Skip to main content
Log in

Optimizing knowledge transfer by new employees in companies

  • Article
  • Published:
Knowledge Management Research & Practice

Abstract

Companies realize innovations by creating and implementing new knowledge. One possible source of innovative ideas are new employees. Based on an existing game-theoretic model the conditions of efficient knowledge transfer in a team are analyzed. Offering knowledge to a colleague cannot be controlled directly by the company due to information asymmetries. Thus the management has to provide incentives, which motivate the employees to act in favor of the company. The aim of this paper is to show what influences the propensity of the employees to engage in knowledge transfer and how the management can design the incentive structure for optimal transfer. Several factors are relevant, especially the individual costs of participating in the transfer. These consist mainly of the existing absorptive capacity and the working atmosphere. The model is at least partly generalized on more players. The relevance of the adequate team size is shown: too few or too many developers decrease the remaining company profit. A further result is that depending on the cost structure, perfect knowledge transfer is not always best for the profit of the company.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal A (2001) University-to-industry knowledge transfer: Literature review and unanswered questions. International Journal of Management Reviews 3 (4), 285–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley PJ and Carter MJ (2004) A formal analysis of knowledge combination in multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies 35 (5), 371–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen WM and Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1), 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czarnitzki D, Rammer C and Spielkamp A (2000) Interaktion zwischen Wissenschaft und Wirtschaft, ZEW-Dokumentation, no. 00-14.

  • Davenport TH and Prusak L (1998) Working Knowledge. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • David PA and Foray D (1995) Accessing and expanding the science and technology knowledge base. STI-Review 16, 13–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhanaraj C, Lyles MA, Steensma KH and Tihanyi L (2004) Managing tacit and explicit knowledge transfer in IJVs: the role of relational embeddedness and the impact on performance. Journal of International Business Studies 35 (5), 428–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egeln J, Gottschalk S, Rammer C and Spielkamp A (2003) Spinoff-Gründungen aus der öffentlichen Forschung in Deutschland. Nomos, Baden-Baden.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Council (2000) Presidency conclusions of 23rd and 24th of March 2000 [WWW document] http://ue.eu.int/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/ec/00100-r1.en0.htm (accessed 29 September 2006).

  • Gupta AK and Govindarajan V (2000) Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal 21 (4), 473–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckathorn DD (1996) The dynamics and dilemmas of collective action. American Sociological Review 61, 250–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane PJ, Salk JE and Lyles MA (2001) Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal 22 (12), 1139–1161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen K and Foss NJ (2003) New human resource management practices, complementarities and the impact on innovation performance. Cambridge Journal of Economics 27, 243–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malcomson JM (1984) Work incentives, hierarchy, and internal labor markets. Journal of Political Economy 92 (3), 486–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minbaeva D, Pedersen T, Björkman I, Fey CF and Park HJ (2003) MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and HRM. Journal of International Business Studies 34 (6), 586–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan G (1991) Images of Organization. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RR and Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I and Takeuchi H (1995) The Knowledge-Creating Company. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M (1966) The Tacit Dimension. Doubleday & Co., Garden City, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipton H, West MA, Dawson J, Birdi K and Patterson M (2006) HRM as a predictor of innovation. Human Resource Management Journal 16 (1), 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramaniam M and Venkatraman N (2001) Determinants of transnational product development capability: testing the influence of transferring and deploying tacit overseas knowledge. Strategic Management Journal 22 (4), 359–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful for useful comments by Ulrich Blum, Johannes, Stephan, and Birger Nerré. The usual disclaimer applies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sidonia C von Ledebur.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

von Ledebur, S. Optimizing knowledge transfer by new employees in companies. Knowl Manage Res Pract 5, 229–236 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500141

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500141

Keywords

Navigation