Skip to main content
Log in

Central European subalterns speak security (too): Towards a truly post-Western feminist security studies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of International Relations and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) has long been epistemically marginalized in many academic disciplines, including the Western-centric Feminist Security Studies (FSS). While there is growing FSS literature from/on locations beyond the ‘Global North,’ scholarship from/on CEE is relatively absent in these conversations. When CEE is discussed, it is limited to critique of a region plagued with racism, illiberalism, populism or anti-genderism. While these all present very pressing and persistent problems, more nuanced understanding of the region is needed. This has become urgent since the February 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine which has sparked an ‘Eastern turn’ among Western FSS scholars. But this sudden interest, we argue, has collided with long-lacking intellectual foundation, solidarity and understanding of the region, often resulting in troubling ‘Westsplaining.’ Using postcolonial and decolonial framing that reflects on the collective trauma of the continuum of Russian imperialist violence, we discuss the complexity of CEE’s gendered politics amid the latest Russian aggression. We analyse colonial projections in the Western feminist responses to the invasion and reflect on our own awkward encounters. We call for more constructive, inclusive, and decolonial East/West transnational feminists encounters which are urgently needed now amidst the gendered war but also long-term for confronting global anti-feminist forces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We wish to speak in this paper mainly to the Western FSS field, but we acknowledge that speaking over CEE and Ukraine specifically has also come from some in the Global South.

  2. This term has been introduced by CEE scholars in response to the Western tendencies to speak over Ukraine and CEE (see Smoleński and Dutkiewicz 2022; Sonevytsky 2022).

  3. We use the term ‘Global East’ to denote peripheralized scholarship from and about countries in-between Global North and South. It should be further noted, however, that Global East is not a homogenous epistemic entity and its equalization with Russian Studies in Western academia is highly problematic as it erases other CEE countries historically subjugated by Russian imperialism from the mental maps of the West (Khromeychuk 2022b).

  4. For further discussion on the absence of Ukraine in West’s mental map and ‘knowledge as security’, see Khromeychuk (2022b).

  5. There are different ways of knowledge extraction from simply using direct CEE knowledge without citing it to conducting field research in CEE via Western concepts for Western academia which holds the epistemic authority.

  6. Specifically telling is the programe of the West-dominated International Studies Association (ISA) conference in Montreal 2023 which includes the word Ukraine 135 times, Ukrainian 11 times and Russia 159 times. In contrast, the 2022 Nashville ISA conference programme included Russia 128 times and Ukraine only 15 times.

  7. See the full issue of Gender Studies, Vol. 26 (1/2022): Kharkiv Center for Gender Studies on Transnational Feminist Solidarity with Ukrainian Feminists Following the On-line Meeting on May 9, 2022.

References

  • Ackerly, Brooke A., Maria Stern, and Jacqui True, eds. (2006) Feminist methodologies for international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, Sara. (2017) Living a Feminist Life, Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azarov, Denys, Dmytro Koval, Gaiane Nuridzhanian and Volodymyr Venher (2023). Understanding Russia’s Actions in Ukraine as the Crime of Genocide. Journal of International Criminal Justice.

  • Balogun, Bolaji (2022) ‘Eastern Europe: The ‘other’geographies in the colonial global economy,’ Area 54 (3): 460–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthwal-Datta, Monika. (2023) ‘On In/Visibility’, Journal of Critical Southern Studies 4 (3): 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, Soumita. (2013) ‘Emancipatory potential in feminist security studies’, International Studies Perspectives 14 (4): 455–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blagojevic, Marina. (2004) ‘Creators, Transmitters, and Users: Women's Scientific Excellence at the Semiperiphery of Europe’, European Education 36 (4): 70–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaney, David L., and Arlene B. Tickner (2017) Worlding, ontological politics and the possibility of a decolonial IR’, Millennium 45 (3): 293–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brigg, Morgan, and Roland Bleiker. (2010) ‘Autoethnographic international relations: Exploring the self as a source of knowledge’, Review of international studies 36 (3): 779–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Causevic, Az, Kavita Philip, Maari Zwick-Maitreyi, Persephone Hooper Lewis, Siko Bouterse, and Anasuya Sengupta, (2020) ‘Centering knowledge from the margins: our embodied practices of epistemic resistance and revolution’, International Feminist Journal of Politics 22 (1): 6–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Ulrika. (2021) ‘Nordic academic feminism and whiteness as epistemic habit’, in Suvi Keskinen, Pauline Stoltz and Diana Mulinari eds. Feminisms in the Nordic Region: Neoliberalism, Nationalism and Decolonial Critique, 113–33, Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dauphinee, Elizabeth. (2010) ‘The ethics of autoethnography’, Review of international studies 36 (3): 799–818.

