Skip to main content
Log in

A review of information system integration in mergers and acquisitions

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Journal of Information Technology

Abstract

For three decades, research has investigated the role of information systems integration (ISI) in mergers and acquisitions (M&As). This research has improved our understanding of the M&A IS challenges and their solutions. However, consolidation and integration across the research is limited. To redress this omission, we review 70 articles published between 1989 and 2016. To do this, we adopt and extend the methodology developed by Lacity and her colleagues to review the empirical evidence in a fragmented IT literature. We code 53 dependent variables and 195 independent variables to identify the robust relationships among them and to model how ISI decisions, including the choice of IS integration methods, partially mediate the effects of the independent variables on ISI outcomes. Examining the relationships in this model, we identify five quasi-independent thematic domains on which we draw to develop an agenda for future research. Our contribution is the aggregation, organization and structuring of the empirical findings in the M&A ISI literature as a basis on which to develop a cumulative knowledge process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Accenture (2006). Executives Report that Mergers and Acquisitions Fail to Create Adequate Value [WWW document] http://newsroom.accenture.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=4364 (accessed 10th July 2007).

  • Al Suliman, M.H. (2015). In Mergers and Acquisitions-IT: Results of the Absence of CIO in Ex-ante Planning and the Absence of Key IT Staff in Ex-post Integration. The Claremont Graduate University, Unpublished PhD thesis.

  • Alaranta, M. and Henningsson, S. (2007). Shaping the Post-Merger Information Systems Integration Strategy, in Proceedings of Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Waikoloa, USA, 2007); Chicago: IEEE Computer Society Press.

  • Alaranta, M. and Henningsson, S. (2008). An Approach to Analyzing and Planning Post-Merger IS Integration: Insights from two Field Studies. Information Systems Frontiers, 10(3), 307–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alaranta, M. and Kautz, K. (2012). A Framework for Understanding Post-Merger Information Systems Integration. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 13(1), 5–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alaranta, M.E. and Martela, E. (2012). Overcoming Knowledge Gaps in Postmerger Integration, in Proceedings of International Conference on Information Systems (Orlando, USA, 2012); Atlanta, USA: Association for Information Systems.

  • Baker, E.W. and Niederman, F. (2014). Integrating the IS Functions After Mergers and Acquisitions: Analyzing Business-IT Alignment. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 23(2), 112–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, C. and Clark, K. (2000). Design Rules. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, L. and Larsson, R. (2012). Researching Mergers and Acquisitions with the Case Study Method: Idiographic Understanding of Longitudinal Integration Processes, Handbook Of Research On Mergers And Acquisitions (Ed, Weber, Y.) Elgar Publishing.

  • Benitez-Amado, J. and Ray, G. (2012). Introducing IT-enabled Business Flexibility and IT Integration in the Acquirer’s M&A Performance Equation, in Proceedings of International Conference on Information Systems (Orlando, USA, 2012); Atlanta, USA: Association for Information Systems.

  • Bhattacharya, P. (2016). Identifying Four Key Means of Business Value Creation using Enterprise Systems: An Empirical Study. Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 25(1), 19–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boell, S.K. and Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2015a). Debating Systematic Literature Reviews (SLR) and Their Ramifications for IS: A Rejoinder to Mike Chiasson, Briony Oates, Ulrike Schultze, and Richard Watson. Journal of Information Technology, 30(2), 188–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boell, S.K. and Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2015b). On Being ‘Systematic’ in Literature Reviews in IS. Journal of Information Technology, 30(2), 161–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhm, M., Henningsson, S., Leimeister, J.M., Yetton, P. and Krcmar, H. (2011). A Dual View on IT Challenges in Corporate Divestments and Acquisitions, in Proceedings of International Conference on Information Systems (Shanghai, China, 2011); Atlanta, USA: Association for Information Systems.

