Advertisement

“On-demand” pricing and capacity management in cloud computing

  • Tarun Jain
  • Jishnu Hazra
Research Article
  • 60 Downloads

Abstract

In recent business practice, firms, to fulfill their IT requirements, are using both dedicated “on-premise” capacity infrastructure and “on-demand” capacity requirements provided by companies such as AWS, OpenStack, and VMware. In this research, we analyze the scenario where a business first invests in “on-premise” (or in-house) capacity and also procures the excess demand requirements through the public cloud provider utilizing the pay-as-you-go pricing model. We study the impact of factors such as demand correlation in buyers’ market and demand load profile on the capacity decision. We find various cloud computing strategies and link them with real-life business practices.

Keywords

“On-demand” capacity pricing Cloud computing Infrastructure as a Service “On-premise” capacity investments “On-demand” capacity sourcing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are indebted to the editor Professor Ian Yeoman and anonymous referees for their valuable comments and helpful suggestions that improved this paper. The second author gratefully acknowledges the funding support received from the AIRBUS Group Endowed Chair for Sourcing and Supply Management at Indian Institute of Management Bangalore for this research. The first author is grateful for the constructive suggestions made by Gunjeet Singh Mahal.

References

  1. Accenture. 2016. Accenture Cloud Platform, Accenture Operations blog article. https://www.accenture.com/us-en/cloud-platform-management
  2. Ang, S., and D.W. Straub. 1998. Production and transaction economies and IS outsourcing: A study of the US banking industry. MIS Quarterly 22 (4): 535–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anupindi, R., and L. Jiang. 2008. Capacity investment under postponement strategies, market competition, and demand uncertainty. Management Science 54 (11): 1876–1890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. AWS. 2017a. Johnson & Johnson Case Study, AWS Case studies. https://aws.amazon.com/solutions/case-studies/johnson-and-johnson/
  5. AWS. 2017b. MLB Advanced Media Case Study, AWS Case studies. https://aws.amazon.com/solutions/case-studies/major-league-baseball-mlbam/
  6. Apte, U.M., M.G. Sobol, S. Hanaoka, T. Shimada, T. Saarinen, T. Salmela, and A.P. Vepsalainen. 1997. IS outsourcing practices in the USA, Japan and Finland: A comparative study. Journal of Information Technology 12 (4): 289–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Balasubramanian, S., S. Bhattacharya, and V.V. Krishnan. 2015. Pricing information goods: A strategic analysis of the selling and pay-per-use mechanisms. Marketing Science 34 (2): 218–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barua, A., C.H. Kriebel, and T. Mukhopadhyay. 1991. An economic analysis of strategic information technology investments. MIS Quarterly 15 (3): 313–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Becker-Peth, M., E. Katok, and U.W. Thonemann. 2013. Designing buyback contracts for irrational but predictable newsvendors. Management Science 59 (8): 1800–1816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Benaroch, M., Q. Dai, and R.J. Kauffman. 2010. Should we go our own way? Backsourcing flexibility in IT services contracts. Journal of Management Information Systems 26 (4): 317–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bohlmann, J.D., P.N. Golder, and D. Mitra. 2002. Deconstructing the pioneer’s advantage: Examining vintage effects and consumer valuations of quality and variety. Management Science 48 (9): 1175–1195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cachon, G.P., and P. Feldman. 2011. Pricing services subject to congestion: Charge per-use fees or sell subscriptions? Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 13 (2): 244–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cachon, G.P., and F. Zhang. 2006. Procuring fast delivery: Sole sourcing with information asymmetry. Management Science 52 (6): 881–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cachon, G.P., and F. Zhang. 2007. Obtaining fast service in a queueing system via performance-based allocation of demand. Management Science 53 (3): 408–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cachon, G.P., and A.G. Kok. 2007. Implementation of the newsvendor model with clearance pricing: How to (and how not to) estimate a salvage value. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 9 (3): 276–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cearley, D.W. 2011. Case studies in cloud computing, Gartner. https://www.gartner.com/doc/1761616/case-studies-cloud-computing
