Skip to main content
Log in

[Our] age of anxiety: existentialism and the current state of international relations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of International Relations and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article is based on the keynote address I delivered in June 2019 at the Central and Eastern European International Studies Association (CEEISA) conference in Belgrade. Drawing on existentialist thought, I first discuss the distinction between anxiety and fear and the relevance of this distinction for international relations (IR) theory. Then, building on the Heideggerian notion of mood and its recent applications to IR by Erik Ringmar (2017, 2018), I argue that anxiety impacts international relations as a public mood—‘a collective way of being attuned to the world’. Connecting existentialist thought on anxiety with contemporary IR and political science research on securitisation and populism, I discuss how, in periods and contexts where we are collectively attuned to the world in anxiety, the resonance of securitisation and the appeal of nativist and populist doctrines that offer ideological and moral certainty are enhanced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Kustermans and Ringmar (2011) for a similar analysis of boredom.

References

  • Abulof, Ariel (2015) The Mortality and Morality of Nations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arato, Andrew (2013) ‘Political Theology and Populism’, Social Research 80(1): 143–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arfi, Badredine (2020) ‘Security qua existential surviving (while becoming otherwise) through performative leaps of faith’, International Theory 12(2): 291‒305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berenskoetter, Felix (2020) ‘Anxiety, time, and agency’, International Theory 12(2): 257‒72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, Christopher S. (2017) ‘“Je suis en terrasse”: Political Violence, Civilizational Politics, and the Everyday Courage to Be’, Political Psychology 39(2): 243–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunde, Tobias, Randolf Carr, Sophie Eisentraut, Christoph Erber, Julia Hammelehle, Laura Hartmann, Juliane Kabus, Franziska Stärk and Julian Voje (2020) Munich Security Report 2020 Munich Security Conference, https://securityconference.org/en/publications/munich-security-report-2020/.

  • Buzan, Barry, Wæver Ole and Jaap de Wilde (1998) Security: A New Framework for Analysis, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

  • Cash, John (2020) ‘Psychoanalysis, cultures of anarchy, and ontological insecurity’, International Theory 12(2): 306‒21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chernobrov, Dmitry (2019) Public Perception of International Crises: Identity, Ontological Security, and Self-Affirmation, London: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cote, Adam (2016) ‘Agents without agency: Assessing the role of the audience in securitization theory’, Security Dialogue 47(6): 541–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ejdus, Filip (2020) Crisis and Ontological Insecurity: Serbia’s Anxiety Over Kosovo’s Secession, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eklundh, Emmy, Emmanuel-Pierre Guittet and Andreja Zevnik (2017a) ‘Introduction: The Politics of Anxiety’, in Emmy Eklundh, Andreja Zevnik and Emmanuel-Pierre Guittet, eds, Politics of Anxiety, 1–13, London: Rowman & Littlefield.

  • Eklundh, Emmy, Andreja Zevnik and Emmanuel-Pierre Guittet, eds (2017b) Politics of Anxiety, London: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elpidorou, Andreas and Lauren Freeman (2015) ‘Affectivity in Heidegger I: Moods and Emotions in Being and Time’, Philosophy Compass 10(10): 661–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, Karl (2016) ‘Routinised Recognition and Anxiety: Understanding the Deterioration in Sino-Japanese Relations’, Review of International Studies 42(4): 613–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, Jeffrey (2015) Anxiety’s Ambiguity: Via Kierkegaard and Heidegger, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Essex.

  • Heath-Kelly, Charlotte (2016) Death and Security: Memory and Mortality at the Bombsite, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, Martin (1927/1996) Being and Time, translated by Joan Stambaugh, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

