Skip to main content
Log in

Distress among disaster-affected populations: delay in relief provision

  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

Central to humanitarian logistics is the minimization of distress among impacted populations in the aftermath of a disaster. In this paper, we characterize two levels of distress, termed criticality and destitution, with respect to the delay provision of relief items. Delay in provision of a relief item will lead to destitution for a tolerable number of days, beyond which it will lead to criticality. We develop a mixed-integer goal program that quantifies these two metrics with respect to the number of days without provision of each of a set of relief items. The model determines the allocation of resources and the distribution of available relief items in a manner that minimizes criticality and destitution in affected population segments. The use of the model is demonstrated for the aftermath of a catastrophic earthquake in Istanbul, expected to occur by 2030.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altay N, Green W (2006). ORMS research in disaster operations management. European Journal of Operational Research 175(1): 475–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balcik B, Beamon BM, and Smilowitz K (2008). Last mile distribution in humanitarian relief. Journal of Intelligent Distribution Systems 12(2): 51–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dessouky M, Ordonez F, Jia H, and Shen Z (2006). Rapid distribution of medical supplies. Delay Management in Health Care Systems, pp. 309–338.

  • Galindo G and Batta R (2013). Review of recent developments in OR/MS research in disaster operations management. European Journal of Operational Research 230(2): 201–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gormez N, Koksalan M, and Salman, FS (2011). Locating disaster response facilities in Istanbul. Journal of the Operational Research Society 62(7): 1239–1252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holguin-Veras J, Perez N, Jaller M, Van Wassenhove LN, and Aros-Vera F (2013). On the appropriate objective function for post-disaster humanitarian logistics models. Journal of Operations Management 31(5): 262–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holguin-Veras J, Perez N (2010). Need to reformulate humanitarian logistics modeling to explicitly consider social costs. Transportation Research Board 89th Annual Meeting.

  • Huang M, Smilowitz K, and Balcik B (2011). Models for relief routing: Equity, efficiency and efficacy. Transportation Research Part E 48(1): 2–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia H, Ordonez F, and Dessouky M (2007). A Modeling Framework for Facility Location of Medical Services for Large-Scale Emergencies. IIE Transactions 39(1): 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Japan International Cooperation Agency JICA, Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality (2002). The study on a disaster prevention/mitigation basic plan in Istanbul including seismic microzonation in the Republic of Turkey. Technical Report.

  • Natarajarathinam M, Capar I, and Narayanan A (2009). Managing supply chains in times of crisis: a review of literature and insights. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 39(7): 535–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozdamar L, Ekinci E, and Kucukyazici B (2004). Emergency logistics planning in natural disasters. Annals of Operations Research 129(1–4): 217–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons P (2009). Heightened Odds of Large Earthquakes Near Istanbul: An Interaction-Based Probability Calculation. Science 288(5466): 661–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez Rodriguez N (2011). Inventory allocation models for post-disaster humanitarian logistics with explicit consideration of deprivation costs.

  • Rawls CG and Turnquist M (2010). Pre-positioning of emergency supplies for disaster response. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 44(4): 521–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls CG and Turnquist M (2012). Pre-positioning and dynamic delivery planning for short-term response following a natural disaster. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 46(1): 46–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng GH, Cheng HJ, and Huang TD (2007). Multi-objective optimal planning for designing relief delivery systems. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 43(6): 673–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi W and Ozdamar L (2007). A dynamic logistics coordination model for evacuation and support in disaster response activities. European Journal of Operational Research 179(3): 1177–1193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yushimito WF, Jaller M, and Ukkusuri S (2010). A Voronoi-based heuristic algorithm for locating distribution centers in disasters. Networks and Spatial Economics 12(1): 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agha Iqbal Ali.

Additional information

“Relief material for Jammu & Kashmir lies in neglect on railway platforms.”—The Indian Express, 9-24-2014.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, A.I., Ince, G. Distress among disaster-affected populations: delay in relief provision. J Oper Res Soc 68, 533–543 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41274-016-0015-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41274-016-0015-4

Keywords

Navigation