Skip to main content
Log in

The role of foreign institutional investors in restraining earnings management activities across countries

  • Published:
Journal of International Business Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates the role of foreign institutional investors (FIIs) in restraining earnings management activities of firms under varying levels of investor protection. Firms manage their earnings less when independent FIIs are among their shareholders, especially for firms in which monitoring is more valuable – firms in weak investor protection countries and when firms have greater growth opportunities. These effects are robust to a quasi-exogenous shock to FIIs’ shareholdings, unobserved firm heterogeneity, and alternative earning management measures. FIIs are associated with an increase in foreign director presence on corporate boards and audit committees.

Résumé

Cette étude examine le rôle des investisseurs institutionnels étrangers (IIE) dans la limitation des activités de gestion des revenus des firmes présentant différents niveaux de protection des investisseurs. Les firmes gèrent moins leurs revenus lorsque les IIE sont parmi leurs actionnaires, en particulier les entreprises dans lesquelles la surveillance est plus utile - les entreprises situées dans des pays où la protection des investisseurs est faible et les opportunités de croissance accrues pour les entreprises. Ces effets sont robustes à un choc quasi-exogène sur les participations des IIE, à une hétérogénéité non observée des entreprises et à des mesures alternatives de gestion des revenus. Les IIE sont associés à une présence accrue d’administrateurs étrangers dans les conseils d’administration et les comités d’audit.

Resumen

Este estudio investiga el papel de los inversionistas institucionales extranjeros (FII por sus iniciales en inglés) en restringir las actividades de administración de ganancias de las empresas bajo distintos niveles de protección de los inversionistas. Las empresas gestionan menos sus ganancias cuando los inversionistas institucionales extranjeros independientes están entre sus accionistas, especialmente para las empresas en las que el monitoreo tiene más valor: las empresas en países con protección débil a los inversionistas y cuando las empresas tienen mayores oportunidades de crecimiento. Estos efectos son robustos a un choque casi exógeno para las participaciones de los inversionistas institucionales extranjeros, la heterogeneidad no observada de la empresa, y las medidas alternativas de gestión de ganancias. Los los inversionistas institucionales extranjeros están asociados con un aumento en la presencia de directores extranjeros en juntas directivas y comités de auditoría.

Resumo

Este estudo investiga o papel dos investidores institucionais estrangeiros (FIIs) em restringir as atividades de gestão de lucros das empresas sob diferentes níveis de proteção do investidor. As empresas gerenciam seus lucros menos quando FIIs independentes estão entre seus acionistas, especialmente em empresas nas quais o monitoramento é mais valioso - empresas em países com fraca proteção ao investidor e quando empresas têm maiores oportunidades de crescimento. Esses efeitos são robustos mesmo diante de um choque quase exógeno às participações acionárias dos FIIs, da heterogeneidade não observada da empresa, e a medidas alternativas de gerenciamento de lucros. FIIs estão associados a um aumento da presença de diretores estrangeiros em conselhos de administração e comitês de auditoria.

摘要

本研究调查了外国机构投资者(FIIs)在投资者保护不同水平下限制公司盈余管理活动中的作用。当独立的FIIs就在其股东中时, 公司较少管理它们的收益, 特别是对监管更有价值的公司 – 投资者保护薄弱国家的公司以及当公司有更大增长机会的时候。这些影响对于针对FIIs股权、未被观察到的公司异质性、以及替代收益管理措施的准外生冲击是强有力的。FIIs与外国董事在公司董事会和审计委员会中的存在增多有关。

