Abstract
In the last decade, the deliberative model of democracy has been offered to counter the prevalent conservative economistic tendencies of democratic theorizing. But the ideas of deliberation and rational persuasion are not newcomers on the stage of political philosophy, for they were central to the way classical rhetoricians understood politics. Against this background, this article examines the role economic and deliberative models of politics play in Hobbes's political philosophy. It argues that Hobbes chose to analogize these two models rather than to treat them as competing views of politics because he saw both the economy and deliberation as sites of manipulation and not as “consensus forming mechanisms.”
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I thank James Farr, Kaija Hupila, the participants of the Minnesota Theory Colloquium, and an anonymous reviewer at Polity for their helpful comments on this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ron, A. The “Market” and the “Forum” in Hobbes's Political Philosophy. Polity 38, 235–253 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.polity.2300043
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.polity.2300043