  17. Chod, J., and N. Rudi. 2005. Resource flexibility with responsive pricing. Operations Research 53 (3): 532–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cisco. 2014. Private cloud computing for enterprises: Meet the demands of high utilization and rapid change. Cisco White Paper. http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/data-center-virtualization/cloud-computing/white_paper_c11-543729.
  19. Cisco. 2016. Cloud computing in higher education: A guide to evaluation and adoption. CISCO White paper. https://www.cisco.com/web/offer/email/43468/5/Cloud_Computing_in_Higher_Education.pdf
  20. Clemons, E.K. 1991. Evaluation of strategic investments in information technology. Communications of the ACM 34 (1): 22–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Clemons, E.K., and M.C. Row. 1991. Sustaining IT advantage: The role of structural differences. MIS Quarterly 15 (3): 275–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Colombo, L., and P. Labrecciosa. 2012. A note on pricing with risk aversion. European Journal of Operational Research 216 (1): 252–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dewan, S., and H. Mendelson. 1990. User delay costs and internal pricing for a service facility. Management Science 36 (12): 1502–1517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dewan, R., B. Jing, and A. Seidmann. 2003. Product customization and price competition on the Internet. Management Science 49 (8): 1055–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dey, D., A. Lahiri, and G. Zhang. 2014. Quality competition and market segmentation in the security software market. MIS Quarterly 38 (2): 589–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dey, D., A. Lahiri, and D. Liu. 2013. Consumer learning and time-locked trials of software products. Journal of Management Information Systems 30 (2): 239–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dey, D., and A. Lahiri. 2016. Versioning: Go vertical in a horizontal market? Journal of Management Information Systems 33 (2): 546–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Erber, M. 2016. What is hybrid cloud? IBM Blogs. https://www.ibm.com/blogs/cloud-computing/2014/01/what-is-hybrid-cloud/
  29. Elmaghraby, W.J. 2000. Supply contract competition and sourcing policies. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 2 (4): 350–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fu, Q., C.Y. Lee, and C.P. Teo. 2010. Procurement management using option contracts: Random spot price and the portfolio effect. IIE Transactions 42 (11): 793–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gauger, A. 2013. Amazon’s ‘mountain of margin’ in cloud services: over 80% profit. Venture Beat. https://venturebeat.com/2013/09/05/amazons-mountain-of-margin-in-cloud-services-over-80-profit/
  32. Gaudin, S. 2016. Global public cloud market expected to hit $204B in 2016. Computer World. http://www.computerworld.com/article/3026396/cloud-computing/global-public-cloud-market-expected-to-hit-204b-in-2016.html
  33. Gaudin, S. 2014. Enterprises increasingly look to the private cloud. Computer World. http://www.computerworld.com/article/2490138/private-cloud/enterprises-increasingly-look-to-the-private-cloud.html
  34. Greene, T. 2011. Squeeze WAN providers now for a better cloud later. Network World. http://www.networkworld.com/article/2184092/cloud-computing/squeeze-wan-providers-now-for-a-better-cloud-later.html
  35. Harms, R., and M. Yamartino. 2010. The economics of the cloud. Microsoft whitepaper, Microsoft Corporation.Google Scholar
  36. IBM. 2013. The US Open is keeping fans immersed in the match with IBM Cloud. https://www.ibm.com/, http://www.ibm.com/smarterplanet/us/en/madewithibm/stories/#!story/39?ref=home.
  37. Inderfurth, K., and P. Kelle. 2011. Capacity reservation under spot market price uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics 133 (1): 272–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Intel. 2016. Public cloud vs. private cloud vs. hybrid cloud. Intel.in Video Compilation. http://www.intel.in/content/www/in/en/cloud-computing/cloud-101-video.html
  39. Jackson, K.L. 2011. The economic benefit of cloud computing. Forbes. http://www.forbes.com/sites/kevinjackson/2011/09/17/the-economic-benefit-of-cloud-computing/#2f28a3d25bf1
