Skip to main content
Log in

Something old, something new: Eastness in European Union enlargement

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of International Relations and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article investigates how the notion of Eastness informs the discourse of European Union (EU) enlargement. Eastness here refers to an inscription of identity — a process by which places, events and societal developments are endowed with a likeness to the ‘East’ as distinct from ‘Europe’. Drawing examples from academic scholarship on EU enlargement, the article outlines how the inscription of Eastness functions in the enlargement discourse, and how its functions have changed since the end of the Cold War. I argue that the erstwhile East (of Europe) as a territorially defined periphery of Europe has been layered into multiple peripheries with varying degrees of Eastness. One might say that parts of the former East have become less East-like and more Europe-like, while others are still endowed with a high degree of Eastness. At the same time, European identity is still constructed in terms of the East. Economic, political and social developments in East-Central Europe are still conceived in terms of proximity to, or distance from, an idealized Europe or Europeanness. The situation is neither one of a static and monolithic othering nor of the dissolution of Eastness. The East is best understood not as a location but as a tendency, one always inscribed in degrees, shades and flavours. The challenge is not to unearth a core meaning or location of the East, but the specific and often unremarkable processes by which Eastness is inscribed onto places.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In other words, Europe and the Eastness are performatively constructed. See Kuus (2007) on a performative construction of political identity.

  2. Discourse is understood here as a set of assumptions, claims and modes of analysis that enable and constrain speech and practice. The EU enlargement discourse is therefore not the sum of what is said about EU enlargement, but the tacit grammars within which enlargement is problematized as a particular kind of process requiring particular kinds of solutions. The core concern of discursive analyses is not with the specific content of what is said or written about geopolitics. Their concern is rather with the rules that make particular political practices legible and legitimate, while making other practices illogical, unfeasible or illegitimate. This paper thus does not seek to reveal deep hidden meanings of political practice — what individual decision-makers ‘truly’ think or what beliefs are shared among the population. Instead, it highlights persistent assumptions, themes and tropes that both enable and constrain political debate and political practice. These assumptions often remain unnoticed, not because they are hidden but because they are taken for granted. Discourses are not discernible in terms of their core substance, but in terms of their effects (of normalizing particular conceptual and political approaches to complex social issues). They are not a property of the speaker but of the particular political arena. In the context of this paper, academics do not put forth discourses; they operate within discourses. I therefore do not attempt a comprehensive review of identity or security claims in Central Europe or the roots of these claims. Instead, I elucidate the geographical and territorial assumptions that enable these claims. Discourses do not enforce a complete agreement or unity of methodology. They operate through fractured, flexible and contingent practices that nonetheless form a certain regulation. They channel disagreement into a framework within which the act of disagreement obscures actors’ shared allegiance to categories that contain their disagreements. To speak of the EU enlargement discourse, then, is not to deny debate but to foreground the arguments and modes of analysis that encase the debate; the assumptions and arguments in relation to which other arguments have to be positioned. Discourses are not contained within state institutions or projected from these institutions. They are produced in many spheres of the civil society, including education, entertainment and the media. Their power lies in their dispersed and routine ordinariness. My analysis focuses on the elite governmental and academic discourse because this is the discourse within which public policy is proposed and implemented. To focus on elite discourse is not to imply that everyone internalizes that discourse, but to concentrate on these modes of analysis that frame public debate and cannot be dismissed as ignorant or illegitimate. For further methodological discussions of discourse, see O'Tuathail and Agnew (1992), Campbell (1998), Gusterson (1999), Weldes et al. (1999), and Wæver (2002).

  3. Russia is a good example that a place that is ‘eastern’ is not necessarily cast as weak in the sense of traditional power politics. Russia's ‘strength’ becomes in this context an additional sign of its otherness as it is evoked to distance Russia's power-political position from the supposedly more nuanced and ‘postmodern’ position of the EU. I thank an anonymous reviewer for this insight.

  4. Actors in the region have an incentive to keep the region ‘insecure’. Due to the prominence of security in the EU enlargement discourse, engagement with East-Central Europe is premised on it being insecure. Browning and Joenniemi (2004) note in the context of the Baltic Sea region that the scaling down of the security rhetoric in the region may make international co-operation more difficult as politicians are less inclined to channel funds into a region that is no longer insecure. The dependency of western engagement with East-Central Europe on security was also notable in aid policies as aid packages were channelled to states that were considered security risks to the west (Weel 2001; Danjoux 2002).

