Abstract
This research investigates hypotheses about differences between Chinese and American managers in the configuration of trusting relationships within their professional networks. Consistent with hypotheses about Chinese familial collectivism, an egocentric network survey found that affect- and cognition-based trust were more intertwined for Chinese than for American managers. In addition, the effect of economic exchange on affect-based trust was more positive for Chinese than for Americans, whereas the effect of friendship was more positive for Americans than for Chinese. Finally, the extent to which a given relationship was highly embedded in ties to third parties increased cognition-based trust for Chinese but not for Americans. Implications for cultural research and international business practices are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In the literature on collectivism, researchers distinguished between group collectivism and relational collectivism (e.g., Brewer & Chen, 2007). Group collectivism refers to the extent to which people's orientation toward self and others is based on depersonalized relationships with others by virtue of common membership in a symbolic group. By contrast, relational collectivism refers to the extent to which people's orientation toward self and others is based on personalized relationships with particular close others and the network connections that extend from these specific dyadic relationships. We see familial collectivism as a form of relational collectivism, as it derives from highly personal relationships with family members.
By norms we are referring to descriptive norms (i.e., common practices) as opposed to injunctive norms (i.e., what one ought to do).
We also collected additional data in another MBA class (N=56) using the full trust scales from McAllister (1995). The objective is to demonstrate that our two item trust scales are highly correlated with the full trust scales. For the American subsample (N=45), Cronbach's alphas for the full cognition- and affect-based trust scales were 0.89 and 0.96, respectively. The two-item scales used in the present research correlated highly with the full trust scales: 0.94 for cognition-based trust (p<0.01) and 0.97 for affect-based trust (p<0.01). Similarly, for the Asian subsample (N=11) Cronbach's alphas for the full cognition- and affect-based trust scales were 0.91 and 0.97, respectively. The two-item scales used in the present research correlated highly with the full trust scales: 0.96 for cognition-based trust (p<0.01) and 0.98 for affect-based trust (p<0.01). We believe this should provide even more convincing evidence that our two-item scales adequately tap the trust constructs.
Multilevel analysis is required for valid statistical inference when the units of observation are nested within clusters. In our case, trust measures were clustered within networks because each participant reported their level of trust in multiple members within his or her network. Multilevel confirmatory factor analysis handles the nested structure of our data by allowing for the investigation of both within- and between-network variance in the observed trust measures.
The negative association suggests that Americans not only experience tension in mixing affective closeness with economic pursuits, but also actively reduce affective closeness with those on whom they depend for economic resources. It is plausible that certain kinds of economic dependence (e.g., receiving a lucrative contract from a business associate) may be accompanied by a distancing of personal interaction so as to maintain perceptions of impartiality. It is an interesting question whether this comes primarily from subjective norms or whether it is driven in some cases by the pressure of American legal institutions.
Although this way of inferring kin-like ties does not directly capture kinship related by blood, genetic kinship is less the issue than whether they have been in familial roles. In Chinese culture, relationships that were forged when one was young and continued well into adulthood are often described in family-like terms (e.g., a mentor/teacher, or an old neighbor who watches one grow up). Thus our method of capturing kin-like relationships includes not only relationship by blood, but also other important relationships that have kin-like qualities.
We also computed kin-like ties using different cut-off ages (15 and 18 year old) and found similar results.
We note that kin-like ties are positively associated with affect-based trust (kin-like peer: b=0.24, p<0.01; kin-like mentor: b=0.17, p<0.01) but not cognition-based trust (kin-like peer: b=−0.06, p<0.05; kin-like mentor: b=−0.04, p=0.44). Also, kin-like alters are unlikely to be of a difference race (kin-like peer: b=−0.41, p<0.01; kin-like mentor: b=−0.50, p<0.01). These findings are consistent with our assumptions that these variables indicate kin.
To further explore the possibility that our findings were not solely the result of institutional factors, we conducted additional analyses on our US data by using Asian participants who were excluded in prior analyses. Specifically, we conducted the same analyses as in our current study but compared Asian with non-Asian participants within the US sample. We found trends in our results that are consistent with our hypotheses. In particular, the two types of trust appeared more intertwined in Asian than in non-Asian networks. The effects we hypothesized regarding economic dependence ties, friendship ties, and embeddedness, though not significant owing to the small Asian sample (N=29), are all in the expected directions. These results suggest that our findings could indeed be driven by differences in traditional cultural norms and values.
References
Bearman, P. 1997. Generalized exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 102 (5): 1383–1415.
Bond, M. H., & Hwang, K. K. 1986. The social psychology of Chinese people. In M. H. Bond (Eds), The psychology of the Chinese people: 213–266. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Brewer, M., & Chen, Y. 2007. Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism. Psychological Review, 114 (1): 133–151.