  40. Jain, T., and J. Hazra. 2016. Sourcing under incomplete information and negative capacity-cost correlation. Journal of the Operational Research Society 67 (3): 437–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jain, T., and J. Hazra. 2017. Dual sourcing under suppliers’ capacity investments. International Journal of Production Economics 183: 103–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jiang, B., P.Y. Chen, and T. Mukhopadhyay. 2007. Software licensing: Pay-per-use versus perpetual. Available at SSRN 1088570.Google Scholar
  43. Kazaz, B., and S. Webster. 2011. The impact of yield-dependent trading costs on pricing and production planning under supply uncertainty. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 13 (3): 404–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kanda, A., and S.G. Deshmukh. 2008. Supply chain coordination: Perspectives, empirical studies and research directions. International Journal of Production Economics 115 (2): 316–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kepes, B. 2016. Understanding the cloud computing stack: SaaS, PaaS, IaaS. Rackspace.com White Paper. https://support.rackspace.com/white-paper/understanding-the-cloud-computing-stack-saas-paas-iaas/
  46. Kepes, B. 2014. A good hybrid cloud case study–asheville shows how hybrid should be done. Forbes. http://www.forbes.com/sites/benkepes/2014/11/26/a-good-hybrid-cloud-case-study-asheville-shows-how-hybrid-should-be-done/#196307707336
  47. Lahiri, A., and D. Dey. 2013. Effects of piracy on quality of information goods. Management Science 59 (1): 245–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lariviere, M.A., and E.L. Porteus. 2001. Selling to the newsvendor: An analysis of price-only contracts. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 3 (4): 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Long, X., and J. Nasiry. 2014. Prospect theory explains newsvendor behavior: The role of reference points. Management Science 61 (12): 3009–3012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Li, C., and L.G. Debo. 2009. Strategic dynamic sourcing from competing suppliers with transferable capacity investment. Naval Research Logistics 56 (6): 540–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Loh, L. 1994. An organizational-economic blueprint for information technology outsourcing: Concepts and evidence. In The Fifteenth International Conference on Information Systems, ed. J.I. DeGross, S.L. Huff, and M.C. Munro, , 73–89, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  52. Loh, L., and N. Venkatraman. 1995. An empirical study of information technology outsourcing: Benefits, risks, and performance implications. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Information Systems, 277–288, December 10–13, 1995, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  53. Ma, D., and A. Seidmann. 2015. Analyzing software as a service with per-transaction charges. Information Systems Research 26 (2): 360–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mahadevan, B., J. Hazra, and T. Jain. 2017. Services outsourcing under asymmetric cost information. European Journal of Operational Research 257 (2): 456–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mandal, P., R. Kaul, and T. Jain. 2017. Stocking and pricing decisions under endogenous demand and reference point effects. European Journal of Operational Research 264 (1): 181–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Marcon, M., N. Santos, K.P. Gummadi, N. Laoutaris, P. Rodriguez, and A. Vahdat. 2010. Netex: Efficient and cost-effective Internet bulk content delivery. In 2010 ACM/IEEE Symposium on Architectures for Networking and Communications Systems (ANCS), pp 1–2. IEEE.Google Scholar
  57. MaratheR, R., and S.M. Ryan. 2009. Capacity expansion under a service-level constraint for uncertain demand with lead times. Naval Research Logistics (NRL) 56 (3): 250–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Martínez-de-Albéniz, V., and D. Simchi-Levi. 2009. Competition in the supply option market. Operations Research 57 (5): 1082–1097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Minner, S. 2003. Multiple-supplier inventory models in supply chain management: A review. International Journal of Production Economics 81: 265–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mendelson, H., and T.I. Tunca. 2007. Strategic spot trading in supply chains. Management Science 53 (5): 742–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mendelson, H. 1985. Pricing computer services: Queueing effects. Communications of the ACM 28 (3): 312–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mor, Y. 2015. Analyzing AWS price drops over the past 5 years. www.cloudyn.com, https://www.cloudyn.com/blog/analyzing-aws-ec2-price-drops-over-the-past-5-years/
