Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Modelling and analysis of Canadian Forces strategic lift and pre-positioning options

  • Case-Oriented Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

This paper presents analysis of some of the strategic lift and pre-positioning issues within the context of rapid deployability to failed and failing states conducted for the Canadian Forces (CF). A simulation framework was developed to study the effectiveness of a variety of pre-positioning options. An aircraft loading optimization model based on a genetic annealing algorithm with a novel convex hull-based measure of effectiveness was also developed to analyse different strategic lift options. The model was used both to provide insights into the optimal mix of airlift capabilities and to conduct sensitivity analysis. Historical CF deployments provided a baseline performance measure against which several movement solutions were compared and contrasted. Analysis indicates that pre-positioning of equipment and supplies at various strategic locations and use of efficient mix of transport aircraft could be potential strategies for improvement of the CF's strategic lift capability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker SF, Morton DP, Rosenthal RE and Williams LM (2002). Optimizing military airlift. Opns Res 50(4): 582–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho H, Oh S and Choi D (1998). A new population-oriented simulated annealing technique based on local temperature concept. Electron Lett 34: 312–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis R (1992). Military afloat prepositioning: War time use and issues for the future. Report GAO/NSIAD-93-39, Government Accounting Office.

  • Dowsland K (1993). Some experiments with simulated annealing techniques for packing problems. Eur J Opl Res 68: 389–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fund for Peace (2005). Failed states index 2005. Foreign Policy 149, (July/August): 56–65.

  • Ghanmi A, Haque L, Kaluzny BL and Shaw RHAD (2008). GALAHAD: Genetic Annealing for Loading of Aircraft, a Heuristic Aiding Deployment. Technical report, Defence Research and Development Canada—Centre for Operational Research and Analysis (forthcoming)..

  • Granger J, Krishnamurthy A and Robinson SM (2001). Stochastic modeling of airlift operations. In: Proceedings of the 2001 Winter Simulation Conference. Monterey, California.

  • Guéret C, Jussien N, Lhomme O, Pavageau C and Prins C (2003). Loading aircraft for military operations. J Opl Res Soc 54: 458–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hypher RP (1980). Military airlift dynamics for laymen. ATGOR Staff Note 8/80, Operational Research Division, Trenton, Ontario.

  • Jakobs S (1996). On genetic algorithms for the packing of polygons. Eur J Opl Res 88: 165–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodi A, Martello S and Monaci M (2002). Two-dimensional packing problems: A survey. Eur J Opl Res 141: 241–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodi A, Martello S and Vigo D (1999). Heuristic and metaheuristic approaches for a class of two-dimensional bin packing problems. INFORMS J Comput 11: 345–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodi A, Martello S and Vigo D (2004). TSpack: A unified tabu search code for multi-dimensional bin packing problems. Ann Opns Res 131: 203–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng KYK (1992). A multicriteria optimization approach to aircraft loading. Opns Res 40(6): 1200–1205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pakhira MK (2003). A hybrid genetic algorithm using probabilistic selection. J Instit Eng (India) 84: 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltz E, Halliday JM and Bower A (2003). Speed and power: toward an expeditionary Army. Monograph Report MR 1755, RAND.

  • Rappoport HK, Levy LS, Golden BL and Toussaint KJ (1992). A planning heuristic for military airlift. Interfaces 22(3): 73–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szeto R and Cooper B (2005). The need for Canadian strategic lift. Studies in defence and foreign policy, The Fraser Institute.

  • Vick A, Orletsky D, Pirnie B and Jones S (2002). The Stryker Brigade combat team: rethinking strategic responsiveness and assessing deployment options. Monograph Report MR 1606, RAND.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Defence Research and Development Canada—Centre for Operational Research and Analysis, National Defence Headquarters, Ottawa, Canada

    A Ghanmi & R H A D Shaw

Authors
  1. A Ghanmi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R H A D Shaw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A Ghanmi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ghanmi, A., Shaw, R. Modelling and analysis of Canadian Forces strategic lift and pre-positioning options. J Oper Res Soc 59, 1591–1602 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602526

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602526

Keywords

Search

Navigation