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aggarwal, R., Erel, I., Ferreira, M., & Matos, P. 2011. Does governance travel around the world? Evidence from institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics, 100: 154–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguilera, R. V., Desender, K. A., López-Puertas, M., & Lee, J. H. 2017. The governance impact of a changing investor landscape: Foreign investors and managerial earnings forecasts. Journal of International Business Studies, 48: 195–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ammer, J., Holland, S., Smith, D., & Warnock, F. 2012. U.S. international equity investment. Journal of Accounting Research, 50: 1109–1139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayers, B., Ramalingegowda, S., & Yeung, E. 2011. Hometown advantage: The effects of monitoring institution location on financial reporting discretion. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 52: 41–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, R., Kothari, S. P., & Robin, A. 2000. The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29: 1–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becht, Marco, Franks, J., Mayer, C., & Rossi, S. 2009. Returns to shareholder activism: Evidence from a clinical study of the Hermes UK Focus Fund. Review of Financial Studies, 22: 3093–3129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, N., & Nicolaievsky, D. 2007. Investor protection and the coasian view. Journal of Financial Economics, 84: 738–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, U., Daouk, H., & Welker, M. 2003. The world price of earnings opacity. The Accounting Review, 78: 641–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickley, J., Lease, R., & Smith, C. 1988. Ownership structure and voting on antitakeover amendments. Journal of Financial Economics, 20: 267–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bushman, R., & Piotroski, J. 2006. Financial reporting incentives for conservative accounting: The influence of legal and political institutions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42: 107–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bushman, R., Piotroski, J., & Smith, A. 2003. What determines corporate transparency? Journal of Accounting Research, 42: 207–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bushman, R., & Smith, A. 2001. Financial accounting information and corporate governance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31: 237–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannizzaro, A., & Weiner, R. 2018. State ownership and transparency in foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 49: 172–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., Harford, J., & Li, K. 2007. Monitoring: Which institutions matter? Journal of Financial Economics, 86: 279–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J., & Lang, L. 2002. Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of Finance, 57: 2741–2771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, D., Filatotchev, I., Knill, A., Reeb, D., & Senbet, L. 2017. Law, finance, and the international mobility of corporate governance. Journal of International Business Studies, 48: 123–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, D., Knill, A., & Syvrud, K. 2016. Do international investors enhance private firm value? Evidence from venture capital. Journal of International Business Studies, 47: 347–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daske, H., Hail, L., Leuz, C., & Verdi, R. 2008. Mandatory IFRS reporting around the World: Early evidence on the economic consequences. Journal of Accounting Research, 46: 1085–1142.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeAngelo, L., & Skinner, D. 1994. Accounting choice in troubled companies. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17: 13–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dechow, P., & Skinner, D. 2000. Earnings management: Reconciling the views of accounting academics, practitioners, and regulators. Accounting Horizons, 14: 235–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dechow, P., Sloan, R., & Sweeney, A. 1995. Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review, 70: 193–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFond, M., & Park, C. 1997. Smoothing income in anticipation of future earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 23: 115–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Levine, R. 2001. Financial structures and economic growth: A cross-country comparison of banks, markets, and development. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Desai, M., & Dharmapala, D. 2011. Dividend taxes and international portfolio choice. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93: 266–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. 2008. The law and economics of self-dealing. Journal of Financial Economics, 88: 430–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyck, A., & Zingales, L. 2004. Private benefits of control: An international comparison. Journal of Finance, 59: 537–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, J. A., Moeller, S. B., Schlingemann, F. P., & Stulz, R. M. 2017. Portable country governance and cross-border acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 48: 148–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, V., Maffett, M., & Zhang, B. 2015. Foreign institutional ownership and the global convergence of financial reporting practices. Journal of Accounting Research, 53: 593–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, M., & Matos, P. 2008. The colors of investors’ money: The role of institutional investors around the world. Journal of Financial Economics, 88: 499–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannetti, M., & Laeven, L. 2009. Pension reform, ownership structure, and corporate governance: Evidence from a natural experiment. Review of Financial Studies, 22: 4091–4127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopalan, R., & Jayaraman, S. 2012. Private control benefits and earnings management: Evidence from insider controlled firms. Journal of Accounting Research, 50: 117–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guay, W., Kothari, S. P., & Watts, R. 1996. Evaluating discretionary accrual-based models. Journal of Accounting Research, 34: 83–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hail, L., Leuz, C., & Wysocki, P. 2009. Global accounting convergence and the potential adoption of IFRS by the United States: An analysis of economic and policy factors. Working paper.

  • Hazarika, S., Karpoff, J., & Nahata, R. 2012. Internal corporate governance, CEO turnover, and earnings management. Journal of Financial Economics, 104: 44–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy, P. 1985. The effects of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7: 85–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy, P., & Palepu, K. 1995. The challenges of investor communication. Journal of Financial Economics, 38: 111–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy, P., & Wahlen, J. 1999. A review of the earnings management literature and its implication for standard setting. Accounting Horizons, 13: 365–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holthausen, R. W., Larcker, D., & Sloan, R. 1995. Annual bonus schemes and the manipulation of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19: 29–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hribar, P., & Nichols, D. 2007. The use of unsigned earnings quality measures in tests of earnings management. Journal of Accounting Research, 45: 1017–1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, M., Kim, Y., & Li, S. 2018. Political connections and voluntary disclosure: Evidence from around the world. Journal of International Business Studies, 49: 272–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. 2005. Agency costs of overvalued equity. Financial Management, 34: 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, K., Saunders, A., & Senbet, L. 2000. A theory of bank regulation and management compensation. Review of Financial Studies, 13: 95–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, K., & Senbet, L. 1988. Corporate governance and board effectiveness. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22: 371–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. 1991. Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research, 29: 193–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. B., Pevzer, M., Xin, X. 2018. Foreign institutional ownership and auditor choice: Evidence from worldwide institutional ownership. Journal of International Business Studies. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-018-0160-x