  63. Olavsrud, T., 2015. Top cloud Infrastructure-as-a-Service vendors. CIO. http://www.cio.com/article/2947282/cloud-infrastructure/top-cloud-infrastructure-as-a-service-vendors.html
  64. Pei, P.P.E., D. Simchi-Levi, and T.I. Tunca. 2011. Sourcing flexibility, spot trading, and procurement contract structure. Operations Research 59 (3): 578–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Petruzzi, N.C., and M. Dada. 2010. Newsvendor models. Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science.Google Scholar
  66. Prasad, A., K.E. Stecke, and X. Zhao. 2011. Advance selling by a newsvendor retailer. Production and Operations Management 20 (1): 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Richmond, W.B., and A. Seidmann. 1993. Software development outsourcing contract: Structure and business value. Journal of Management Information Systems 10 (1): 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Salesforce.com. 2015. Why move to the cloud? 10 benefits of cloud computing. Salesforce.com Blogs. https://www.salesforce.com/uk/blog/2015/11/why-move-to-the-cloud-10-benefits-of-cloud-computing.html
  69. Seifert, R.W., U.W. Thonemann, and W.H. Hausman. 2004. Optimal procurement strategies for online spot markets. European Journal of Operational Research 152 (3): 781–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Serel, D.A., M. Dada, and H. Moskowitz. 2001. Sourcing decisions with capacity reservation contracts. European Journal of Operation Research 31: 635–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Serel, D.A. 2008. Inventory and pricing decisions in a single-period problem involving risky supply. International Journal of Production Economics 116 (1): 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Stuart, A. 2016a. How SMEs are benefitting from hybrid cloud architecture in the best of both worlds. Business Cloud News. http://www.businesscloudnews.com/2016/05/10/how-smes-are-benefitting-from-hybrid-cloud-architecture-in-the-best-of-both-worlds/
  73. Stuart, A. 2016b. A hybrid cloud architecture works best for SMEs. ComparetheCloud.net. https://www.comparethecloud.net/articles/a-hybrid-cloud-architecture-works-best-for-smes/
  74. Sundararajan, A. 2004. Nonlinear pricing of information goods. Management Science 50 (12): 1660–1673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Tang, C.S., and R. Yin. 2007. Responsive pricing under supply uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research 182 (1): 239–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Topkis, D.M. 1979. Equilibrium points in nonzero-sum-person submodular games. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization 17 (6): 773–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Van Mieghem, J.A., and M. Dada. 1999. Price versus production postponement: Capacity and competition. Management Science 45 (12): 1639–1649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Varian, H. 2000. Buying, selling and renting information goods. Journal of Industrial Economics 48 (4): 473–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wang, E.T., T. Barron, and A. Seidmann. 1997. Contracting structures for custom software development: The impacts of informational rents and uncertainty on internal development and outsourcing. Management Science 43 (12): 1726–1744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Whitten, D., and D. Leidner. 2006. Bringing IT back: An analysis of the decision to backsource or switch vendors. Decision Sciences 37 (4): 605–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Weinman, J. 2009. Hedging your options for the cloud. Gigaom. https://gigaom.com/2009/12/13/hedging-your-options-for-the-cloud/
  82. Wang, C.X., and S. Webster. 2007. Channel coordination for a supply chain with a risk neutral manufacturer and a loss-averse retailer. Decision Sciences 38 (3): 361–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wu, D.J., and P.R. Kleindorfer. 2005. Competitive options, supply contracting, and electronic markets. Management Science 51 (3): 452–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Xu, Y., and A. Bisi. 2012. Wholesale-price contracts with postponed and fixed retail prices. Operations Research Letters 40 (4): 250–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zhang, J., and A. Seidmann. 2010. Perpetual versus subscription licensing under quality uncertainty and network externality effects. Journal of Management Information Systems 27 (1): 39–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of Management UdaipurUdaipurIndia
  2. 2.Indian Institute of Management BangaloreBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations