Skip to main content
Log in

Mixed binary interval goal programming

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

This paper focuses on the mixed binary preferences decision problem associated with the use of penalty functions in goal programming. In this sense, a new formulation approach for interval goal programming is derived, which is more efficient than the model of Jones and Tamiz. In addition, to enhance the usefulness of the proposed model, binary variables subject to the environmental constraints are added. This leads to the model of binary interval goal programming. Finally, examples to illustrate these models are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chang CT (2000). An efficient linearization approach for mixed-integer problems. Eur J Opl Res 123: 652–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang CT (2004). On the mixed binary goal programming problems. App Math Comput 159: 759–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A and Cooper WW (1961). Management Model and Industrial Application of Linear Programming. Vol. 1, Wiley: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A and Collomb B (1972). Optimal economic stabilization policy: linear goal-interval programming models. Socio-Eco Plan Sci 6: 431–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ignizio JP (1985). Introduction to Linear Goal Programming. Sage: Beverly, Hills, CA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jones DF and Tamiz M (1995). Expanding the flexibility of goal programming via preference modelling techniques. Omega 23: 41–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee SM (1972). Goal Programming for Decision Analysis. Auerbach: Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero C (2001). Extended lexicographic goal programming: a unifying approach. Omega 29: 63–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrage (1994). LINDO Release 5.3. LINDO System, Inc.: Chicago, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamiz M, Jones DF and Romero C (1998). Goal programming for decision making: an overview of the current state-of-the-art. Eur J Opl Res 111: 567–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitoriano B and Romero C (1999). Extended interval goal programming. J Opl Res Soc 50: 1280–1283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ching-Ter Chang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chang, CT. Mixed binary interval goal programming. J Oper Res Soc 57, 469–473 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601999

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601999

Keywords

Navigation