  • Boudon, R., Clark, J., Modgil, C., Modgil, S., Cohen, I.B., Duffin, K., et al. (1991). What Middle-range Theories Are. Contemporary Sociology, 20(4), 519–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C.V., Clancy, G., and Scholer, R. (2003). A Post-Merger IT Integration Success Story: Sallie Mae. MIS Quarterly Executive, 2(1), 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunetto, G. (2006). Integrating Information Systems During Mergers: Integration Modes Typology, Prescribed vs Constructed Implementation Process, in Proceedings of European Conference on Information Systems (Gothenburg, Sweden, 2006); Atlanta, USA: Association for Information Systems.

  • Buck-Lew, M., Wardle, C.E., and Pliskin, N. (1992). Accounting for Information Technology in Corporate Acquisitions. Information & Management, 22(6), 363–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busquets, J. (2015). Discovery Paths: Exploring Emergence and IT Evolutionary design in Cross-Border M&As. Analysing grupo Santander’s Acquisition of Abbey (2004–2009). European Journal of Information Systems, 24(2), 178–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S.-I., Chang, I.-C., and Wang, T. (2014). Information Systems Integration After Merger and Acquisition. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114(1), 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R.M. and March, J.G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhillon, G., Syed, R. and Pedron, C. (2016). Interpreting Information Security Culture: An Organizational Transformation Case Study, Computers & Security 56(February 2016): 63–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, K. (2015). Research Note—Parenting New Acquisitions: Acquirers’ Digital Resource Redeployment and Targets’ Performance Improvement in the US Hospital Industry. Information Systems Research, 26(4), 829–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, N.B. (1995). Capturing flexibility of Information Technology Infrastructure: A Study of Resource Characteristics and Their Measure. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(2), 37–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J.E. and Duncan, R.B. (1987). The Creation of Momentum for Change through the Process of Strategic Issue Diagnosis. Strategic Management Journal, 8(3), 279–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J E. and Jackson, S.E. (1987). Categorizing Strategic Issues: Links to Organizational Action. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 76–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, M.-L., Freitag, A., Matthes, F., Roth, S. and Schulz, C. (2012). Decision Support for Selecting an Application Landscape Integration Strategy in Mergers and Acquisitions, in Proceedings of European Conference on Information Systems (Barcelona, Spain, 2012); Atlanta, USA: Association for Information Systems.

  • Freitag, A., Matthes, F. and Schulz, C. (2010). A Method for Consolidating Application Landscapes During the Post-Merger-Integration Phase, in Proceedings of International Multiconference on Computer Science and Information Technology (IMCSIT) (Wisla, Poland, 2010), pp. 241–248; Chicago, USA: IEEE Computer Society Press.

  • Garcia-Canal, E., Rialp-Criado, A., and Rialp-Criado, J. (2013). Speed of ICT Integration Strategies in Absorptions: Insights from a Qualitative Study. European Management Journal, 31(3), 295–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giacomazzi, F., Panella, C., Pernici, B. and Sansoni, M. (1997). Information Systems Integration in Mergers and Acquisitions: A Normative Model. Information & Management, 32(6), 289–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glazar-Stavnicky, M. (2016). Organizational and Systems Factors Leading to Systems Integration Success after Merger and Acquisition. Cleveland State University, Unpublished PhD thesis.

  • Gorla, N. and Pang, P. (2001). Fit Between MIS Integration Strategies and Business Acquisition Strategies. ASCI Journal of Management, 30(1&2), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graebner, M.E., Eisenhardt, K.M. and Roundy, P.T. (2010). Success and Failure in Technology Acquisitions: Lessons for Buyers and Sellers. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3), 73–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R.M. (1996). Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(52), 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R.W., Keil, M. and Muntermann, J. (2012). Ambidextrous IS Strategy: The Dynamic Balancing Act of Developing a ‘Transform & Merge’ Strategy in the Banking Industry, in Proceedings of International Conference of Information Systems (Orlando, USA, 2012); Atlanta, USA: Association for Information Systems.