    Google Scholar 

  • E-International Relations. (2023) ‘Interview - Paul Kirby’, 20 June, available at: https://www.e-ir.info/2023/06/20/interview-paul-kirby/

  • Dudko, Oksana. (2022) ‘A conceptual limbo of genocide: Russian rhetoric, mass atrocities in Ukraine, and the current definition’s limits,’ Canadian Slavonic Papers 64 (2-3): 133–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duriesmith, David. (2020) ‘Friends don't let friends cite the malestream: a case for strategic silence in feminist international relations." International Feminist Journal of Politics 22 (1): 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettorre, Elizabeth. (2016) Autoethnography as feminist method: Sensitising the feminist 'I'. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Euronews. (2023) ‘'Ukraine refugee porn' raises risks for women fleeing the war’, 17 January, available at https://www.euronews.com/2023/01/17/ukraine-refugee-porn-raises-risks-for-women-fleeing-the-war

  • Graff, Agnieszka. (2022) ‘Solidarity with Ukraine, or: why East-West still Matters to Feminism’, Gender Studies 26 (1): 57–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guasti, Petra, and Lenka Bustikova. (2023) ‘Varieties of Illiberal Backlash in Central Europe’, Problems of Post-Communism 70 (2): 1-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haastrup, Toni and Jamie J. Hagen. (2021) ‘Racial hierarchies of knowledge production in the Women, Peace and Security agenda’, Critical Studies on Security 9 (1): 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, Jamie J., Ilaria Michelis, Jennifer Philippa Eggert, and Lewis Turner. (2023) ‘Learning to say ‘no’: privilege, entitlement and refusal in peace,(post) conflict and security research’, Critical Studies on Security: 1–19.

  • Hall, Lucy B., Anna L. Weissman, and Laura J. Shepherd, eds. 2019. Troubling motherhood: maternality in global politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendl, Tereza. (2022) ‘Towards Accounting for Russian Imperialism and Building Meaningful Transnational Feminist Solidarity with Ukraine’, Gender Studies 26 (1): 62–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, Marsha (2013). Ten Reasons Not To Write Your Master’s Dissertation on Sexual Violence in War. The Disorder of Things, 4 June, available at: https://thedisorderofthings.com/2013/06/04/ten-reasons-not-to-write-your-masters-dissertation-on-sexual-violencein-war/

  • Henry, Marsha. (2022) ‘On the necessity of critical race feminism for women, peace and security’, Critical Studies on Security 9 (1): 22–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoijtink, Marijn, Mühlenhoff, Hanna L., Natalie Welfens, Natalie. Whose (In)Security? Gender, Race and Coloniality in European Security Policies. Introduction to the Special Issue. European Security (forthcoming)

  • Hozić, Aida, A. and Juliana Restrepo Sanín. (2022) ‘Reimagining the aftermath of war, now’, LSE blog, available at https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/wps/2022/05/10/reimagining-the-aftermath-of-war-now/

  • Institute of International Relations. (2022) ‘Ukrainian Feminists’ Responses To the Russian Invasion’, 4 May, available at: https://www.iir.cz/en/ukrainian-feminists-responses-to-the-russian-invasion-1

