Skip to main content
Log in

Reproducible media in the early fifteenth century, mostly Italian

  • Original Article
  • Published:
postmedieval: a journal of medieval cultural studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The fifteenth century embraced reproducible multiples with a concentrated zest and variety never before seen. The processes allowed for the production of objects, sometimes hundreds or thousands of them, that were largely indistinguishable from one another: plaquettes, portrait medals, engravings, printed book and type design; cartapesta and terracotta Madonna and Child sculptures, the re-emergence of small bronzes, or, slightly later, etchings, or glazed terracottas that could be assembled in any number of arrangements (not to mention earlier traditions in woodcut prints and coins). Many of the reproducible media types had proliferated for a decade or more before Gutenberg's successful machine was introduced around 1450. It would seem that some of these media, or more precisely the multiples milieu in which they emerged and thrived, facilitated the printing press's ultimate success. What do these objects reveal about the contemporaneous dynamic between art and the ‘market’ for art, between patron and artist, between the audience and the ‘aura’ of the original?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Coins had been in continual use in various shapes, sizes, designs and denominations since their earliest use. Striking coins followed the same basic principles that had been in use since the introduction of struck coinage in Lydia some 2000 years earlier. Upper and lower dies are cut in intaglio in hardened steel. The upper die (trussel) descends, either by hammering or by means of a press, upon the fixed lower die (pile), which holds a softer metal blank (planchet or flan), which is frequently heated, and impresses both obverse and reverse simultaneously. Other than some innovations, such as the return of portraiture on coinage or the standardized value of the gold florin, coins do not represent a new media type or a new technology.Woodblock prints also were not born of the fifteenth century, but became relatively common and inexpensive by that time throughout Europe. Especially popular in the North, the subjects of woodblock prints were frequently religious and sometimes they were produced and sold by monasteries. Playing cards were also stamped using woodblocks, and card sets were exported throughout the continent and England. Because the process of woodblock printing necessitated light pressure, the block could withstand thousands of paper impressions.

  2. Engravings offered infinitely more subtlety in line variation and a freer translation from drawing to engraved image than woodblock prints. The plates were also far more durable than their wooden counterparts allowing larger runs. One of the immediate forerunners of moveable type printed books was the block-book, which set an entire page with text and image (since they were printed in reverse, designers had to be especially careful with text).

  3. Nielli (or prints from niello plaques), a subclass of engravings, effectively combined plaquettes and engraved prints. The palm-sized engraved plates (often in silver) could be printed on paper any number of times, and the plates themselves, what we might call ‘originals’ in this case, also were collected. When a niello plaque was not expected to be printed any further, its incised lines were filled with a silicate which was heated, thus permanently sealing the plaque (Hind, 1936; Blum, 1950).

  4. Variations on the basic casting process have been in use for millennia: the lost-wax process is still the method of choice for bronze casters worldwide. The process starts with a core of clay. A wax model of the desired object is built on top of it. Risers and runners, also in wax, are added to provide channels for even pouring and for gasses and impurities to escape. A layer of extremely fine sand (or a mixture of pulverized tufa, ash and a bonding agent) is added, and then further layers of increasingly coarse sand. Eventually it is encased in plaster. The mold is heated in a kiln and the wax drains out, hence the term ‘lost wax.’ A molten copper alloy (usually bronze or brass) is carefully poured into the mold. The mold cools, then is broken open. Risers and runners are cut off and filed down. The final object is finished to some degree: filed, sharpened with a cold chisel, painted or lacquered, and polished. Fine sand molds, perhaps derived from the casting of pig iron, allowed for multiple casts without destroying the molds or models. For large production runs, multiple molds from a corrected original wax model could be set up to either side of a central pouring channel (Piemontese, 1555, 206–217; Cennini, 1954; Biringuccio, 1959, 324–327; Cellini, 1967).

  5. The artists of these early objects are unknown, and their attributions to specific artists, from Donatello to Sienese masters, continues to encourage debate and speculation. Also relevant are the small bronzes by Ghiberti's workshop affixed to the artist's second set of bronze doors in Florence.

