Skip to main content
Log in

Reconstructing International Relations Through World History: Oriental Globalization and the Global–Dialogic Conception of Inter-Civilizational Relations

  • Article
  • Published:
International Politics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, I seek to move the agenda for historical sociology of international relations (HSIR) onto the next stage of research by considering how both international relations (IR) and HSIR can benefit from entering into a dialogue with World History and, more specifically, with what I call the ‘new global history’. This is necessary because much of IR — and ironically, the vast majority of HSIR — suffers from ahistorical Eurocentrism. In this article, I begin the process of reconstructing IR by drawing on a range of non-Eurocentric arguments that are furnished in the new global history. My overarching framework explores how ‘Eastern agency’ and ‘Oriental globalization’ have informed many of the developments in world politics that are conventionally assumed to have Western origins. More specifically, I show how various global–dialogic relationships conducted between Eastern and Western agents have shaped the modern world, in particular capitalist modernity and the rise and spread of the sovereign state. In the final part of the article, I argue that great power politics under Oriental globalization differed fundamentally from Western hegemony/imperialism, thereby debunking the myth that great power politics can be universalized through time and place. In the conclusion, I suggest various areas of future research that could propel both IR and HSIR out of their ahistorical Eurocentric impasse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See, for example, Buzan et al. (1993); Spruyt (1994); Rosenberg (1994); Linklater (1998); Hobden (1998); Reus-Smit (1999); Hall (1999); Halliday (1999); Buzan and Little (2000); Hobden and Hobson (2002); Teschke (2003); Lawson (2005); Jönsson and Hall (2005); Seabrooke (2006).

  2. I owe this phrase to George Lawson.

References

  • Abernethy, D. (2000) The Dynamics of Global Dominance, New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Lughod, J.L. (1989) Before European Hegemony, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, S. (1989) Eurocentrism, London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrighi, G. (1994) The Long Twentieth Century, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkawi, T. and Laffey, M. (2006) ‘The Postcolonial Moment in Security Studies’, Review of International Studies 32 (2): 329–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayly, C.A. (2004) The Birth of the Modern World, 1780–1914, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, J. (1993) Old World Encounters, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernal, M. (1991) Black Athena, Vol. 1, London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhabha, H. (1994) The Location of Culture, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaut, J.M. (1993) The Colonizer's Model of the World, London: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, H. and Watson, A. (eds.) (1984) The Expansion of International Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B., Jones, C. and Little, R. (1993) The Logic of Anarchy, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B. and Little, R. (2000) International Systems in World History, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R.W. (1986) ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’, in R.O. Keohane (ed.) Neorealism and its Critics, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R.W. (1987) Production, Power and World Order, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtin, P.D. (1984) Cross-Cultural Trade in World History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Denemark, R., Friedman, J., Gills, B.K. and Modelski, G. (eds.) (2000) World System History, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, G. (1997) ‘The Foreign Staple Trade of China in the Pre-Modern Era’, International History Review 19 (2): 253–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fanon, F. (1961/1990) The Wretched of the Earth, Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Armesto, F. (1996) Millennium, London: Black Swan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, D. and Giraldez, A. (1994) ‘China and the Manila Galleons’, in A.J.H. Latham and H. Kawakatsu (eds.) Japanese Industrialization and the Asian Economy, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A.G. (1998) ReOrient, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A.G. and Gills, B.K. (eds.) (1996) The World System, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, R. (1981) War and Change in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone, J.A. (2000) ‘The Rise of the West — or Not? A Revision to Socio-Economic History’, Sociological Theory 18 (2): 175–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, G.W. (1984) The Standard of ‘Civilisation’ in International Society, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goody, J. (1996) The East in the West, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goody, J. (2004) Islam in Europe, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M. and Jackson, P.T. (eds.) (2007) Writing Civilizations, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R.B. (1999) National Collective Identity, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, F. (1999) Revolution in World Politics, London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D. and Perraton, J. (1999) Global Transformations, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, E.A. and Tucker, R. (2001) ‘Clear and Present Strangers: The Clash of Civilizations and International Conflict’, International Studies Quarterly 45 (2): 317–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobden, S. (1998) International Relations and Historical Sociology, London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hobden, S. and Hobson, J.M. (eds.) (2002) Historical Sociology of International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, J.M. (2002) ‘What's at Stake in “Bringing Historical Sociology Back Into International Relations?” Beyond “Chronofetishist” and “Tempocentric” International Relations Theory’, in S. Hobden and J.M. Hobson (eds.) Historical Sociology of International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, J.M. (2004) The Eastern Origins of Western Civilisation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, J.M. (2007) ‘Is Critical Theory Always For the White West and For Western Imperialism? Beyond Westphilian, Towards a Post-Racist, International Relations’, Review of International Studies 33 (2).

  • Hobson, J.M. and Seabrooke, L. (2007) ‘Introduction: Decentring the Discipline — Revitalising the Margins’, in J.M. Hobson and L. Seabrooke (eds.) Everyday Politics of the World Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, M.G.S. (1974) The Venture of Islam, Vol. 3 Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holton, R.J. (1998) Globalization and the Nation-State, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, A.G. (ed.) (2002) Globalization in World History, London: Pimlico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S.P. (1996) The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, London: Touchstone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S.P. (2005) Who are We?, London: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P.T. (1999) ‘“Civilization” on Trial’, Millennium 28 (1): 141–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jönsson, C. and Hall, M. (2005) Essence of Diplomacy, London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, P.M. (1988) The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers, London: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindleberger, C.P. (1996) World Economic Primacy, 1500–1990, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landes, D.S. (1998) The Wealth and Poverty of Nations, London: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, G. (2005) Negotiated Revolutions, London: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levathes, L. (1994) When China Ruled the Seas, London: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linklater, A. (1998) The Transformation of Political Community, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. (1986) The Sources of Social Power, I, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, W.H. (1963) The Rise of the West, Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, W.H. (1995) ‘The Rise of the West After Twenty-Five Years’, in S.K. Sanderson (ed.) Civilisations and World Systems, London: Altamira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nederveen Pieterse, J. (1990) Empire and Emancipation, London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomeranz, K. (2000) The Great Divergence, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponting, C. (2000) World History, London: Chatto & Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, M.L. (1992) Imperial Eyes, London: Routledge.

  • Reus-Smit, C. (1999) The Moral Purpose of the State, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J.M. (1985) The Triumph of the West, London: BBC Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, J. (1994) The Empire of Civil Society, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, J. (2005) ‘Globalisation Theory — A Post-Mortem’, International Politics 42 (1): 2–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rostow, W.W. (1960) The Stages of Economic Growth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J.G. (1998) Constructing the World Polity, London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Said, E.W. (1978) Orientalism, Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seabrooke, L. (2006) The Social Sources of Financial Power, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spengler, O. (1932/1971) The Decline of the West, London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spruyt, H. (1994) The Sovereign State and its Competitors, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, S. (2005) ‘Japan's Socialization into Janus-Faced European International Society’, European Journal of International Relations 11 (1): 137–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teschke, B. (2003) The Myth of 1648, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1990) Coercion, Capital and European States, AD 990–1990, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toynbee, A. (1948) Civilization on Trial, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. (1984) The Politics of the World-Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, E.R. (1982) Europe and the People Without History, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. (2001) ‘System, Empire and State in Chinese International Relations’, in M. Cox, K. Booth and T. Dunne (eds.) Empires, Systems and States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hobson, J. Reconstructing International Relations Through World History: Oriental Globalization and the Global–Dialogic Conception of Inter-Civilizational Relations. Int Polit 44, 414–430 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800198

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800198

Keywords

Navigation