Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating systems thinking in housing

  • Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

This paper describes and evaluates work carried out in the social housing context in the United Kingdom using a systems thinking approach called ‘lean systems’ (LS). The work, sponsored by the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, was designed to test whether LS could improve the efficiency of delivery of housing management and maintenance services. A pilot programme was developed in which three housing organizations used the approach in different service areas. The results indicate that LS can yield efficiency gains and improvements in service performance, customer satisfaction and staff morale—although securing and sustaining these results requires considerable organizational commitment. The LS approach is outlined, work in the pilots described and the results presented. A theoretical analysis seeks to locate LS in the spectrum of systems methodologies and to delimit its particular area of competence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackoff RL (1999). Ackoff's Best: His Classic Writings on Management. Wiley: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby WR (1956). An Introduction to Cybernetics. Methuen: London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beer S (1979). The Heart of Enterprise. Wiley: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman JC (2004). System Failure: Why Governments Must Learn to Think Differently. DEMOS: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland PB (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Wiley: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deming WE (1982). Out of Crisis. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deming WE and Walton M (1992). The Deming Management Method. Mercury Business Books: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershon P (2004). Releasing Resources to the Front line: Independent Review of Public-Sector Efficiency. HMSO: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC (2000). Systems Approaches to Management. Kluwer/Plenum: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC (2003). Systems Thinking: Creative Holism for Managers. Wiley: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC and Keys P (1984). Towards a system of systems methodologies. J Opl Res Soc 35: 473–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liker J (2003). The Toyota Way. McGraw-Hill: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J and Gill A (eds) (1997). Multimethodology—The Theory and Practice of Combining Management Science Methodologies. Wiley: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • NHC (2006). A Systematic Approach to Service Improvement—An Update: Evaluating the Sustainability of Systems Thinking in Housing. NHC: Webster's Ropery.

  • ODPM (2005). A Systematic Approach to Service Improvement: Evaluating Systems Thinking in Housing. ODPM Publications: Wetherby. Available on the web at: www.communities.gov.uk/index.asp?id=1165574.

  • Ohno T (1988). The Toyota Production System. Productivity Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seddon J (2003). Freedom from Command and Control: A Better Way to Make the Work Work. Vanguard Education Ltd: Buckingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge P (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Random House: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanguard Website: www.lean-service.com.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank staff and tenants at all three pilot organizations and, in particular, the in-house systems team members and sponsors. Thanks also to the Vanguard consultants involved and to members of the Evaluation Panel. Specific thanks go to Dawn Eastmead and John Bryant at the ODPM and Janis Bright for their considerable assistance in producing the ODPM report on which much of this paper is based. Ian Wright and Janis Bright (again) worked on the NHC update report which again is drawn on heavily in this paper. We gratefully recognize the assistance of the ODPM in commissioning and supporting the research described.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M C Jackson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jackson, M., Johnston, N. & Seddon, J. Evaluating systems thinking in housing. J Oper Res Soc 59, 186–197 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602521

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602521

Keywords

Navigation