  6. Other experiments with the medium preceded Pisanello's invention, including the struck medals of Francesco I Carrara of Padua, commissioned in the 1390s by his son to commemorate Francesco's safe return to Padua. The struck medals of Gianfrancesco Gonzaga (now lost, but apparently struck in gold and silver in 1433), Ludovico III Gonzaga of Mantua (sometime between 1433 and 1444) and the medals struck by the Sesto brothers in Venice in the 1420s also are relevant, although the latter depict Emperors Galba and Constantine, not contemporaries. Similarly, the large cast medallions of Heraclius and Constantine from the Duke of Berry's collection, from before 1402, are frequently included in lists of precursors to the medal. Struck medals were rare in the fifteenth century, but their potential for large runs far outstripped their cast counterparts. The striking process allowed for huge runs before a die would break, but it constricted the new medium's format. The results were rather coin-like: significantly lighter and smaller in diameter and thickness than cast medals. In the third decade of the sixteenth century Benvenuto Cellini introduced his screw press in Rome, an innovation in the striking process that effectively allowed coins and medals to be made in extremely large numbers with superior detail and registration.

  7. When the term ‘roman’ is used as it pertains to type, it will remain lowercase as is standard.

  8. The copyright restriction was removed the following year, however, on the death of Johannes. It is interesting to note that among the shareholders of Nicolas Jenson's final printing workshop were Donna Paula, Johannes da Spira's widow and his two sons.

References

  • Attwood, P . 2003. Italian Medals c. 1530–1600, 2 vols. London: British Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balbi de Caro, S . 1973. Di alcune medaglie di Paolo II rinvenute nelle mura del Palazzo di Venezia in Roma. Medaglia 5: 24–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartsch, A . 1978–2008. The Illustrated Bartsch, ed. W.L. Strauss et alia. 104 volumes [175 volumes planned]. Norwalk, CT: Abaris. [The unillustrated original is Bartsch, A. 1803–1821. Le Peintre graveur. 21 vols. Vienna, Austria: J.V. Degen.].

  • Baxandall, M . 1986. Giotto and the Orators. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxandall, M . 1988. Painting and Experience in Fifteenth Century Italy, 2nd edn. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, W . 1936. The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. In Illuminations: Essays and Reflections, ed. Hannah Arendt, trans. Harry Zohn, 217–251. New York: Schocken Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biringuccio, V . 1959. Pirotechnia, trans. C.S. Smith and M.T. Gnudi, 324–327. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, A . 1950. Les Nielles du Quattrocento. Paris, France: Compagnie des Arts Photomecaniques.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bode, W . 1922. Die italienischen Bronze-statuetten der Renaissance, 3 vols. Berlin, Germany: Bruno Cassirer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burckhardt, J . 1929. The Civilization of the Renaissance in Italy, trans. S.G.C. Middlemore. New York and London: Harper & Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buringh, E. and J. Luiten Van Zanden . 2009. Charting the ‘Rise of the West’: Manuscripts and Printed Books in Europe, A Long-Term Perspective from the Sixth through Eighteenth Centuries. The Journal of Economic History 69 (2): 409–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannata, P . 1989. Le Placchette del Filarete. In Italian Plaquettes, ed. A. Luchs, 35–54. Washington, DC: The National Gallery of Art.

  • Catich, E . 1968. The Origin of the Serif. Davenport, IA: Catfish Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cellini, B . 1967. The Treatises on Goldsmithing and Sculpture, trans. C.R. Ashbee, 72–74. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cennini, C . 1954. Il libro dell’Arte (The Craftsman's Handbook), trans. D.V. Thompson, Jr. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappell, W . 1970. A Short History of the Printed Word. Boston, MA: Nonpareil Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, B . 1983. The Renaissance Artist at Work. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comanducci, R . 2003. Produzione seriale e mercato dell’arte a Firenze fra Quattro e Cinquecento. In The Art Market in Italy 15th–17th Centuries, eds. M. Fantoni, S. Matthews Grieco and L. Matthew, 105–114. Modena, Italy: Franco Cosimo Panini.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dacos, N . 1989. Le rôle des plaquettes dans la diffusion des gemmes antiques: le cas de la collection Médicis. In Italian Plaquettes, ed. A. Luchs, 71–89. Washington, DC: The National Gallery of Art.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominici, F.G . 1927. Regola del governo di cura familiare, parte quarta: On the education of children, trans. A.B. Coté. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Febvre, L. and H. Martin . 1986. The Coming of the Book: The Impact of Printing 1450–1580. London: Verso Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, A . 2011. Anatomy of a Typeface. Fitzroy & Finn: A Design Partnership, http://www.fitzroyandfinn.co.uk/projects/grafik/ [originally published in Grafik Magazine 146, November 2006], accessed 20 December 2011.

