Advertisement

Place Branding and Public Diplomacy

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 36–46 | Cite as

The evolution of Chinese public diplomacy and the rise of think tanks

  • Hak Yin Li
  • Seanon Wong
Original Article

Abstract

The evolution and change of Chinese public diplomacy can be seen from panda diplomacy, the Confucius Institutes, Chinese mass media’s “going out” strategy as well as various international events such as the 2008 Beijing Olympics and the 2010 World Expo in Shanghai. Some substantial studies have found that these Chinese public diplomacies could not help much in terms of improving China’s image or enhancing Western understanding of China. This article aims at examining the latest Chinese policy instrument—think tanks—to see if they can boost Chinese soft power. In addition, this article illustrates the Chinese think tanks from an institutional perspective by studying their contribution in the One Belt One Road (OBOR) Initiative through the case studies of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS) and Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies at Renmin University of China (RDCY). The Chinese think tanks have played an important role in targeting foreign publics and working on track II diplomacy. However, there is still room for improvement. The major sources of this article are derived from published materials, websites of Chinese institutions and interviews.

Keywords

Chinese public diplomacy Soft power Think tanks Tack II diplomacy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their appreciation to the Global China Research Programme of the Chinese University of Hong Kong for sponsoring a field trip to Beijing.

References

  1. Abelson, D. 2002. Do Think Tanks Matter? Assessing the Impact of Public Policy Institutes, 49–55. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Chen, K. 2014. Zhōngguó zhìkù guójì huà zhuǎnxíng de kùnjìng yǔ chūlù [The dilemma of Chinese think tanks’ internationalization and its solution]. Xiàndài guójì guānxì (Contemporary International Relations) 3: 33, 35.Google Scholar
  3. Chen, D. 2015. The Rise of China’s New Soft Power. The Diplomat, 9 June, http://thediplomat.com/2015/06/the-rise-of-chinas-new-soft-power, accessed 8 August 2017.
  4. China Daily. 2017a. Chinese dream. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/Chinese-dream.html, accessed 11 September 2017.
  5. China Daily. 2017b. China’s panda diplomacy helps strengthen ties with Europe, 17 October, http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/opinion/2017-10/17/content_33351684.htm, accessed 20 October 2017.
  6. Chinese Social Science Net. 2017. Yīdài yīlù” zhìkù hézuò liánméng yántǎo huì zhàokāi [The opening of Silk Road Think Tank Association Conference], 27 February, http://www.cssn.cn/zk/zk_jsxx/zk_zx/201702/t20170227_3430818.shtml, accessed 12 August 2017.
  7. Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies at Renmin University of China (RDCY). 2017. Belt and Road Series, 8 May, http://en.rdcy.org/displaynews.php?id=33090, accessed 11 August 2017.
  8. Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies at Renmin University of China (RDCY). n.d.a. About Us. http://en.rdcy.org/more.php?cid=799, accessed 11 August 2017.
  9. Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies at Renmin University of China (RDCY). n.d.b. Thoughts that Shape Global Governance—The Participation of the RDCY in the OBOR. Internal RDCY report. Unpublished.Google Scholar
  10. Creemers, R. 2015. Never the Twain Shall Meet? Rethinking China’s Pubic Diplomacy. Chinese Journal of Communication 8 (3): 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. d’Hooghe, I. 2014. China’s Public Diplomacy, 283. Leiden: BRILL.Google Scholar
  12. Fairbank, J.K. 1969. China’s Foreign Policy in Historical Perspective. Foreign Affairs 47 (3): 455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ferdinand, P. 2016. Westward Ho—THE CHINA DREAM and “One Belt, One Road”: Chinese Foreign Policy Under Xi Jinping. International Affairs 92 (4): 941–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Financial Times. 2015. China’s ‘One Belt One Road’ Plan Greeted with Caution, 20 November, https://www.ft.com/content/5c022b50-78b7-11e5-933d-efcdc3c11c89, accessed 9 August 2017.
