity and organizational innovation? A study of Chinese firms. International Journal of Human Resource Management 23: 4025–4047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kianto, A. 2008. Development and validation of a survey instrument for measuring organisational renewal capability. International Journal of Technology Management 42 (1–2): 69–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kianto, A., P. Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, and P. Ritala. 2010. Intellectual capital in service-and product-oriented companies. Journal of Intellectual Capital 11 (3): 305–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollmann, T., and C. Stöckmann. 2014. Filling the entrepreneurial orientation–performance gap: The mediating effects of exploratory and exploitative innovations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 38 (5): 1001–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P.M. 2005. A comparison of ownership structures and innovations of US and Japanese firms. Managerial and Decision Economics 26: 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leitner, K.H. 2011. The effect of intellectual capital on product innovativeness in SMEs. International Journal of Technology Management 53 (1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., H. Guo, Y. Yi, and Y. Liu. 2010. Ownership concentration and product innovation in Chinese firms: The mediating role of learning orientation. Management and Organization Review 6 (1): 77–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin, G.T., and G.G. Dess. 1996. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review 21 (1): 135–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín-de Castro, G., M. Delgado-Verde, J. Amores-Salvadó, and J.E. Navas-López. 2013. Linking human, technological, and relational assets to technological innovation: Exploring a new approach. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 11: 123–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R., and G. Wright. 1992. The rise and fall of American technological leadership: The postwar era in historical perspective. Journal of Economic Literature 30 (4): 1931–1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., and H. Takeuchi. 1995. The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B. 1994. Innovation and diffusion in small firms: Theory and evidence. Small Business Economics 6: 327–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry, Economic Analysis and Statistics Division. 2011. ISIC Rev.3 Technology intensity definition—Classification of manufacturing industries into categories based on R&D intensities.

  • Petty, R., and J. Guthrie. 2000. Intellectual capital literature review: Measurement, reporting and management. Journal of Intellectual Capital 1 (2): 155–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, K., M. Lubatkin, and N. Srinivasan. 2006. Proposing and testing an intellectual capital-based view of the firm. Journal of Management Studies 43 (4): 867–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roos, J., G. Roos, N.C. Dragonetti, and L. Edvinsson. 1998. Intellectual capital: Navigating in the new business landscape. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbloom, J.L. 2010. Technology evolution. In Encyclopedia of technology and innovation management, ed. V.K. Narayanan, and G. Colarelli-O’Connor, 9–17. West Sussex: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilling, M. 2011. Strategic management of technological innovation, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, R.S. 1986. Fostering and facilitating entrepreneurship in organizations: Implications for organization structure and human resource management practices. Human Resource Management 25 (4): 607–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. 1934. The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle (Vol. 55). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction publishers.

  • Shum, P., and G. Lin. 2010. A resource-based view on entrepreneurship and innovation. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management 11 (3): 264–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, H.H., and J.C. Jarillo. 1990. A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal 11 (1990): 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramaniam, M., and M.A. Youndt. 2005. The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal 48 (3): 450–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tidd, J., J. Bessant, and K. Pavitt. 2005. Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change, 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, D., and S. Chen. 2013. Does intellectual capital matter? High-performance work systems and bilateral innovative capabilities. International Journal of Manpower 34 (8): 861–879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weerawardena, J. 2003. Exploring the role of market learning capability in competitive strategy. European Journal of Marketing 37 (3/4): 407–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P., G. McMahon, and A. McWilliams. 1994. Human resources and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based perspective. International Journal of Human Resource Management 3: 301–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, S.K.-S. 2014. Impacts of environmental turbulence on entrepreneurial orientation and new product success. European Journal of Innovation Management 17 (2): 229–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, W.Y., M.L. Chang, and C.W. Chen. 2008. Promoting innovation through the accumulation of intellectual capital, social capital, and entrepreneurial orientation. R&D Management 38 (3): 265–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S.H., L.Y. Lin, and M.Y. Hsu. 2007. Intellectual capital, dynamic capabilities and innovative performance of organizations. International Journal of Technology Management 39 (3–4): 279–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youndt, M.A., M. Subramaniam, and S.A. Snell. 2004. Intellectual capital profiles: An examination of investments and returns. Journal of Management Studies 41 (2): 335–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Strategy & Information Systems, Deusto Business School, University of Deusto, Pº Mundaiz, 50, 20012, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain

    Marta Buenechea-Elberdin

  2. Department of Management and International Business, School of Business and Management, Lappeenranta University of Technology, Skinnarilankatu 34, 53850, Lappeenranta, Finland

    Marta Buenechea-Elberdin & Aino Kianto

  3. Department of Finance & Accountancy, Deusto Business School, University of Deusto, Pº Mundaiz, 50, 20012, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain

    Josune Sáenz

Authors
  1. Marta Buenechea-Elberdin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Josune Sáenz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aino Kianto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marta Buenechea-Elberdin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Buenechea-Elberdin, M., Sáenz, J. & Kianto, A. Exploring the role of human capital, renewal capital and entrepreneurial capital in innovation performance in high-tech and low-tech firms. Knowl Manage Res Pract 15, 369–379 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41275-017-0069-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41275-017-0069-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation