Skip to main content

Optimizing the health benefits of climate change policies using health impact assessment

Journal of Public Health Policy volume 41, pages 139–154 (2020)Cite this article

Abstract

Health impact assessment (HIA) is a tool that can be used to examine the potential health impacts of proposed climate change policies and offer recommendations to promote health and mitigate adverse health consequences of such policies. We used an HIA database, a literature search, and expert consultation to identify 12 HIAs of the proposed climate change policies from six states in the U.S. These policies included cap-and-trade legislation, heat-wave and sea-level-rise mitigation and adaptation, transportation policy impacts of climate change, carbon-reduction strategy scenarios, soil- and water-conservation strategies, urban forest canopy for climate adaptation, overheating buildings, and regional transportation plan and sustainable communities strategies. In four descriptive summaries, we found that HIAs foster stakeholder engagement and provide useful health-promoting recommendations. HIAs can facilitate cross-sector collaboration, help optimize the health co-benefits of climate change policies, and raise awareness among decision makers of health impacts of those proposed policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. U.S. Global Change Research Program. The impacts of climate change on human health in the United States: A scientific assessment. Washington, DC: U.S. Global Change Research Program. 2016. https://doi.org/10.7930/j0r49nqx. Accessed 6 July 2019.

  2. National Research Council, Committee on Health Impact Assessment. Improving health in the United States: The role of health impact assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13229/improving-health-in-the-united-states-the-role-of-health. Accessed 6 July 2019.

  3. Bhatia R, Wernham A. Integrating human health into environmental impact assessment: an unrealized opportunity for environmental health and justice. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116(8):991–1000. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.11132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Turner LR, Alderman K, Connell D, Tong S. Motivators and barriers to incorporating climate change-related health risks in environmental health impact assessment. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;10(3):1139–51. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10031139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ricklin A, Madeley M, Whitton E, Carey A. The state of health impact assessment in planning. American Planning Association. 2016. https://planning-org-uploaded-media.s3.amazonaws.com/document/State-of-Health-Impact-Assessment-in-Planning.pdf. Accessed 6 July 2019.

  6. Dannenberg AL, Ricklin A, Ross CL, Schwartz M, West J, White S, Wier ML. Use of health impact assessment for transportation planning:importance of transportation agency involvement in the process. Transp Res Rec. 2014;2452:71–80. https://doi.org/10.3141/2452-09.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Waheed F, Ferguson GM, Ollson CA, MacLellan JI, McCallum LC, Cole DC. Health impact assessment of transportation projects, plans and policies: a scoping review. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2018;71:17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2017.12.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gase LN, DeFosset AR, Gakh M, Harris C, Weisman SR, Dannenberg AL. Review of education-focused health impact assessments conducted in the United States. J School Health. 2017;87(12):911–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hom E, Dannenberg AL, Farquhar S, Thornhill L. A systematic review of health impact assessments in the criminal justice system. Am J Crim Justice. 2017;42(4):883–908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-017-9391-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. National Center for Healthy Housing. A systematic review of health impact assessments on housing decisions and guidance for future practice. Columbia, MD: National Center for Healthy Housing; 2016. http://www.nchh.org/Portals/0/Contents/Guidance-for-Conducting-HIAs-on-Housing-Decisions.pdf. Accessed 6 July 2019.

  11. Cowling K, Lindberg R, Dannenberg AL, Neff RA, Pollack K. Review of health impact assessments informing agriculture, food, and nutrition policies, programs, and projects in the United States. J Agric Food Syst Community Devel. 2017;7(3):139–57. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2017.073.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nkyekyer EW, Dannenberg AL. Use and effectiveness of health impact assessment in the energy and natural resources sector in the United States, 2007–2016. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 2018;37:17–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2018.1519221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Health Impact Project. HIAs and other resources to advance health-informed decisions. Toolkit. Washington, DC: The Pew Charitable Trusts; 2019. www.pewtrusts.org/healthimpactproject/toolkit. Accessed 30 Aug 2019.

  14. Morley R, Lindberg R, Rogerson B, Bever E, Pollack KM. Seven years in the field of health impact assessment: taking stock and future directions. Chron of Health Impact Assess. 1(1), 2016. https://journals.iupui.edu/index.php/chia/article/view/21352.

  15. Schuchter J, Bhatia R, Corburn J, Seto E. Health impact assessment in the United States: has practice followed standards? Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2014;47:47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2014.03.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bourcier E, Charbonneau D, Cahill C, Dannenberg AL. An evaluation of health impact assessments in the United States, 2011–2014. Prev Chronic Dis. 2015;12:140376. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd12.140376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sohn EK, Stein LJ, Wolpoff A, Lindberg R, Baum A, McInnis-Simoncelli A, Pollack KM. Avenues of influence: the relationship between health impact assessment and determinants of health and health equity. J Urban Health. 2018;95(5):754–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-018-0263-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Walker E, Payne D. Health impact assessment of coal and clean energy options in Kentucky. Kentucky Environmental Foundation; 2012. https://www.pewtrusts.org/-/media/assets/2012/04/03/payne_hia_coal_renewable_energy_kentucky.pdf?la=en&hash=36902D80E959A35B83B7652F23CD4B23D9F04ABF. Accessed 6 July 2019.