  • Flaten, A . 2003. Identity and the Display of Medaglie in Renaissance and Baroque Europe. Word & Image 19 (1–2): 65–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentilini, G . 1998. I Della Robbia e l’arte nuova della scultura invetriata. Florence, Italy: Giunti.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldthwaite, R . 1982. The Building of Renaissance Florence. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldthwaite, R . 1993. Wealth and the Demand for Art in Italy 1300–1600. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herlihy, D. and C. Klapisch-Zuber . 1985. Tuscans and their Families. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, G . 1930. A Corpus of Italian Medals of the Renaissance before Cellini, 2 vols. London: Oxford University Press. Reprinted and enlarged by J.G. Pollard, Florence, Italy: Studio per Edizione Scelte, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hind, A . 1936. Nielli, Chiefly Italian of the XV Century. London: British Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, A . 1989. Plaquettes on Bookbindings. In Italian Plaquettes, ed. A. Luchs, 165–174. Washington, DC: The National Gallery of Art.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, M . 2004. Copying Practices and Marketing Strategies in a Fifteenth-Century Florentine Painter's Workshop. In Italian Renaissance Cities: Artistic Exchange and Cultural Translation, eds. S. Campbell and S. Milner, 38–74. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, A . 1998. Madonnas by Donatello and his Circle. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kecks, R . 1988. Madonna und Kind. Berlin, Germany: Mann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubersky-Piredda, S . 2003. Immagini devozionali nel Rinascimento fiorentino: produzione, commercio, prezzi. In The Art Market in Italy 15th–17th Centuries, eds. M. Fantoni, S. Matthews Grieco and L. Matthew, 115–126. Modena, Italy: Franco Cosimo Panini.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landau, D. and P. Parshall . 1994. The Renaissance Print. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithe-Jasper, M . 1986. Renaissance Master Bronzes from the Collection of the Kunsthistorisches Museum. Vienna, Austria: Scala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lydecker, K . 1987. The Domestic Setting of Art in Renaissance Florence. PhD dissertation, Johns Hopkins University.

  • Marquand, A . 1972. Andrea Della Robbia and his Atelier. London: Hacker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesbitt, A . 1957. The History and Technique of Lettering. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paoletti, J . 1998. Familiar Objects: Sculptural Types in the Collections of the Early Medici. In Looking at Italian Renaissance Sculpture, ed. S.B. McHam, 79–110. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasini, P.G . 1987. Matteo de’Pasti: Problems of Style and Chronology. In Italian Medals, ed. J.G. Pollard, 143–160. Washington, DC: National Gallery of Art.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piemontese, A . 1555. De Secreti del reverendo Donno Alessio Piemontese. Venice, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pincus, D, ed. 2001. Small Bronzes in the Renaissance. Washington, DC: National Gallery of Art.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, J.G . 1984–1985. Medaglie italiane del Rinascimento nel museo nazionale del Bargello, 3 vols. Florence, Italy: Studio per Edizione Scelte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope-Hennessy, J . 1965. Renaissance Bronzes from the Samuel H. Kress Collection. London: Phaidon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randolph, A . 2002. Renaissance Household Goddesses: Fertility, Politics, and the Gendering of the Spectatorship. In The Material Culture of Sex, Procreation, and Marriage in Pre-Modern Europe, eds. A. McClanan and K.R. Encarnacion, 163–189. New York: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, F . 1989. Le Gemme Antiche e le Origini della Placchetta. In Italian Plaquettes, ed. A. Luchs, 55–68. Washington, DC: The National Gallery of Art.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scher, S, ed. 1994. The Currency of Fame. New York: Frick Collection/Harry Abrams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scher, S, ed. 2000. Perspectives on the Renaissance Medal. New York: Garland and The American Numismatic Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, J . 1969. Visible Words: A Study of Inscriptions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, A . 1997. The Painter's Practice in Renaissance Tuscany. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P . 1991. The Italian Renaissance Interior 1400–1600. New York: Abrams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, M . 1981. The World of the Florentine Renaissance Artist, trans. A. Luchs. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, J . 1999. Renaissance Master Bronzes from the Ashmolean Museum, Oxford. Oxford, UK: Ashmolean Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, R . 1969. The Renaissance Discovery of Classical Antiquity. New York: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittkower, R. and M. Wittkower . 1963. Born Under Saturn. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Flaten, A. Reproducible media in the early fifteenth century, mostly Italian. Postmedieval 3, 46–62 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/pmed.2011.26

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/pmed.2011.26

Navigation