Skip to main content
Log in

Robust analysis on promotion duration for two competitive brands

  • Theoretical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

There are few studies that provide a useful tool or model to determine the promotion duration during the transition state of customers' switching between different brands. This implies that marketing managers usually decide the promotion duration based on their past experiences. The study integrates the Markov chain, entropy, and diffusion theory to model the problem and find a solution. Furthermore, the Taguchi method is also used to capture the uncertain parameters of the model to solve the problem. A numerical example is used to illustrate how the model determines optimal promotion duration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allenby GM (1989). A unified approach to identifying, estimating and testing demand structures with aggregate scanner data. Market Sci 8: 265–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass FM (1969). A new product growth for model consumer durables. Mngt Sci 15: 215–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks DR and Wiley EO (1988). Evolution as Entropy: Toward a Unified Theory of Biology. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlton P and Ehrenberg ASC (1976). An experiment in brand choice. J Market Res 13: 152–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ching WK, Ng MK, Wong KK and Altman E (2004). Customer lifetime value: Stochastic optimization approach. J Opl Res Soc 55: 860–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esteban-Bravo M, Múgica JM and Vidal-Sanz JM (2005). Optimal duration of magazine promotions. Market Lett 16: 99–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forchhammer S and Justesen J (1995). Entropy estimates for simple random fields. In: Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory. IEEE Press: Piscataway, NJ, pp. 249.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg D and Tirole J (2000). Customer poaching and brand switching. Rand J Econ 31: 634–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgiou AC (1999). Aspirations and priorities in a three phase approach of a nonhomogeneous Markov system. Eur J Opl Res 116: 565–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgiou AC and Vassiliou P-CG (1997). Cost models in nonhomogeneous Markov systems. Eur J Opl Res 100: 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier FS and Lieberman GJ (2005). Introduction to Operations Research. McGraw-Hill: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby J and Chestnut RW (1978). Brand Loyalty: Measurement and Management. John Wiley & Sons: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn BE and Louie TA (1990). Effects of retraction of price promotions on brand choice behavior for variety-seeking and last-purchase-loyal consumers. J Market Res 27: 279–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim KD, Han DN and Kim HT (2004). Optimization of experimental conditions based on the Taguchi robust design for the formation of nano-sized silver particles by chemical reduction method. J Chem Eng 104: 55–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim SY and Staelin R (1999). Manufacturer allowances and retailer pass-through rates in a competitive environment. Market Sci 18: 59–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massy WF, Montgomery DB and Morrison DG (1970). Stochastic Models of Buying Behavior. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsatsinis NF and Samaras AP (2000). Brand choice model selection based on consumers' multicriteria preferences and experts' knowledge. Comput Opns Res 27: 689–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehlmann A (1980). An approach to optimal recruitment and transition strategies for manpower systems using dynamic programming. J Opl Res Soc 31: 1009–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilakantan K and Raghavendra BG (2005). Control aspects in proportionality Markov manpower systems. Appl Math Model 29: 85–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver RL (1999). Whence consumer loyalty? J Marketing 63: 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price WL and Piskor WG (1972). The application of goal programming to manpower planning. INFOR 10: 221–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghavendra BG (1991). A bivariate model for Markov manpower planning systems. J Opl Res Soc 42: 565–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raju JS (1995). Theoretical models of sales promotions: Contributions, limitations, and a future research agenda. Eur J Opl Res 85: 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon CE and Weaver W (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press: Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taguchi G (1987). System of Experimental Design: Engineering Methods to Optimize Quality and Minimize Costs. White Plains: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vassiliou P-CG (1982). Asymptotic behavior of Markov systems. J Appl Probab 19: 851–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vassiliou P-CG (1984). Entropy as a measure of the experience distribution in a manpower system. J Opl Res Soc 35: 1021–1025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vassiliou P-CG and Symeonaki MA (1999). The perturbed nonhomogeneous Markov system. Linear Algebra Appl 289: 319–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vassiliou P-CG and Tsantas N (1984). Maintainability of structures in nonhomogeneous Markov systems under cyclic behavior and input control. SIAM J Appl Math 44: 1014–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C Lin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lin, C., Lin, YT. Robust analysis on promotion duration for two competitive brands. J Oper Res Soc 59, 548–555 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602387

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602387

Keywords

Navigation