Skip to main content
Log in

Fear, Radical Democracy, and Ontological Methadone

  • Article
  • Published:
Polity

Abstract

Given recent social and political transformations as well as our cultural landscape's dominance by narratives of threat and victimization, it is understandable that fear has occupied an ever-expanding role in our lives. Although these instabilities and insecurities have inspired a resurgence of various explanatory and mollifying fundamentalisms, radical democrats suggest that the conditions of this “postmetaphysical” age might instead facilitate unprecedented commitments to democracy. As such, radical democrats welcome the very conditions of contingency that contemporary citizen-subjects tend to find so frightening. In attacking the drive towards fundamentalism that they identify in various ideologies from Islam through liberalism, radical democrats betray an inattention to the functional consolation they offer. If fundamentalisms are opiates, radical democrats offer a prescription for addiction treatment that few have any interest in taking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Thanks to George Davis, Nicholas Xenos, and an anonymous reviewer for Polity for their generous responses to an earlier draft of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lavin, C. Fear, Radical Democracy, and Ontological Methadone. Polity 38, 254–275 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.polity.2300045

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.polity.2300045

Keywords

Navigation