  • Herz, John (1962) International Politics in the Atomic Age, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hom, Andrew R. and Brent J. Steele (2020) ‘Anxiety, time, and ontological security’s third-image potential’, International Theory 12(2): 322‒36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, Allan V. (2013) Anxiety: A Short History, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huysmans, Jef (1998) ‘Security! What Do You Mean? From Concept to Thick Signifier’, European Journal of International Relations 4(2): 226–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kierkegaard, Søren (1844/1980) The Concept of Anxiety: A Simple Psychologically Orienting Deliberation on the Dogmatic Issue of Hereditary Sin, translated by Reidar Thomte, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Kinnvall, Catarina (2004) ‘Globalization and Religious Nationalism: Self, Identity, and the Search for Ontological Security’, Political Psychology 25(5): 741–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinnvall, Catarina (2019) ‘Populism, ontological insecurity and Hindutva: Modi and the masculinization of Indian politics’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32(3): 283–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinnvall, Catarina and Paul Nesbitt-Larking (2010) ‘The Political Psychology of (De)securitization: Place-Making Strategies in Denmark, Sweden, and Canada’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28(6): 1051–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinnvall, Catarina and Jennifer Mitzen (2020) ‘Anxiety, fear, and ontological security in world politics: thinking with and beyond Giddens’, International Theory 12(2): 240‒56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kustermans, Jorg and Erik Ringmar (2011) ‘Modernity, boredom, and war: a suggestive essay’, Review of International Studies 37(4): 1775–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marlow, Jim (2002) ‘Governmentality, ontological security and ideational stability: Preliminary observations on the manner, ritual and logic of a particular art of government’, Journal of Political Ideologies 7(2): 241–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitzen, Jennifer (2018) ‘Feeling at Home in Europe: Migration, Ontological Security, and the Political Psychology of EU Bordering’, Political Psychology 39(6): 1373–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neocleus, Mark (2012) ‘“Don’t Be Scared, Be Prepared”: Trauma-Anxiety-Resilience’, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 37(3): 188–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, Pippa and Ronald Inglehart (2019) Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, Jack (2014) Understanding Existentialism, London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ringmar, Erik (2017) ‘Outline of a Non-Deliberative, Mood-Based, Theory of Action’, Philosophia 45: 1527–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringmar, Erik (2018) ‘What Are Public Moods?’, European Journal of Social Theory 21(4): 453–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelili, Bahar (2020) ‘Integrating anxiety into international relations theory: Hobbes, existentialism, and ontological security’, International Theory 12(2): 257‒72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelili, Bahar (2015a) ‘Ontological (In)Security and Peace Anxieties: A Framework for Conflict Resolution’, in Bahar Rumelili, ed., Conflict Resolution and Ontological Security: Peace Anxieties, 10‒29, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelili, Bahar (2015b) ‘Identity and Desecuritization: The Pitfalls of Conflating Ontological and Physical Security’, Journal of International Relations and Development 18: 52–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelili, Bahar and Ayşe Betül Çelik (2017) ‘Ontological Insecurity in Asymmetric Conflicts: Reflections on Agonistic Peace in Turkey’s Kurdish Issue’, Security Dialogue 48(4): 279–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, Arthur M. Jr. (1948/1998) The Vital Center: The Politics of Freedom, New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.

  • Solomon, Ty (2015) The Politics of Subjectivity in American Foreign Policy, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, Ty (2018) ‘Ontological Security, Circulations of Affect, and the Arab Spring’, Journal of International Relations and Development 21: 934‒58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, Brent J. (2008) Ontological Security in International Relations: Self-Identity and the IR State, Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, Brent J. (2013) ‘The Politics and Limits of the Self: Kierkegaard, Neoconservatism and International Political Theory’, Journal of International Political Theory 9(2): 158–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, Brent J. and Alexandra Homolar (2019) ‘Ontological insecurities and the politics of contemporary populism’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32(3): 214–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stritzel, Holger (2007) ‘Towards a Theory of Securitization: Copenhagen and Beyond’, European Journal of International Relations 13(3): 357–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tillich, Paul (1952/2000) The Courage to Be, New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press.

  • Tucker, Robert C. (1968) ‘The Theory of Charismatic Leadership’, Daedalus 97(3): 731–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valéry, Paul. (1919/1962) ‘The Crisis of the Mind’, in Jackson Matthews, ed., Collected Works of Paul Valery, Volume 10: History and Politics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Van Rythonen, Erik (2015) ‘Learning to feel, learning to fear? Emotions, imaginaries, and limits in the politics of securitization’, Security Dialogue 46(5): 458–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wæver, Ole (1995) ‘Securitization and Desecuritization’, in Ronnie D. Lipschutz, ed., On Security, 46–86, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, Iain (2002) Anxiety in a ‘Risk’ Society, London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank the Program Chair of the 2019 CEEISA Conference, Jelena Subotic, for inviting me to deliver the keynote address. Additionally, I thank Jelena Subotic and Filip Ejdus for editing this Symposium on Anxiety, and Brent Steele, Andreja Zevnik, Karl Gustafsson, and Felix Berenskoetter for their generous and constructive engagement with my article. I also gratefully acknowledge the support of the previous and current editorial teams of the Journal of International Relations and Development as well as their thoughtful comments, which helped me improve the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bahar Rumelili.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rumelili, B. [Our] age of anxiety: existentialism and the current state of international relations. J Int Relat Dev 24, 1020–1036 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-021-00226-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-021-00226-y

Keywords

Navigation