Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Knowledge management in SMEs: the case of Icelandic firms

  • Article
  • Published:
Knowledge Management Research & Practice

Abstract

This paper presents findings from a survey on knowledge management (KM) in small- and medium-sized firms (SMEs) in Iceland. It analyses the extent, strategy and effects of KM. The results indicate that more managers in SMEs need to consider the strengths and weaknesses of KM, and implement a formal KM strategy. Only 24% of Icelandic firms have a KM programme in place, and most of them have invested in simple information and communication technology technologies. The most common way of sharing tacit knowledge in Icelandic firms is encouraging face-to-face communication. The survey indicates that the benefits of KM programmes are quite positive even in SMEs. Accordingly, the research findings indicate that KM could improve organisational and managerial as well as financial aspects of SMEs. This research was carried out in only one country, and is based on a questionnaire. Its results should therefore be interpreted with care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alwert K and Hoffmann I (2003) Knowledge management tolls. In Knowledge Management: Concepts and Best Practices (MERTINS K, HEISIG P and VORBECK J, Eds), pp 114–150, Springer, Berlin.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Beijerse RP (2000) Knowledge management in small and medium-sized companies: knowledge management for entrepreneurs. Journal of Knowledge Management 4 (2), 162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg SR and Clarke T (1999) Intelligent organizations? In Global Management: Universal Theories and Local Realities (CLEGG S, IBARRA-COLADO E and BUEONO-RODRIQUEZ L, Eds), pp 177–201, Sage, London.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Corso M, Martini A, Paolucci E and Pellegrini L (2003) Knowledge management configurations in Italian small-to-medium enterprises. Integrated Manufacturing Systems 14 (1), 46–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daft RF (2004) Organization Theory and Design. South-Western, Mason.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edler J (2003) How German companies employ knowledge management. An OECD survey on usage, motivations and effects. In Knowledge Management. Concepts and Best Practice (MERTINS K, HEISIG P, and VORBECK J, Eds), pp 207–221, Berlin, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edvardsson IR (2004) Thekkingarstjórnun (Knowledge Management). University of Akureyri, Akureyri.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2006) The new SME definition: user guide and model declaration. [WWW document] http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/enterprise_policy/sme_definition/sme_user_guide.pdf (accessed 02 March 2006).

  • Gorman ME (2002) Types of knowledge and their roles in technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer 27 (3), 219–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen MT, Nohria N and Tierney T (1999) What's your strategy for managing knowledge? Harvard Business Review 77 (2), 106–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hlupic V, Pouloudi A and Rzevski G (2002) Towards an integrated approach to knowledge management: ‘hard’, ‘soft’ and ‘abstract’ issues. Knowledge and Process Management 9 (2), 90–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluge J, Wolfram S and Licht T (2001) Knowledge Unplugged. The McKinsey & Company Global Survey on Knowledge Management. Palgrave, Houndsmills.

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG Consulting (2000) Knowledge Management Research Report 2000. Annapolis/London.

  • Levy M, Loebbecke C and Powell P (2003) SMEs, co-opetion and knowledge sharing: the role of information systems. European Journal of Information Systems 12 (1), 38–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus LM (2001) Toward a theory of knowledge reuse: types of knowledge reuse situations and factors in reuse success. Journal of Management Information Systems 18 (1), 57–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matlay H (2000) Organisational learning in small learning organisations: an empirical overview. Education and Training 42 (4/5), 202–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdam R and Reid R (2001) SME and large organisation perception of knowledge management: comparisons and contrasts. Journal of Knowledge Management 5 (3), 231–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffett S, McAdam R and Parkinson S (2003) An empirical analysis of knowledge management applications. Journal of Knowledge Management 7 (3), 6–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Dell C, Hubert C, Lopez K, Odem P and Raybourn C (2003) Successful KM implementations: a study of best-practice organizations.In Handbook on Knowledge Management, Vol. 2 (HOLSAPPLE CW, Ed), pp 411–441, Springer, Berlin.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • O’Regan N and Ghobadian A (2004) Testing the homogeneity of SMEs: The impact of size on managerial and organisational processes. European Business Review 16 (1), 64–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pugh DS and Hickson DJ (1976) Organizational Structure in its Context: The Aston Program I. Saxon House, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford MW, McMullen P and Oswald S (2001) Examining the issue of size and the small business: a self organizing map approach. Journal of Business and Economic Studies 7 (2), 64–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salojärvi S, Furu P and Sveiby KE (2005) Knowledge management and growth in Finnish SMEs. Journal of Knowledge Management 9 (2), 103–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Iceland (2006) Number of employers divided by number of employees, regions and industry 1998–2003. [WWW document] http://www.hagstofa.is/?pageid=638&src=/temp/fyrirtaeki/fyrirtaeki.asp (accessed 2 March 2006).

  • Tsui E (2003) Tracking the role and evolution of commercial Knowledge Management software. In Handbook on knowledge management, Vol. 2 (HOLSAPPLE CW, Ed), pp 5–27, Springer, Berlin.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Walsham G (2001) Knowledge management: the benefits and limitations of computer systems. European Management Journal 19 (6), 599–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1998) What is knowledge management? A background to the World Development Report. Washington, DC, World Bank.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Business and Science, University of Akureyri, Nordurslod, Akureyri, Iceland

    Ingi R Edvardsson

Authors
  1. Ingi R Edvardsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ingi R Edvardsson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Edvardsson, I. Knowledge management in SMEs: the case of Icelandic firms. Knowl Manage Res Pract 4, 275–282 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500111

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500111

Keywords

Search

Navigation