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, A. 2002. Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33: 375–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. 1999. Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54: 471–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. 2006. What works in securities laws? Journal of Finance, 61: 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, M., Lins, K., & Miller, D. 2003. ADRs, analysts, and accuracy: Does cross listing in the United States improve a firm’s information environment and increase market value? Journal of Accounting Research, 41: 317–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, M., Lins, K., & Miller, D. 2004. Concentrated control, analyst following, and valuation: Do analysts matter most when investors are protected less? Journal of Accounting Research, 42: 589–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, M., Raedy, J., & Wilson, W. 2006. Earnings management and cross listing: Are reconciled earnings comparable to US earnings? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42: 255–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lel, U., & Miller, D. 2008. International cross-listing, firm performance and top management turnover: A test of the bonding hypothesis. Journal of Finance, 63: 1897–1937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuz, C. 2010. Different approaches to corporate reporting regulation: How jurisdictions differ and why. Accounting and Business Research, 40: 229–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuz, C., Lins, K., & Warnock, F. 2010. Do foreigners invest less in poorly governed firms? Review of Financial Studies, 23: 3245–3285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuz, C., Nanda, D., & Wysocki, P. 2003. Earnings management and investor protection: An international comparison. Journal of Financial Economics, 69: 505–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, R. 1997. Financial development and economic growth: Views and agenda. Journal of Economic Literature, 3592: 688–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lins, K. 2003. Equity ownership and firm value in emerging markets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38: 159–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massa, M., & Zhang, L. 2018. Does corporate hedging attract foreign institutional investors? Evidence from international firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 49: 605–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morck, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 1988. Management ownership and market valuation. Journal of Financial Economics, 20: 293–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peasnell, K. V., Pope, P. F., & Young, S. 2005. Board monitoring and earnings management: Do outside directors influence abnormal accruals? Journal of Business, Finance, and Accounting, 32: 1311–1346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raddatz, C., & Schmukler, S. 2012. On the international transmission of shocks: Micro-evidence from mutual fund portfolios. Journal of International Economics, 88: 357–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramalingegowda, S., & Yu, Y. 2012. Institutional investors and accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53: 98–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rountree, B., Weston, J., & Allayannis, G. 2008. Do investors value smooth performance? Journal of Financial Economics, 90: 237–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 1986. Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94: 461–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52: 737–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, D., & Sloan, R. 2002. Earnings surprises, growth expectations, and stock returns. Review of Accounting Studies, 7: 289–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramanyam, K. 1996. The pricing of discretionary accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 22: 249–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, R. 2003. Conservatism in accounting. Part I: Explanations and implications. Accounting Horizons, 17: 207–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Lemma Senbet (the editor), two anonymous reviewers, David Godsell, Christian Leuz, Karl Lins, Sattar Mansi, and Darius Miller for their helpful comments. I also thank Ricardo Correa for providing some data for the sample firms. All errors are my sole responsibility.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ugur Lel.

Additional information

Accepted by Lemma Senbet, Area Editor, 11 October 2018. This article has been with the author for four revisions.

Appendix

Appendix

This appendix reports variable definitions as well as additional results on the impact of foreign and domestic institutional ownership on earnings management. Table 10 provides definitions of variables used throughout the paper. In Table 11, countries with an average depth (the ratio of the number of firms to the number of observations) of less than the sample median of 4.96 are excluded. Table 12 presents OLS estimates of the relationship between FIIs and the extent of earnings management by legal origin (French, German, Scandinavian, and English). Table 13 presents the estimates of the impact of FIIs on the extent of earnings management before and after the global financial crisis of 2008. Table 14 presents the estimates of the impact of FIIs on the extent of earnings management where FII ownership is proxied by a dummy variable that equals one for non-zero levels of FII ownership, zero otherwise. Table 15 presents estimates of the relationship between FIIs and the extent of earnings management on a country by country basis.

Table 10 Variable definitions
Table 11 Robustness check based on sample depth
Table 12 The impact of FIIs and DIIs on corporate earnings management by type of legal origin
Table 13 The impact of FIIs and DIIs on corporate earnings management before and after the global financial crisis
Table 14 An alternative proxy for foreign institutional ownership
Table 15 Country-by-country regression analysis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lel, U. The role of foreign institutional investors in restraining earnings management activities across countries. J Int Bus Stud 50, 895–922 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-018-0195-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-018-0195-z

Keywords

Navigation