Abstract
Government and industry initiatives to stimulate the diffusion of high-performance broadband telecommunications links have given a fresh impetus to debates over the social and economic implications of the growing use of the Internet and other information and communication technologies (ICTs). This paper analyses how outcomes tied to ICT innovation are shaped by choices about whether and how to use, or not use, the technology to reconfigure access to people, services, information and technologies in ways that significantly change the communicative power of individuals, communities, organisations, nations and regions. It explains why these outcomes are not predetermined by the technology, but unfold over time through the complex interplay among many actors, in many arenas. A framework is presented to assist in addressing the issue of digital divides and other areas of research, policy and practice affected by the design and use of broadband Internet and related ICTs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This paper draws on Dutton et al. (2003a), a discussion paper based on the Broadband Divides Forum convened in March 2003 by the Oxford Internet Institute, in collaboration with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Syracuse and Tufts Universities. The authors are indebted to the Forum's participants, whose wide range of knowledge and practical expertise in business, industry, government, public agencies and research form the core of the ideas in the paper. However, they apologise for not having the space here to acknowledge individual contributions (for more detailed reports on the Forum's discussions and background material see Dutton et al., 2003a, 2003b).
References
Bell, D. (1999 [1973]). The Coming of the Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting, New York: Basic Books.
Blumenthal, M.S. and Clark, D.D. (2001). Rethinking the Design of the Internet: The end to end arguments vs the brave new world, ACM Transactions on Internet Technology 1(1): 70–109.
Bruce, R. (2003). Closing the Digital Divide: Perspectives on initiatives to encourage investment and innovation, In W.H. Dutton, V. Nash and M. Peltu, (eds.) Broadband Divides: Position Papers for OII International Policy Forum, Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute, pp. 10–14 (www.oii.ox.ac.uk).
Bruce, R. and Marriott, A. (2002). The Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Telecommunications Sector, Discussion Paper Prepared for the Office of General Counsel, World Bank, October (www.itu.int/itu-d/treg/events/seminars/2002/gsr/documents/12-bruce_document.pdf).
Business Week (2003). WiFi special supplement, 28 April (www:businessweek.com/magazine/toc/03_17/b3830magazine.htm).
Cabinet Office (1999). Modernising Government, Cm 4310, London: The Stationery Office.
Chen, W. and Wellman, B. (2003). Digital Divides and Digital Dividends: Comparing socioeconomic, gender, life stage, and rural–urban internet access and use in eight countries, Centre for Urban and Community Studies, University of Toronto, Toronto: NetLab.
Chileshe, P., Dando, S., Miller, P. and Osman, A. (2002). Investing in Broadband: Perspectives on the political economy of broadband Investment in the UK, Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute.
Clark, D., Gillett, S., Lehr, W., Sirbu, M. and Fountain, J. (2002). Local Government Stimulation of Broadband: Effectiveness, e-government and economic development, A White Paper Prepared from a Proposal to the US National Science Foundation Cambridge, MA: MIT Program on Internet & Telecommunications Convergence, (http://itc.mit.edu/itel/pp.html).
Crandall, R.W. and Jackson, C.L. (2001). The $500 Billion Opportunity: The potential economic benefit of widespread diffusion of broadband internet access, Washington, DC: Criterion Economics.
CSTB (2002). Bringing Home the Bits, Report of Committee on Broadband Last Mile Technology, Computer Science and Telecommunications Board Committee (CSTB), Washington, DC: National Academies Press, (www.cstb.org).
Devins, D., Darlow, A., Burden, T. and Petrie, A. (2003). Connecting Communities to the Internet: Evaluation of the wired up communities programme (2000–2002), Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds: Policy Research Institute, (www.dfes.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/rr389.pdf).
DTI (2000). Closing the Digital Divide: Information and communication technologies in deprived areas, London: Department of Trade and Industry (DTI).
Dutton, W.H. (1992). The Ecology of Games Shaping Telecommunications Policy, Communication Theory, 2: 303–328.
Dutton, W.H. (1999). Society on the Line: information politics in the digital age, Oxford: University Press.
Dutton, W.H. (2003). Historical–Cultural Contexts of Broadband Policy and Practice, in W.H. Dutton, V. Nash and M. Peltu (eds.) Broadband Divides: Position papers for OII international policy forum, Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute, pp. 20–21 (www.oii.ox.ac.uk).
Dutton, W.H., Gillett, S.E., McKnight, L.W. and Peltu, M. (2003a). Broadband Internet: The power to reconfigure access, Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute, (www.oii.ox.ac.uk).
Dutton, W.H., Nash, V. and Peltu, M. (eds.) (2003b). Broadband Divides: Position Papers for OII International Policy Forum, Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute, (www.oii.ox.ac.uk).
Foster, I. and Kesselman, C. (eds.) (1998). The Grid: Blueprint for a new computing infrastructure, San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Gillett, S.E. (2001). Berkshire Connect: A Case Study of Demand Aggregation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Program on Internet & Telecommunications Convergence, (http://itc.mit.edu/itel/pp.html).
Gillett, S. (2003). In Praise of Policy Diversity, In W.H. Dutton, V. Nash and M. Peltu (eds.) Broadband Divides: Position papers for OII International Policy Forum, Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute, pp. 22–25. [www.oii.ox.ac.uk(and http://itc.mit.edu/itel/docs/2003/localgovbrbd.pdf for an updated version)].
Jackson, C.C. (2003). Internet Bandwidth in the Broadband Social Divide, In W.H. Dutton, V. Nash and M. Peltu (eds.) Broadband Divides: Position papers for OII International Policy Forum, Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute, pp. 26–27 (www.oii.ox.ac.uk).
Mayor of London (2002). Broadband: Connecting to London's future, London: Greater London Authority, (www.london.gov.uk/approot/gla/publications/e-london/broadband_nov02.pdf).
McKnight, L. (2003). The Nomadicity Divide: Policy for wireless grids, in W.H. Dutton, V. Nash and M. Peltu (eds.) Broadband Divides: Position papers for OII International Policy Forum, Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute, pp. 31–34 (www.oii.ox.ac.uk).
McKnight, L.W., Anius, D. and Uzuner, O. (2002). Virtual Markets in Wireless Grids: Peering policy prospects, Presented at Conference TPRC 2002, (www.tprc.org).
Nelson, M. and Feldman, S. (2003). The Grid and Public Policy, in W.H. Dutton, V. Nash M. Peltu (eds.) Broadband Divides: Position Papers for OII International Policy Forum, Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute, pp. 39–42 (www.oii.ox.ac.uk).
Osorio, C. (2003). A Look at the Broadband Significance Divide, in W.H. Dutton, V. Nash and M. Peltu (eds.) Broadband Divides: Position papers for OII International Policy Forum, Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute, pp. 42–45 (www.oii.ox.ac.uk).
Paltridge, S. (2003). The Social Divide: The deployment and adoption of broadband within nations and across nations and regions? in W.H. Dutton, V. Nash and M. Peltu (eds.) Broadband Divides: Position papers for OII International Policy Forum, Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute, pp. 45–50 (www.oii.ox.ac.uk).
Socitm (2002). Broadband in Local Government: A snapshot in 2002, Northampton, UK: Society of Information Technology Managers (Socitm) Insight.
Williams, R. and Edge, D. (1996). The Social Shaping of Technology, in W.H. Dutton (ed.) Information and Communication Technologies – Visions and Realities, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 53–67.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dutton, W., Gillett, S., McKnight, L. et al. Bridging broadband Internet divides: reconfiguring access to enhance communicative power. J Inf Technol 19, 28–38 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000007
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000007