References

  • Aalto, Pami (2002) ‘A European Geopolitical Subject in the Making: EU, Russia and the Kaliningrad Question’, Geopolitics 7(3): 143–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agnew, John A. (2001) ‘How Many Europes?: The European Union, Eastward Enlargement and Uneven Development’, European Urban and Regional Studies 8(1): 29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amato, Giuliano and Judy Batt (1999) ‘The Long-term Implications of EU Enlargement: The Nature of the New Border’, Robert Schuman Centre Policy Paper 99/6, European University Institute, Florence.

  • Beissinger, Mark R. and Craig Young, eds. (2002) Beyond State Crisis: Postcolonial Africa and Post-Soviet Eurasia in Comparative Perspective, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, Eiki (2002) Eesti tähendused, piirid ja kontekstid, Tartu: Tartu Ulikooli Kirjastus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bialasiewicz, Luiza and John O’Loughlin (2002) ‘Re-ordering Europe's Eastern Frontier: Galician Identities and Political Cartographies on the Polish-Ukrainian Border’, in David H. Kaplan and Jouni Häkli, eds, Boundaries and Place: European Borderlands in Geographical Context, 217–238, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böröcz, Joszef (2000) ‘The Fox and the Raven: The European Union and Hungary Renegotiate the Margins of “Europe”’, Comparative Studies in Society and History 4: 847–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browning, Chris S. (2003a) ‘The Region-building Approach Revisited: The Continued Othering of Russia in Discourses of Region-building in the European North’, Geopolitics 8(1): 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browning, Chris S. (2003b) ‘The Internal/External Security Paradox and the Reconstruction of Boundaries in the Baltic: The Case of Kaliningrad’, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 28(3): 545–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browning, Chris S. (2003c) ‘Complementarities and Differences in EU and US Policies in Northern Europe’, Journal of International Relations and Development 6(1): 23–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, Chris S. and Pertti Joenniemi (2003) ‘The European Union's Two Dimensions: The Northern and the Eastern’, Security Dialogue 34(4): 463–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browning, Chris S. and Pertti Joenniemi (2004) ‘Regionality Beyond Security? The Baltic Sea Region After Enlargement’, Cooperation and Conflict 39(3): 233–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker, Rogers (1998) ‘Myths and Misconceptions in the Study of Nationalism’, in John A. Hall, ed., The State of the Nation: Ernest Gellner and the Theory of Nationalism, 272–306, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bruszt, Lazlo and David Stark (2003) ‘Who Counts? Supranational Norms and Societal Needs’, East European Politics and Societies 17(1): 74–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, David (1998) Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity, 2nd revised edition, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Stephen F. (2001) Failed Crusade: America and the Tragedy of Post-communist Russia, New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czepeli, Gyorgy, Antal Orkeny and Kim Lane Scheppele (1996) ‘Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome in Social Science in Eastern Europe’, Social Research 63(2): 486–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danjoux, Olivier (2002) Reframing Citizenship in the Baltic Republics, Lund Political Studies 122, Lund: Department of Political Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Sarto, Raffaella A. and Tobias Schuhmacher (2005) ‘From EMP to ENP: What's at Stake with the European Neighbourhood Policy towards the Southern Mediterranean?’, European Foreign Affairs Review 10(1): 17–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diez, Thomas (1999) ‘Constructing Threat, Constructing Political Order: On the Legitimisation of an Economic Community in Western Europe’, Journal of International Relations and Development 2(1): 29–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diez, Thomas (2004) ‘Europe's Others and the Return of Geopolitics’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs 17(2): 319–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, Elizabeth C. (2005) ‘Standards and Person-making in East-Central Europe’, in Aihwa Ong and Stephen Collier, eds, Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems, 173–193, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel-DiMauro, Salvatore, ed. (2006) The European's Burden: Global Imperialism in EU Expansion, Brussels: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esterházy, Péter (2003) ‘How Big is the European Dwarf?’, Süddeutsche Zeitung (11 June), reprinted in Daniel Levy, Max Pensky and John Torpey, eds (2005) Old Europe, New Europe, Core Europe: Transatlantic Relations After the Iraq War, 74–79, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garton Ash, Timothy (1999) History of the Present: Essays, Sketches and Despatches from Europe in the 