Skip to main content
Log in

‘Good enough’ performance measurement: a trade-off between activity and action

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

Performance measurement systems along the lines of the EFQM and the balanced scorecard have developed rapidly in recent years, and now occupy much management time and effort. There is limited evidence that performance improvement has received proportionate attention. Six organisations selected for their success were studied using a grounded theory approach based on interviews with management accountants and operations managers in each of the organisations. It is clear that they are all making strenuous efforts to use their performance measurement systems but with a focus on the ‘good enough’ rather than the detail. This gave managers in these organisations the time and space to concentrate on the use of performance measures on forward looking relevance, understanding and action, rather than retrospective and detailed control. This approach was promoted by senior managers and was based on their ability to see the business in simple terms and their understanding of the key drivers of business performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R Johnston.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnston, R., Brignall, S. & Fitzgerald, L. ‘Good enough’ performance measurement: a trade-off between activity and action. J Oper Res Soc 53, 256–262 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601217

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601217

Keywords

Navigation