Burt, R. S. 2005. Brokerage and closure. New York: Oxford University Press.
Butler, J. K. 1991. Toward understanding and measuring condition of trust: Evolution of a condition of trust inventory. Journal of Management, 17 (3): 643–663.
Chen, C., Chen, Y., & Xin, 2004. Guanxi practices and trust in management: A procedural justice perspective. Organization Science, 15 (2): 200–209.
Chen, X. P., & Chen, C. C. 2004. On the intricacies of the Chinese guanxi: A process model of guanxi development. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21 (3): 305–324.
Chow, I. H., & Ng, I. 2004. The characteristics of Chinese personal ties (guanxi): Evidence from Hong Kong. Organization Studies, 25 (7): 1075–1093.
Chua, R. Y. J., Ingram, P., & Morris, M. 2008. From the head and the heart: Locating cognition- and affect-based trust in managers' professional networks. Academy of Management Journal, 51 (3): 436–452.
Coleman, J. 1990. Foundation of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cook, J., & Wall, T. 1980. New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need nonfulfillment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53 (1): 39–52.
Cross, R., & Sproull, L. 2004. More than an answer: Information relationships for actionable knowledge. Organization Science, 15 (4): 446–462.
Drolet, A. L., & Morris, M. W. 2000. Rapport in conflict resolution: Accounting for how face-to-face contact fosters mutual cooperation in mixed-motive conflicts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36 (1): 26–50.
Farh, J., Tsui, A. S., Xin, K., & Cheng, B. 1998. The influence of relational demography and guanxi: The Chinese case. Organization Science, 9 (4): 471–488.
Flynn, F. J. 2005. Identity orientations and forms of social exchange in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 30 (4): 737–750.
Granovetter, M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78 (6): 1360–1380.
Guthrie, D. 1998. The declining significance of guanxi in China's economic transition. China Quarterly, 154 (3): 254–282.
Hausman, J. 1978. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46 (6): 1251–1271.
Hausman, J., Hall, B. H., & Griliches, Z. 1984. Econometric-models for count data with an application to the patents–R&D relationship. Econometrica, 52 (4): 909–938.
Ho, D. Y. F. 1976. On the concept of face. American Journal of Sociology, 81 (4): 867–884.
Ho, D. Y. F. 1998. Interpersonal relationships and relationship dominance: An analysis based on methodological relationism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1 (1): 1–16.
Hoffman, D., Griffin, M., & Gavin, M. 2000. The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. In K. Klein & S. Kozlowski (Eds), Multlilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: 467–511. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Hsu, F. L. K. 1953. Americans and Chinese: Two ways of life. New York: Abelard-Schuman.
Hsu, F. L. K. 1971. A hypothesis on kinship and culture. In F. L. K. Hsu (Ed.), Kinship and culture: 3–30. Chicago: Aldine.
Hung, C. F. 2004. Cultural influence on relationship cultivation strategies: Multinational companies in China. Journal of Communication Management, 8 (3): 264–281.
Ingram, P., & Roberts, P. W. 2000. Friendships among competitors in the Sydney hotel industry. The American Journal of Sociology, 106 (2): 387–423.
Janicik, G. A., & Larrick, R. P. 2005. Social network schemas and the learning of incomplete networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88 (2): 348–364.
Kao, J. 1993. The worldwide web of Chinese business. Harvard Business Review, 71 (2): 24–36.
King, A. Y. 1991. Kuan-hsi and network building: A sociological interpretation. Daedalus, 120 (2): 63–84.
Klein, K. J., Dansereau, F., & Hall, R. J. 1994. Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 19 (2): 195–229.
Kramer, R. M. 1999. Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50: 569–598.
Lai, G. 1995. Work and family roles and psychological well-being in urban China. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36 (1): 11–37.
Lang, O. 1946. Chinese family and society. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Levin, D. Z., & Cross, R. 2004. The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50 (11): 1477–1490.
Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. 1996. Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research: 114–139. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. 1985. Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63 (4): 967–985.
Lin, N. 2001. Guanxi: A conceptual analysis. In A. So, N. Lin & D. Poston (Eds), The Chinese triangle of mainland, Taiwan, and Hong Kong: Comparative institutional analysis: 153–166. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. 1991. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98 (2): 224–253.
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. 1995. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20 (3): 709–734.
McAllister, D. J. 1995. Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (1): 24–59.
Morris, M. W., Podolny, J., & Sullivan, B. 2008. Culture and coworker relations: Interpersonal patterns in American, Chinese, German, and Spanish divisions of a global retail bank. Organization Science, advance online publication 11 February. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0333.
Ng, I., & Chow, I. H. 2005. Does networking with colleagues matter in enhancing job performance? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22 (4): 405–421.