  • Haleblian, J., Devers, C.E., McNamara, G., Carpenter, M.A., and Davison, R.B. (2009). Taking Stock of What We Know About Mergers and Acquisitions: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management, 35(3), 469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haspeslagh, C. and Jemison, B. (1991). Managing Acquisitions. Creating Value Through Corporate Renewal. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfat, C.E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D., et al. (2009). Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations. Hobocken, USA: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henningsson, S. (2015). Learning to Acquire: How Serial Acquirers Build Organisational Knowledge for Information Systems Integration. European Journal of Information Systems, 24(2), 121–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henningsson, S. and Carlsson, S.A. (2011). The DySIIM Model for Managing IS integration in Mergers and Acquisitions. Information Systems Journal, 21(5), 441–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henningsson, S. and Kettinger, W.J. (2016). Managing IT Integration Risk in Acquisitions. MIS Quarterly Executive, 15(1), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henningsson, S., Kude, T. and Popp, K.M. (2016). Managing the Technology Acquisition Integration Paradox at SAP, in Proceedings of International Conference of Information Systems (Dublin, Ireland, 2016); Atlanta, USA: Association for Information Systems.

  • Henningsson, S. and Øhrgaard, C. (2016). IT Consultants in Acquisition IT Integration. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 58(3), 193–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henningsson, S., Svensson, C. and Vallen, L. (2007). Mastering the Integration Chaos Following Frequent M&As: IS Integration with SOA Technology, in Proceedings of Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Waikoloa, USA, 2007); Chicago, USA: IEEE Computer Society Press.

  • Henningsson, S. and Yetton, P. (2011). Managing the IT integration of Acquisitions by Multi-Business Organizations, in Proceedings of International Conference of Information Systems (Shanghai, China, 2011); Atlanta, USA: Association for Information Systems.

  • Holm-Larsen, M. (2005). ICT Integration in an M&A Process, in Proceedings of Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (Bangkok, Thailand, 2005); Atlanta, USA: Association for Information Systems.

  • Hsu, J. and Chen, E.T. (2015). The Impact of Mergers and Acquisitions on Information Systems: A Case of A Software Industry Acquisition, Communications of the IIMA 6(1): Article 6.

  • Hunter, J.E. and Schmidt, F.L. (2004). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, R.P. and Ramesh, B. (2015). The Roles of Contextual Elements in Post-Merger Common Platform Development: An Empirical Investigation. European Journal of Information Systems, 24(2), 159–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeyaraj, A., Rottman, J.W. and Lacity, M.C. (2006). A Review of the Predictors, Linkages, and Biases in IT Innovation Adoption Research. Journal of Information Technology, 21(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, K.D. and Yetton, P.W. (1996). Integrating Information Technology Divisions in a Bank Merger—Fit, Compatibility and Models of Change. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 5(3), 189–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R.M., Yatsko, P. and Raffaelli, R. (2007). CEMEX (A): Building the Global Framework (1985–2004). In: Harvard Business Review Cases. Harvard Business School.

  • Kengelbach, J., Klemmer, D.C., Schwetzler, B., Sperling, M.O. and Roos, A. (2011). How the Top Serial Acquirers Create Value [WWW document] https://www.bcgperspectives.com/content/articles/mergers_acquisitions_value_creation_strategy_does_practice_make_perfect_top_serial_acquirers/ (accessed 7th July 2016).