1990s, London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabbe, Heather (2000) ‘The Sharp Edges of Europe: Extending Schengen Eastwards’, International Affairs 76(3): 519–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grudzinski, Przemyslav and Ham van Peter (1999) A Critical Approach to European Security, London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gusterson, Hugh (1999) ‘Missing the End of the Cold War in International Security’, in Jutta Weldes, Mark Laffey, Hugh Gusterson and Raymond Duvall, eds, Cultures of Insecurity: States, Communities and the Production of Danger, 319–345, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harloe, Michael (1996) ‘Introduction: Cities After Socialism’, in Michael Harloe, Ivan Szelenyi and Gregory Andrusz, eds, Cities after Socialism: Urban and Regional Change and Conflict in Post-socialist Societies, 1–16, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, Robert M. (1999) Blueprints for a House Divided: The Constitutional Logic of the Yugoslav Conflicts, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hörschelmann, Kathrin (2001) ‘Breaking Ground — Marginality and Resistance in (Post) Unification Germany’, Political Geography 20: 981–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hörschelmann, Kathrin (2002) ‘Media Networks in Transition: The Politics of Cultural Production in Post-Unification Germany’, Social & Cultural Geography 3(2): 155–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilves, Toomas Hendrik (2003) ‘The Double Enlargement and the Great Wall of Europe’, in Anders Kasekamp, ed., Estonian Foreign Policy Yearbook 2003, 9–20, Tallinn: Estonian Foreign Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingrao, Charles (1999) ‘Understanding Ethnic Conflict in Central Europe: An Historical Perspective’, Nationalities Papers 27(2): 291–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joenniemi, Pertti (2003) ‘Can Europe Be Told from the North: Tapping into the EU's Northern Dimension’, in Frank Möller and Samu Pehkonen, eds, Encountering the North: Cultural Geography, International Relations and Northern Landscapes, 221–261, Ashgate: Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krupnick, Charles, ed. (2003) Almost NATO: Partners and Players in Central and Eastern European Security, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurti, Lazlo (1996) ‘Homecoming: Affairs of Anthropologists in and of Eastern Europe’, Anthropology Today 12(3): 11–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuus, Merje (2002) ‘Toward Co-operative Security? International Integration and the Construction of Security in Estonia’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies 31(2): 297–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuus, Merje (2004) ‘Europe's Eastern Enlargement and the Re-inscription of Otherness in East-Central Europe’, Progress in Human Geography 18(4): 472–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuus, Merje (2007) ‘Ubiquitous Identities and Elusive Subjects: Puzzles from Central Europe’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 32(1): 90–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagerspetz, Mikko (2003) ‘How Many Nordic Countries? Possibilities and Limits of Geopolitical Identity Construction’, Cooperation and Conflict 38(1): 49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, Richard N. and Thomas Risse-Kappen, eds. (1995) International Relations Theory and the End of the Cold War, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linden, Ronald, ed. (2002) Norms and Nannies: The Impact of International Organizations on the Central and East European States, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linz, Juan J. and Alfred Stepan (1996) Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America and Post-communist Europe, Baltimore, MA and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melegh, Attila (2006) On the East-West Slope: Globalization, Nationalism, Racism and Discourses on Eastern Europe, Budapest and New York: Central European University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moisio, Sami (2002) ‘EU Eligibility, Central Europe and the Invention of Applicant State Narrative’, Geopolitics 7(3): 89–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, Iver B. (1998) ‘European Identity, EU Expansion, and the Integration/Exclusion Nexus’, Alternatives: Social Transformation and Humane Governance 23(3): 397–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, Iver B. (1999a) The Uses of the Other: ‘The East’ in European Identity Formation, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, Iver B. (1999b) ‘Representation and State Action: The Case of Russia's Place in Europe’, Journal of International Relations and Development 2(3): 263–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, Iver B. (2003) ‘Forgetting the Central Europe of the 1980s’, in Christopher Lord, ed., Central Europe: Core or Periphery?, 207–218, Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Rebecca (2003) ‘Europe “Whole and Free”: NATO's Political Mission in the 21st Century’, NATO EAPC Research Fellowship Final Report, NATO, Office of Information and Press, Brussels.