  • Kalmar, Ivan. (2022) White but not quite: Central Europe’s illiberal revolt. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khromeychuk, Olesya. (2022a) ‘Why the West underestimated Ukraine’, New Statesman. 20 December, available at: https://www.newstatesman.com/world/europe/ukraine/2022a/12/the-west-underestimated-ukraine-war

  • Khromeychuk, Olesya. (2022b) ‘Where is Ukraine?’, Royal Society of Arts 2, available at https://www.thersa.org/comment/2022b/06/where-is-ukraine

  • Koobak, Redi, Madina Tlostanova, and Suruchi Thapar-Björkert, eds. (2021) Postcolonial and postsocialist dialogues: intersections, opacities, challenges in feminist theorizing and practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krulišová, Kateřina, and Míla O’Sullivan. 2022 ‘Feminist security studies in Europe: beyond Western academics’ club’, in Stern, Maria, and Ann E. Towns, Feminist IR in Europe: Knowledge Production in Academic Institutions, 33–53. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022.

  • Kulawik, Teresa (2020) ‘Introduction: European borderlands and topographies of transnational feminism’, in: Teresa Kulawik and Zhanna Kravchenko, eds, Borderlands in European gender studies: beyond the East-West frontier, 1–38, Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulawik, Teresa and Zhanna Kravchenko eds. (2020) Borderlands in European Gender Studies. Beyond the East-West Frontier, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, Aleksandra. (2022) ‘East–west inequalities and the ambiguous racialisation of ‘Eastern Europeans’’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies: 1–19.

  • Lovec, Marko, Kateřina Kočí, and Zlatko Šabič. (2021) ‘The stigmatisation of Central Europe via (failed) socialisation narrative’, Journal of International Relations and Development 24 (2021): 890–909.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyubchenko, Olena. (2022) ‘On the Frontier of Whiteness? Expropriation, War, and Social Reproduction in Ukraine’, Left East, 30 April, available at: https://lefteast.org/frontiers-of-whiteness-expropriation-war-social-reproduction-in-ukraine/

  • Mälksoo, Maria. (2021) ‘Uses of ‘the East’ in international studies: provincialising IR from Central and Eastern Europe’, Journal of International Relations and Development 24 (4): 811–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marling, Raili. (2021) ‘Opacity as a feminist strategy: Postcolonial and postsocialist entanglements with neoliberalism’, in Koobak, Redi, Madina Tlostanova, and Suruchi Thapar-Björkert, eds. Postcolonial and postsocialist dialogues: intersections, opacities, challenges in feminist theorizing and practice, 94–108. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin de Almagro, Maria and Caitlin Ryan. (2020) ‘Introduction: (Re)integrating Feminist Security Studies and Global Political Economy: Continuing the Conversation through Empirical Perspectives’, Politics & Gender 16 (3): 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medie, Peace A., and Alice J. Kang. (2018) ‘Power, knowledge and the politics of gender in the Global South’, European Journal of Politics and Gender 1 (1-2): 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyklová, Blanka, Kateřina Cidlinská, and Nina Fárová. (2019) ‘International relations in the Czech Republic: Where have all the women gone?’, Czech Journal of International Relations 54 (2): 5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Sullivan, Míla, and Kateřina Krulišová. (2023) ‘Women, Peace and Security in central Europe: in between the western agenda and Russian imperialism’, International Affairs 99 (2): 99: 625–43.

  • Parashar, Swati. (2013) ‘Feminist (in) securities and camp politics’, International Studies Perspectives 14 (4): 440–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parashar, Swati. (2020) ‘Old Narratives, New Methods: UNSCR 1325 and the WPS’, Frauen*solidarität (Women’s Solidarity), Austrian feminist magazine: 24–5.

  • Parvulescu, Anca. (2015) ‘European racial triangulation’, in Sandra Ponzanesi and Gianmaria Colpani, eds. Postcolonial Transitions in Europe, 25–46. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield International.