  • Kiesler, S. and Sproull, L. (1982). Managerial Response to Changing Environments: Perspectives on Problem Sensing from Social Cognition. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(4), 548–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H.-G., Iijima, J. and Ho, S. (2005). A Framework for Analysis of Systems Failure in Information Systems Integration. Industrial Engineering and Management Systems, 4(2), 207–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, D.R., Dalton, D.R., Daily, C.M. and Covin, J.G. (2004). Meta-Analyses of Post-Acquisition Performance: Indications of Unidentified Moderators. Strategic Management Journal, 25(2), 187–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovela, S. and Skok, W. (2012). Mergers and Acquisitions in Banking: Understanding the IT Integration Perspective. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(18), 69–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labusch, N., Koebele, F., Aier, S. and Winter, R. (2013). The Architects’ Perspective on Enterprise Transformation: An Explorative Study, in Proceedings of Practice-Driven Research on Enterprise Transformation (Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2013); Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacity, M.C., Khan, S. and Yan, A. (2016). Review of the Empirical Business Services Sourcing Literature: An Update and Future Directions. Journal of Information Technology, 21(3), 269–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacity, M.C., Khan, S., Yan, A. and Willcocks, L.P. (2010). A Review of the IT Outsourcing Empirical Literature and Future Research Directions. Journal of Information Technology, 25(4), 395–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacity, M.C., Solomon, S., Yan, A. and Willcocks, L.P. (2011). Business Process Outsourcing Studies: A Critical Review and Research Directions. Journal of Information Technology, 26(4), 221–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A.S. (2015). Retrospect and Prospect: Information Systems Research in the Last and Next 25 Years. Journal of Information Technology, 25(4), 336–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeFave, R., Branch, B., Brown, C.V. and Wixom, B. (2008). How Sprint Nextel Reconfigured IT Resources for Results. MIS Quarterly Executive, 7(4), 171–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leidner, D.E. and Kayworth, T. (2006). A Review of Culture in Information Systems Research: Toward a Theory of Information Technology Culture Conflict. MIS Quarterly, 30(2), 357–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, F. and Chao, R. (2008). Post-Merger IT integration: An IT Culture Conflict Perspective, in Proceedings of Pacific-Asia Conference on Information Systems (Suzhou, China, 2008); Association for Information Systems.

  • Linder, J.C. (1989). Integrating Organizations where Information Technology Matters. Harvard University, Graduate School of Business Administration. Unpublished PhD thesis.

  • Main, T.J. and Short, J.E. (1989). Managing the Merger: Building Partnership through IT Planning at the New Baxter. MIS Quarterly, 13(4), 469–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T.W. and Crowston, K. (1994). The Interdisciplinary Study of Coordination. ACM Computing Surveys, 26(1), 87–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. and Simon, H.A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKiernan, P. and Merali, Y. (1995). Integrating Information Systems After a Merger. Long Range Planning, 28(4), 454–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medema, S.G. (1996). Coase, Costs, and Coordination. Journal of Economic Issues, 30(2), 571–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, M. and Hirschheim, R. (2007). Strategic Alignment in Mergers and Acquisitions: Theorizing IS Integration Decision Making. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(3), 143–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merali, Y. and McKiernan, P. (1993). The Strategic Positioning of Information Systems in Post-Acquisition Management. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2(2), 105–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morsell, G.A., Deek, F. and Chakrabarti, A. (2009). Post-Merger Technology Integration: Influential Organization and Information Systems Factors, in Proceedings of Americas Conference on Information Systems (San Francisco, USA, 2009); Atlanta, USA: Association for Information Systems.

  • Myers, M.D. (2008). Integration of Different ERP Systems: The Case of Mergers and Acquisitions, in Proceedings of Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (Suzhou, China, 2008); Atlanta, USA: Association for Information Systems.

  • Ocasio, W. (1997). Towards an Attention-Based View of the Firm, Strategic Management Journal 18(Summer special issue): 187–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okoli, C. and Schabram, K. (2010). A Guide to Conducting a Systematic Literature Review of Information Systems Research, Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems 10(26).

