Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of greedy, myopic and less-greedy heuristics for the single machine, total tardiness problem

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

Simple, yet highly effective modifications to the net benefit of relocation (NBR) heuristic of Holsenback and Russell provide significant improvements in solution quality without any increase in computational effort by tempering the greedy nature of the original NBR heuristic. Two lemmas reduce the size of the search while adhering to optimality conditions. Experimentation compares the modified NBR heuristic (M-NBR) with the two leading heuristics of the literature. Testing on 25, 50 and 100-job problems over a wide range of due dates and tardiness factors shows the M-NBR algorithm to be the best single-pass heuristic to date. We show that a composite heuristic, employing the better of the M-NBR and another leading heuristic solution, consistently produces near-optimal solutions with negligible CPU requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R M Russell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Russell, R., Holsenback, J. Evaluation of greedy, myopic and less-greedy heuristics for the single machine, total tardiness problem. J Oper Res Soc 48, 640–646 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600400

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600400

Keywords

Navigation