  • Phillips, Sara, D. and Tamara Martsenyuk. (2023) ‘Women’s agency and resistance in Russia’s war on Ukraine: From victim of the war to prominent force’, Women’s Studies International Forum 98: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roggeband, Conny, and Andrea Krizsán (2020) ‘Democratic backsliding and the backlash against women’s rights: Understanding the current challenges for feminist politics’, New York: UN Women.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safuta, Anna (2018) ‘Fifty shades of white: Eastern Europeans’ ‘peripheral whiteness’ in the context of domestic services provided by migrant women,’ Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies 21 (3): 217–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, Laura J. (2014) ‘The State of Feminist Security Studies: Continuing the Conversation’, International Studies Perspectives 14 (4): 436–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, Laura J. 2020 ‘Situating Women, Peace and Security: theorizing from “the local”’, International Feminist Journal of Politics 22 (4): 456–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smoleński, Jan and Jan Dutkiewicz. (2022) ‘The American Pundits Who Can’t Resist “Westsplaining” Ukraine’, New Republic, 4 March, available at: https://newrepublic.com/article/165603/carlson-russia-ukraine-imperialism-nato

  • Sondarjee, Maïka. (2022) ‘We Are a Community of Practice, Not a Paradigm! How to Meaningfully Integrate Gender and Feminist Approaches in IR Syllabi’, International Studies Perspectives 23 (3): 229–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonevytsky, Maria. 2022. What Is Ukraine? Notes On Epistemic Imperialism. Topos, (2), 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavrevska, Elena B., Sladjana Lazic, Vjosa Musliu, Dženeta Karabegović, Julija Sardelić, and Jelena Obradovic-Wochnik. (2023) ‘Of Love and Frustration as Post-Yugoslav Women Scholars: Learning and Unlearning the Coloniality of IR in the Context of Global North Academia’, International Political Sociology 17 (2).

  • Stern, Maria, and Ann E. Towns. 2022. Feminist IR in Europe: Knowledge Production in Academic Institutions. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchland, Jennifer. (2011) ‘Is postsocialism transnational?’ Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 36 (4): 837–62.

  • Sylvester, Christine. (2010) "Tensions in feminist security studies." Security Dialogue 41 (6): 607–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Feminist Initiative Group. (2022) ‘”The right to resist.” A feminist manifesto’, Commons, 7 July, available at: https://commons.com.ua/en/right-resist-feminist-manifesto/

  • Tlostanova, Madina (2012) ‘Postsocialist≠ postcolonial? On post-Soviet imaginary and global coloniality’, Journal of postcolonial writing 48 (2): 130–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tlostanova, Madina, Suruchi Thapar-Björkert, and Redi Koobak. (2019) ‘The postsocialist ‘missing other’ of transnational feminism?’, Feminist Review 121(1): 81–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsymbalyuk, Darya and Iryna Zamuruieva. (2022) ‘Why we as feminists must lobby for air defence for Ukraine’, OpenDemocracy, 16 March, available at: https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/odr/ukraine-russia-war-feminists-we-must-lobby-for-air-defence/

  • Tsymbalyuk, Darya. 2022. Academia must recentre embodied and uncomfortable knowledge. Nature Human Behaviour, 6.

  • Ukraine Peace Appeal. (2023). Towards A More Informed Solidarity. https://www.ukrainepeaceappeal2023.info/

Download references

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive and kind advice, and the JIRD editors for their feedback and guidance throughout the review and production process. We are also very grateful for the many conversations we have had in the past year and a half with feminists from Ukraine, Central, Eastern, and Southeastern Europe, as well as from the 'West'.

Funding

This work was supported by British Academy Small Grant [SG2122\211293].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Míla O’Sullivan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

In this article, we build on previous FSS work that challenges FSS knowledge production including by taking inspiration for the title from Soumita Basu’s article ‘The global South writes 1325 (too)’, International Political Science Review 37: 3, 2016, pp. 362–74.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’Sullivan, M., Krulišová, K. Central European subalterns speak security (too): Towards a truly post-Western feminist security studies. J Int Relat Dev 26, 660–674 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-023-00302-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-023-00302-5

Keywords

Navigation