  • Reynolds, P. and Yetton, P. (2015). Aligning Business and IT Strategies in Multi-Business Organizations. Journal of Information Technology, 30(2), 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, W.B. and Seidmann, A.B. (1992). Incomplete Contracting Issues in Information Systems Development Outsourcing. Decision Support Systems, 8(5), 459–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, S.S. and Stylianou, A.C. (1999). Post-Merger Systems Integration: The Impact on IS Capabilities. Information & Management, 36(4), 205–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, S. and Powell, P. (2001). Managing the IS Function During Mergers, in Proceedings of European Conference on Information Systems (Bled, Slovenia, 2001); Atlanta, USA: Association for Information Systems.

  • Ross, J.W., Weill, P. and Robertson, D. (2006). Enterprise Architecture as Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution. Boston, MA, United States: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, F. (2014). What Literature Review is Not: Diversity, Boundaries and Recommendations. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(3), 241–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saldaña, J. (2009). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarrazin, H. and West, A. (2011). Understanding the Strategic Value of IT in M&A. McKinsey Quarterly, 12(1), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schonewille, J. and Bouwman, W. (2012). Contextual Aspects in Enterprise Integration, in Proceedings of 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (Maui, USA, 2012); Chicago, USA: IEEE Computer Society.

  • Scott Morton, M.S. (1991). The Corporation of the 1990s: Information Technology and Organizational Transformation. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seddon, P.B., Reynolds, P. and Willcocks, L.P. (2010). Post-Merger IT integration: A Comparison of two Case Studies, in Proceedings of Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (Taipei, Taiwan, 2010); Atlanta, USA: Association for Information Systems.

  • Steininger, K., Kempinger, B., Schiffer, S. and Pomberger, G. (2016a). Critical IS Success Factor Analysis in the Context of a Hospital Merger, in Proceedings of Americas Conference on Information Systems (San Diego, 2016); Atlanta, USA: Association for Information Systems.

  • Steininger, K., Kempinger, B., Schiffer, S. and Pomberger, G. (2016b). A Process Model for IT Migrations in the Context of a Hospital Merger-Results from an Austrian Case Study. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 223(1), 182–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques., Thousand Oaks, USA: Sage.

  • Stylianou, A.C., Jeffries, C.J. and Robbins, S.S. (1996). Corporate Mergers and the Problems of IS Integration. Information & Management, 31(4), 203–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumi, T. and Tsuruoka, M. (2002). Ramp New Enterprise Information Systems in a Merger & Acquisition Environment: A Case Study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 19(1), 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tafti, A.R. (2009). The Role of Information Technology in Alliances and Mergers. University of Michigan. Unpublished PhD Thesis.

  • Tanriverdi, H. and Uysal, V.B. (2011). Cross-Business Information Technology Integration and Acquirer Value Creation in Corporate Mergers and Acquisitions. Information Systems Research, 22(4), 703–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanriverdi, H. and Uysal, V.B. (2015). When IT Capabilities are not Scale-Free in Merger and Acquisition Integrations: How do Capital Markets React to IT capability Asymmetries Between Acquirer and Target? European Journal of Information Systems, 24(2), 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J.D. (1967). Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (1st ed.). Edison, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson Reuters (2017). Mergers & Acquisitions Review - Full Year 2016 [WWW document] http://share.thomsonreuters.com/general/PR/MA_4Q_2016_E.pdf (accessed 10th February 2017).

  • Tiwana, A. and Konsynski, B. (2010). Complementarities Between Organizational IT Architecture and Governance Structure. Information Systems Research, 21(2), 288–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toppenberg, G. (2015). Expanded Understanding of IS/IT Related Challenges in Mergers and Acquisitions: Methods & Research Context, in Proceedings of European Conference on Information Systems (Münster, Germany, 2015); Atlanta, USA: Association for Information Systems.