  19. Nelson DI. Health impact assessment of climate change in Bangladesh. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2003;23(3):323–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00102-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Brown HL, Proust K, Spickett J, Capon A. The potential role of health impact assessment in tackling the complexity of climate change adaptation for health. Health Promot J Aust. 2011;22(Spec No. 4):S48–53. https://doi.org/10.1071/he11448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Patz J, Campbell-Lendrum D, Gibbs H, Woodruff R. Health impact assessment of global climate change: expanding on comparative risk assessment approaches for policy making. Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;2008(29):27–39. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kirshen P, Aytur S, Burdick D, Foster D, Lippmann T. Integrated analysis of the value of wetland services in coastal adaptation; methodology and case study of Hampton-Seabrook Estuary, New Hampshire. Final Report NOAA Award Number NA14OAR4310194. 2019. https://unh.app.box.com/s/u4d8c2l1sbyevcz8teboni4g5nvbfug4/file/410476956338. Accessed 6 July 2019.

  23. Oregon Health Authority. Health impact assessment. Climate HIAs. 2014. https://www.oregon.gov/oha/PH/HEALTHYENVIRONMENTS/TRACKINGASSESSMENT/HEALTHIMPACTASSESSMENT/Pages/CSCHIA.aspx. Accessed 6 July 2019.

  24. Richardson MJ, English P, Rudolph L. A health impact assessment of California’s proposed cap-and-trade regulations. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(9):e52–8. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Whitfield GP, Meehan LA, Maizlish N, Wendel AM. The Integrated transport and health impact modeling tool in Nashville, Tennessee, USA: implementation steps and lessons learned. J Transp Health. 2017;5:172–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2016.06.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Region Nine Development Commission. South Central Minnesota climate change vulnerability assessment and adaptation plan health impact assessment. 2016. https://www.rndc.org/download/community_economic_development/health-impact-assesment-region-nine.pdf. Accessed 6 July 2019.

  27. Krohn T. Local study aims to adapt to climate change. Mankato Free Press, online edition, 8 July 2017. http://www.mankatofreepress.com/news/local-study-aims-to-adapt-to-climate-change/article_caf71d3a-6335-11e7-bba1-6fe67154d13e.html. Accessed 6 July 2019.

  28. Steck J. Region Nine Development Commission receives innovation award. Mankato Times, online edition, 28 September 2017. http://mankatotimes.com/2017/09/28/region-nine-development-commission-receives-innovation-award/ Accessed 6 July 2019.

  29. Pioneer Valley Planning Commission. Assessing the health impacts and benefits of regional climate action plan strategies in western Massachusetts. 2016. http://www.pvpc.org/content/assessing-health-impacts-and-benefits-regional-climate-action-plan-strategies-western. Accessed 6 July 2019.

  30. Hawkins P, editor. Drawdown: the most comprehensive plan ever proposed to reverse global warming. New York: Penguin Books; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Younger M, Morrow-Almeida HR, Vindigni SM, Dannenberg AL. The built environment, climate change, and health: opportunities for co-benefits. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(5):517–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.08.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Dannenberg AL. Effectiveness of health impact assessments: a synthesis of data from five impact evaluation reports. Prev Chronic Dis. 2016;13:150559. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd13.150559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Center for Community Health and Evaluation and Human Impact Partners. Community participation in health impact assessments: a national evaluation. Seattle, WA: Center for Community Health and Evaluation and Human Impact Partners. 2015. https://humanimpact.org/hipprojects/community-participation-in-health-impact-assessments-a-national-evaluation/. Accessed 6 July 2019.

  34. Air Resources Board, State of California. 2017 Climate change scoping plan update. Resolution 17-46. 2017. https://www.arb.ca.gov/board/res/2017/res17-46.pdf. Accessed 6 July 2019.

  35. London Health Commission and the Environment Committee of the Assembly. Health Impact Assessment – Draft Energy Strategy. 2002. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20170106084757/http://www.apho.org.uk/resource/item.aspx?RID=44159. Accessed 6 July 2019.

  36. Thondoo M, Rojas-Rueda D, Gupta J, de Vries DH, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ. Systematic literature review of health impact assessments in low and middle-income countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(11). https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/11/2018.

  37. Diallo T, Cantoreggi N, Simos J, Christie DPTH. Is HIA the most effective tool to assess the impact on health of climate change mitigation policies at the local level? A case study in Geneva, Switzerland. Glob Health Promot. 2017;24(2):5–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757975916686920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Health Impact Project, a collaboration of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and The Pew Charitable Trusts. The authors thank Ashley Aukes, Andrea Hamberg, Ruth Lindberg, Kristen Raab, Catherine Ratte, Margaret Round, Julie Sifuentes, and Sandra Whitehead for their assistance in providing additional information about specific HIAs reviewed in this report. In addition, the authors thank Abigail Baum and Stefanie Carignan for their effort to verify information in Table 1.

Disclaimer

The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Pew Charitable Trusts or the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Washington, 3940 NE Surber Drive, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA

    Andrew L. Dannenberg

  2. Health Impact Project, Pew Charitable Trusts, Washington, DC, USA

    Bethany Rogerson

  3. Center for Climate Change and Health, Public Health Institute, Oakland, CA, USA

    Linda Rudolph

Authors
  1. Andrew L. Dannenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bethany Rogerson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Linda Rudolph
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew L. Dannenberg.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dannenberg, A.L., Rogerson, B. & Rudolph, L. Optimizing the health benefits of climate change policies using health impact assessment. J Public Health Pol 41, 139–154 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-019-00189-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-019-00189-y

Keywords

  • Climate change
  • Policy
  • Health impact assessment
  • Co-benefits