Skip to main content
Log in

Allocating the gains from resource pooling with the Shapley Value

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

To make their cost structure more efficient, firms often pool their critical resources: small divisions of a large firm may negotiate a joint contract to benefit from volume discounts; or firms may outsource their call centres to an independent provider who is able to increase utilization by reducing variability since demand is now pooled. Since pooling demand reduces total joint costs, an immediate question is how the realized savings should be shared. We model the problem as a cooperative game and use the resulting allocation schemes to distribute the savings. One popular scheme is the Shapley Value, which always exists and, we show, represents each player's incremental value to the pool. When the pooled savings depend on the sum of each player's demand, we label the game coalition symmetric and propose, for those games, an algorithm that makes pseudo-polynomial the computation of the Shapley Value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Owen G (1995). Game Theory. Academic Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubey P, Mas-Colell A and Shubik M (1980). Efficiency properties of strategic market games: an axiomatic approach. J Econ Theory 22: 339–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornes R and Hartley R (2003). Aggregative public good games. NajEcon Working Paper Reviews 666156000000000063, www.najecon.org.

  • Corchón LC (1994). Comparative statics for aggregative games The strong concavity case. Math Soc Sci 28: 151–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hax AC and Candea D (1984). Production and Inventory Management. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myerson RB (1991). Game Theory, Analysis of Conflict. Harvard University Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shubik M (1962). Incentives, decentralized control, the assignment of joint costs and internal pricing. Mngt Sci 8: 325–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne MJ and Rubinstein A (1994). A Course in Game Theory. The MIT Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlechild SC and Owen G (1973). A simple expression for the Shapley Value in a special case. Mngt Sci 20: 370–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G Reinhardt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reinhardt, G., Dada, M. Allocating the gains from resource pooling with the Shapley Value. J Oper Res Soc 56, 997–1000 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601929

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601929

Keywords

Navigation