Skip to main content
Log in

Linear programming solutions and distance functions under a constant returns to scale technology

  • Theoretical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the various relationships among the linear programming solutions of data envelopment analysis (DEA) models under a constant returns to scale technology. We derive the analytical relationships among the efficiency measures and the activity variables for four separate models: the input-based, the output-based, the hyperbolic, and the proportional distance functions. We apply our results in order to derive a test of consistency that can be used in assessing the returns to scale among differing DEA models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banker RD, Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Thrall RM and Zhu J (2004). Returns to scale in different DEA models. Eur J Opl Res 88: 345–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boussemart J-P, Briec W, Kerstens K and Poutineau JC (2003). Luenberger and Malmquist productivity indexes: Theoretical comparisons and empirical illustration. Bull Econ Res 55: 391–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briec W (1997). A graph type extension of Farrell technical efficiency measure. J Prod Anal 8: 95–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers RG, Chung Y and Färe R (1996). Benefit and distance functions. Journal of Econ Theory 70: 407–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers RG, Chung Y and Färe R (1998). Profit, directional distance functions, and Nerlovian efficiency. J Optim Theory Appl 98: 351–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debreu G (1951). The coefficient of resource utilization. Econometrica 19: 273–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S and Lovell CAK (1985). The Measurement of Efficiency of Production. Klüwer Academic Publisher: Boston.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S and Lovell CAK (1994). Production Frontiers. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S and Zaim O (2002). Hyperbolic efficiency and return to the dollar. Eur J Opl Res 136: 671–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell MJ (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc 120: 253–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans TC (1951). An analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. In: Koopmans TC (ed). Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation. Cowles Commission for Research in Economics, Monograph no 13. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.: New York, pp 33-97.

  • Luenberger DG (1995). Microeconomic Theory. McGraw-Hill: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shephard RW (1953). Cost and Production Functions. Princeton University Press: Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H Leleu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boussemart, JP., Briec, W. & Leleu, H. Linear programming solutions and distance functions under a constant returns to scale technology. J Oper Res Soc 60, 72–78 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602519

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602519

Keywords

Navigation