  15. Fu, Y. 2015. Interaction Key for Think Tanks. China Daily, 18 April, http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/opinion/2015-04/18/content_20465823.htm, accessed 8 August 2017.
  16. Globescan. 2017. Sharp Drop in World Views of US, UK: Global poll, 4 July, http://www.globescan.com/news-and-analysis/press-releases/press-releases-2017/420-sharp-drop-in-world-views-of-us-uk-global-poll.html, accessed 8 August 2017.
  17. Hartig, F. 2013. Panda diplomacy: The cutest part of China’s public diplomacy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 8: 60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hartig, F. 2016. Chinese Public Diplomacy: The Rise of the Confucius Institute, 99–102. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Huang, Y. 2016. Understanding China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Motivation, framework and assessment. China Economic Review 40: 314–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. IFENG.COM. 2012. Wài méi rè yì hújǐntāo “qiú shì” wénzhāng: Zhōngguó fènlì dǐyù xīfāng wénhuà [Hu Jintao’s Article on Qiushi is Widely Discussed by Foreign Mass Media: China Resists Western Culture], 5 January, http://news.ifeng.com/mainland/detail_2012_01/05/11767409_0.shtml, accessed 8 August 2017.
  21. Kurlantzick, J. 2007. Charm Offensive: How China’s Soft Power is Transforming the World. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Lewis, M.E. 2009. China’s Cosmopolitan Empire: The Tang Dynasty. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Li, T. 2011. Zhōngguó mínjiān wàijiāo de lìshǐ hé xiànzhuàng fēnxī [The analysis of the history and current status of Chinese public diplomacy]. Lǐlùn guānchá (Theoretic Observation) 1: 72.Google Scholar
  24. Li, J. 2017. Yīdài yīlù yánjiū cóngshū zhōng yīngwén bǎn miànshì [The English version of the OBOR publications are now available]. State Administration of Press, Publication, Radio, Film and Television of the People’s Republic of China, 22 May, http://www.sapprft.gov.cn/sapprft/contents/10421/334052.shtml, accessed 11 August 2017.
  25. McGann, J. 2011. Global Think Tanks: Policy Networks and Governance, 14. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. McGann, J. 2017. 2016 Global Go to Think Tank Index Report, 26 January, https://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks/12/, accessed 8 August 2017.
  27. Melissen, J. 2005. The New Public Diplomacy: Between Theory and Practice. In The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations, ed. J. Melissen, 4–5. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China. 2016. Zhuazhou Ceremony held in Washington D.C. to Celebrate Panda Bei Bei’s First Birthday, 22 August, http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/wjb_663304/zwjg_665342/zwbd_665378/t1390762.shtml, accessed 20 October 2017.
  29. Nye, J. 2004. Soft Power—The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  30. Simons, G. 2015. Taking the New Public Diplomacy Online: Russia and China. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 11 (2): 117–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. South China Morning Post. 2013. Just What is Xi Jinping’s ‘Chinese Dream’ and ‘Chinese Renaissance’? 6 February, http://www.scmp.com/news/china/article/1143954/just-what-xi-jinpings-chinese-dream-and-chinese-renaissance, accessed 11 September 2017.
  32. South China Morning Post. 2014. Think tanks face hurdle in answering Xi Jinping’s call, 3 November, http://www.scmp.com/news/china/article/1630831/think-tanks-face-hurdle-answering-xi-jinpings-call, accessed 8 August 2017.
  33. South China Morning Post. 2017. China’s Think Tanks Overflow, but Most Still Think What They’re Told to Think, 12 February, http://www.scmp.com/week-asia/opinion/arti(cle/2069944/chinas-think-tanks-overflow-most-still-think-what-theyre-told, accessed 8 August 2017.
  34. Sun, H. 2015a. Zhōngguó duì lāměi mínjiān wàijiāo: Yuánqǐ, shìjiàn jí yǐngxiǎng [Chinese public diplomacy towards Latin America: Background, issues and impacts]. Institute of Latin American Studies, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, 23 July, http://ilas.cass.cn/xkjs/kycg/zlgx/201603/t20160317_2927711.shtml, accessed 12 September 2017.