  • O’Tuathail, Gearoid and John J. Agnew (1992) ‘Geopolitics and Discourse: Practical Geopolitical Reasoning in American Foreign Policy?’, Political Geography 11: 190–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, Patrick.H. (2003) ‘On the Edge of Reason: The boundaries of Balkanism in Slovenian, Austrian, and Italian Discourse’, Slavic Review 62(1): 110–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perron, Catherine (2003) ‘Local Political Elites Perceptions of the EU’, in Jacques Rupnik and Jan Zielonka, eds, The Road to the European Union; Vol. 1: The Czech and Slovak Republics, 199–219, Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietz, William (1988) ‘The “Post-colonialism” of Cold War discourse’, Social Text 19/20 (Autumn): 55–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razsa, Maple and Nicole Lindstrom (2004) ‘Balkan is Beautiful: Balkanism in the Political Discourse of Tudman's Croatia’, East European Politics and Societies 18(4): 628–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, Frank (2001) ‘International Socialization in the New Europe: Rational Action in an Institutional Environment’, European Journal of International Relations 6(1): 109–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, David (1997) ‘Geopolitical Imaginations Across the North-South Divide: Issues of Difference, Development and Power’, Political Geography 16(8): 631–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Adrian (2002) ‘Imagining Geographies of the “New Europe”: Geo-economic Power and the New European Architecture of Integration’, Political Geography 21(5): 647–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Karen E. (2005) ‘The Outsiders: The European Neighbourhood Policy’, International Affairs 81(4): 757–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smoke, Richard, ed. (1996) Perceptions of Security: Public Opinion and Expert Assessments in Europe's New Democracies, Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefanovicz, Janusz (1996) ‘Poland’, in Richard Smoke, ed., Perceptions of Security: Public Opinion and Expert Assessments in Europe's New Democracies, 107–128, Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todorova, Maria (1997) Imagining the Balkans, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todorova, Maria (2003) ‘Isn’t Central Europe Dead?’, in Christopher Lord, ed., Central Europe: Core or Periphery?, 219–231, Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velikonja, Mitja (2005) Eurosis: A Critique of New Eurocentrism, Ljubljana: Mirovni Institut, available at http://mediawatch.mirovni-institut.si/eng/mw17.htm (13 June 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdery, Katherine (1997) ‘The “New” Eastern Europe in an Anthropology of Europe’, American Anthropologist 99(4): 715–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdery, Katherine (2002) ‘Whither Postsocialism?’, in Chris M. Hann, ed., Postsocialism: Ideals, Ideologies and Practices in Eurasia, 15–22, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weel, Janine (2001) Collision and Collusion: The Strange Case of Western Aid to Eastern Europe, New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Hayden (2000) ‘The Discourse of Europe and the Search for a European Identity’, in Bo Stråth, ed., Europe and the Other and Europe as the Other, 67–85, Brussels: I.E.-Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, Larry (1994) Inventing Eastern Europe: The Map of Civilization in the Mind of the Enlightenment, Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weldes, Jutta, Mark Laffey, Hugh Gusterson and Raymond Duvall (1999) ‘Introduction: Constructing Insecurity’, in Jutta Weldes, Mark Laffey, Hugh Gusterson and Raymond Duvall, eds, Cultures of Insecurity: States, Communities and the Production of Danger, 1–33, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wæver, Ole (1997) ‘Imperial Metaphors: Emerging European Analogies to Pre-Nation-State Imperial Systems’, in Ola Tunander, Pavel K. Baev and Victoria Ingrid Einagel, eds, Geopolitics in Post-Wall Europe: Security, Territory and Identity, 59–93, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wæver, Ole (2000) ‘The EU as Security Actor: Reflections from a Pessimistic Constructivist on Post-Sovereign Security Orders’, in Morten Kelstrup and Michael C. Williams, eds, International Relations Theory and the Politics of European Integration: Power, Security and Community, 250–294, London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wæver, Ole (2002) ‘Identity, Communities and Foreign Policy: Discourse Analysis as Foreign Policy Theory’, in Lene Hansen and Ole Wæver, eds, European Integration and National Identity: The Challenge of the Nordic States, 20–49, London, and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarycki, Tomasz (2004) ‘Uses of Russia: The Role of Russia is the Modern Polish National Identity’, East European Politics and Societies 18(4): 595–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zielonka, Jan (2006) Europe as Empire: The Nature of the Enlarged European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Gregory Feldman, the Editors, and the four reviewers of this journal for their detailed and constructive comments on earlier versions of the article. Research for the article was funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. The usual disclaimers apply.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuus, M. Something old, something new: Eastness in European Union enlargement. J Int Relat Dev 10, 150–167 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jird.1800121

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jird.1800121

Keywords

Navigation