Oyserman, D. 1993. The lens of personhood: Viewing the self and others in a multicultural society. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65 (5): 993–1009.
Oyserman, D., & Markus, H. R. 1993. The sociocultural self. In J. Suls (Ed.), The self in social perspective: 187–220. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pearce, J. L., & Robinson, R. B. 2000. Cultivating guanxi as a foreign investor strategy. Business Horizon, 43 (1): 31–38.
Peng, Y. 2004. Kinship networks and entrepreneurs in China's transitional economy. The American Journal of Sociology, 109 (5): 1045–1074.
Rao, A. K., Pearce, J. L., & Xin, K. 2005. Governments, reciprocal exchange, and trust among business associates. Journal of International Business Studies, 36 (1): 104–118.
Redding, G., & Wong, G. Y. Y. 1986. The psychology of Chinese organizational behavior. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The psychology of Chinese people: 267–295. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. D. 1985. Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49 (1): 95–112.
Sahlins, M. D. 1972. Stone age economics. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
Sanchez-Burks, J. 2002. Protestant relational ideology and (in)attention to relational cues in work settings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83 (4): 919–929.
Sanchez-Burks, J., Lee, F., Choi, I., Nisbett, R. E., Zhao, S., & Koo, J. 2003. Conversing across cultures: East–West communication styles in work and nonwork contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85 (2): 363–372.
Silver, A. 1990. Friendship in commercial society: Eighteenth-century social theory and modern sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 95 (6): 1474–1504.
Tong, C. K., & Yong, P. K. 1998. Guanxi bases, Xinyong, and Chinese business networks. The British Journal of Sociology, 49 (1): 75–96.
Triandis, H. C. 1995. Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Triandis, H. C. 2001. Individualism–collectivism and personality. Journal of Personality, 69 (6): 907–924.
Trompenaars, A. 1994. Riding the waves of culture: Understanding diversity in global business. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin.
Tsui, A., & Farh, J. L. 1997. Where guanxi matters: Relational demography and guanxi in the Chinese context. Work Occupation, 24 (1): 56–79.
Tsui, A., Farh, L., & Xin, C. 2004. Particularistic ties and structural holes in Chinese managerial networks. Working paper, Arizona State University.
Vanhonacker, W. R. 2004. Guanxi networks in China: How to be the spider, not the fly. The China Business Review, May–June: 48–53.
Weber, M. 1904/1930. Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Winchester, MA: Allen & Unwin, Inc.
Wellman, B., Chen, W., & Dong, W. 2001. Networking guanxi. In T. Gold, D. Guthrie & D. Wank (Eds), Social networks in China: Institutions, culture, and the changing nature of guanxi: 221–241. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Xiao, Z., & Tsui, A. S. 2007. When brokers may not work: The cultural contingency of social capital in Chinese high-tech firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52 (1): 1–31.
Xin, K. R., & Pearce, J. L. 1996. Guanxi: Connections as substitutes for formal institutional support. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (6): 1641–1658.
Yang, C. F. 1988. Familialism and development: An examination of the role of family in contemporary China mainland, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. In D. Sinha & H. S. R. Kao (Eds), Social values and development: Asian perspectives: 93–123. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Yang, H., Van de Vliert, E., & Shi, K. 2005. Siding in a workplace dispute in China: The impact of legitimacy, sanction, and guanxi. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 5 (3): 329–347.
Yang, K. S. 1992. Chinese social orientation: From the social interaction perspective. In K. S. Yang & A. B. Yu (Eds), Chinese psychology and behavior: 87–142. Taipei, Taiwan: Laurel.
Yang, K. S. 1998. Familization, pan-familism, and organization management. In B.-S. Cheng, K.-L. Huang & C.-C. Kuo (Eds), The management in Taiwan and China, Vol. 4: Chinese legacies and management in Taiwan and China: 19–60. Taipei, Taiwan: Yuan-Liou Publishing.
Yang, M. M. 1994. Gifts, favors, and banquets: The art of social relationships in China. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Yeung, I. Y. M., & Tung, R. L. 1996. Achieving business success in Confucian societies: The importance of guanxi (connections). Organizational Dynamics, 25 (2): 54–65.
Zelizer, V. A. 2005. The purchase of intimacy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Zucker, L. G. 1986. Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 8: 53–111. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Departmental Editor, Professor Kwok Leung, and three anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and editorial advice throughout the review process. We also thank members of the Morris Lab for comments and suggestions on earlier versions of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Accepted by Kwok Leung, Departmental Editor, 14 November 2007. This paper has been with the authors for two revisions.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chua, R., Morris, M. & Ingram, P. Guanxi vs networking: Distinctive configurations of affect- and cognition-based trust in the networks of Chinese vs American managers. J Int Bus Stud 40, 490–508 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400422
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400422