  35. Sun, W. 2015b. Configuring the Foreign Correspondent: New Questions About China’s Public Diplomacy. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 11 (2): 125–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tao, J. and Juan S. 2013. Gōnggòng wàijiāo hūhuàn zhōngguó zhìkù tíshēng nénglì [Public diplomacy appeals to China’s think tanks for stronger capability]. Gōnggòng wàijiāo jìkān (Public Policy Quarterly) 3: 16.Google Scholar
  37. Tao, J. et al. 2013. Wèn zhì yú sī——zhōngguó zhìkù jiēmì [Interviews on scholars about the Chinese think tanks]. Shìjiè Zhīshì (World Affairs) 17: 18, 19.Google Scholar
  38. Time. 2016. China’s Xi Jinping talks up “One Belt, One Road” as keynote project fizzles, 18 August, http://time.com/4457044/xi-jinping-one-belt-one-road-obor-south-china-sea-economic-trade-business, accessed 9 August 2017.
  39. Volodzko, D. 2015. China’s Confucius Institutes and the soft war. The Diplomat, 8 July, http://thediplomat.com/2015/07/chinas-confucius-institutes-and-the-soft-war, accessed 8 August 2017.
  40. Wang, Y. 2008. Public diplomacy and the rise of Chinese soft power. The Annuals of the American Academy 616 (1): 270.Google Scholar
  41. Wang, J. 2013a. Shaping China’s Global Imagination: Branding Nations at the World Expo, 9. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  42. Wang, L. 2013b. Zhōngguó zhìkù jiànshè yǔ gōnggòng wàijiāo tàzhǎn [Development of Think Tanks and Promotion of Public Diplomacy in China]. Gōnggòng wàijiāo jìkān (Public Policy Quarterly) 3: 29.Google Scholar
  43. Wang, W. 2013c. Gōnggòng wàijiāo shàngcè yǐngxiǎng tāguó zhìkù [Top strategy of public diplomacy: Influencing think tanks of other countries]. Gōnggòng wàijiāo jìkān (Public Policy Quarterly) 3: 39–45.Google Scholar
  44. Wang, L. 2015. Quánmiàn tíshēng zhōngguó zhìkù de zhìlì zīběn [Enhance the intellectual capability of Chinese think tanks comprehensively]. Zhōngguó dǎng zhèng gànbù lún tán (Chinese Cadres Tribune) 1: 10.Google Scholar
  45. Wang, H., and Y.C. Lu. 2008. The Conception of Soft Power and Its Policy Implications: A Comparative Study of China and Taiwan. Journal of Contemporary China 17 (56): 427–430.Google Scholar
  46. Wu, Y.S. 2016. China’s Media and Public Diplomacy Approach in Africa: Illustrations from South Africa. Chinese Journal of Communication 9 (1): 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Xinhua. 2015. China to Instill National Characteristics in Think Tanks, 20 January, http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/china/2015-01/20/c_133933763.htm, accessed 8 August 2017.
  48. Xinhua Silk Road Information Service. 2017. Yīdài yīlù” zhìkù gōngzuò chéngjiù zòngshù” [Achievement Report of Chinese Think Tanks on the OBOR], 12 May, http://silkroad.news.cn/2017/0512/32811.shtml, accessed 10 August 2017.
  49. Yang, J. 2011. Endeavor to open a new horizon of public diplomacy with Chinese charxacteristics. Office of the Commissioner of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, 16 February, http://www.fmcoprc.gov.hk/eng/zgwjsw/t801925.htm, accessed 9 August 2017.
  50. Yīdài yīlù shùjùkù [The database of OBOR]. n.d. http://www.ydylcn.com/skwx_ydyl/sublibrary?SiteID=1&ID=8721, accessed 11 August 2017.
  51. Zhang, X. 2011. China’s international broadcasting: the case of CCTV International. In Soft Power in China: Public Diplomacy through Communication, ed. J. Wang, 57–71. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhang, C. 2013. Zhōngguó zhìkù zhǎnkāi gōnggòng wàijiāo de sìcè [Four strategies for China’s think tanks to develop public diplomacy]. Gōnggòng wàijiāo jìkān (Public Policy Quarterly) 3: 33-38.Google Scholar
  53. Zhao, K. 2015. The Motivation Behind China’s Public Diplomacy. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 8 (2): 196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhao, K. 2016. China’s Rise and Its Discursive Power Strategy. Chinese Political Science Review.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-016-0027-x.Google Scholar
  55. Zhou, Y., and S. Luk. 2016. Establishing Confucius Institutes: A Tool for Promoting China’s Soft Power. Journal of Contemporary China 25 (100): 628–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhu, X. 2013. The Rise of Think Tanks in China, 17. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.United CollegeThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatinHong Kong
  2. 2.United CollegeThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatinHong Kong

Personalised recommendations