  • Toppenberg, G., Henningsson, S. and Shanks, G. (2015). How Cisco Systems Used Enterprise Architecture Capability to Sustain Acquisition-Based Growth. MIS Quarterly Executive, 14(4), 151–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unkan, E. and Thönssen, B. (2015). EPOs, an Early Warning System for Post-merger IS Integration, in Proceedings of International Conference on Business Information Systems (Leipzig, Germany; 2015); Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vaniya, N., Bernus, P. and Noran, O. (2013). Analysing the M&A Preparedness Building Approach, in Proceedings of International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (Angers, France, 2013); Berlin: Springer.

  • Vieru, D. and Rivard, S. (2014). Organizational Identity Challenges in a Post-Merger Context: A Case Study of an Information System Implementation Project. International Journal of Information Management, 34(3), 381–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieru, D. and Rivard, S. (2015). Knowledge Sharing Challenges during Post-Merger Integration: The Role of Boundary Spanners and of Organizational Identity. International Journal of Business and Management, 10(11), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieru, D., Rivard, S. and Bourdeau, S. (2016). From Boundary Shaker to Boundary Consolidator by Ways of Symbolic Discourses in a Post-Merger Integration Context, in Proceedings of International Conference on Information Systems (Dublin, Ireland, 2016); Atlanta, USA: Association for Information Systems.

  • Walsh, J.P. (1995). Managerial and Organizational Cognition: Notes from a Trip Down Memory Lane. Organization Science, 6(3), 280–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Y. and Pliskin, N. (1996). The Effects of Information Systems Integration and Organizational Culture on a Firm’s Effectiveness. Information & Management, 30(2), 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J. and Watson, R.T. (2002). Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review, MIS Quarterly 26(2): xiii–xxiii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijnhoven, F., Spil, T., Stegwee, R. and Fa, R.T.A. (2006). Post-Merger IT Integration Strategies: An IT Alignment Perspective. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 15(1), 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G.S., Mayer, R.W., Chien, W.-W. and Williams, C.R. (2015). Information Technology Integration in a Postmerger Environment. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 12(1), 39–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, P.J. (2016). Developing Acquisition IS Integration Capabilities: The Learning Processes of Novice Acquirers, in Proceedings of Australasian Conference on Information Systems (Wollongong, Australia, 2016); Atlanta, USA: Association for Information Systems.

  • Yetton, P., Henningsson, S. and Bjørn-Andersen, N. (2013). “Ready to Acquire”: The IT Resources Required for a Growth-by-Acquisition Business Strategy. MIS Quarterly Executive, 12(1), 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We want to thank the senior editor and the reviewers for their valuable constructive feedback during the review process. We also want to thank Joan Spiller her editorial comments on an earlier draft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Henningsson.

Appendices

Appendix A: Paper overview

See Tables A1, A2, A3 and A4.

Table A1 Papers in the review.
Table A2 Research methods.
Table A3 Object of study.
Table A4 Theoretical framework.

Appendix B: Master variables

See Tables B1 and B2.

Table B1 Independent master variables.
Table B2 Dependent master variables.

Appendix C: Dependent and independent variables in the review

Dependent variables

We identify 53 different dependent variables (Table C1). Following Lacity et al. (2010, 2011, 2016), we distinguish between decision and outcome variables. Decision variables refer to the options to implement ISI. Outcome variables capture the various costs and benefits contingent on the ISI project. Twenty-seven percent of the findings refer to relationships that predict the choice of ISI decisions. Seventy-three percent of relationships concern the outcomes of ISI decisions.

Table C1 Dependent variables used in research on ISI in mergers.

Independent variables

Our investigation identified 195 independent variables in the extant literature on ISI. To facilitate the analysis and discussion of this number of variables, we group them into 12 clusters and sort them by frequency of use (Table C2).

Table C2 Independent variables.

Appendix D: Relational details

See Table D1.

Table D1 Relations between independent and dependent variables.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Henningsson, S., Yetton, P.W. & Wynne, P.J. A review of information system integration in mergers and acquisitions. J Inf Technol 33, 255–303 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41265-017-0051-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41265-017-0051-9

Keywords

Navigation