Abstract
Achievement of the full set of EU objectives in the long run requires basic and critical research in the social sciences and the humanities. A European Research Council (ERC) may offer economies of scale, the alleviation of coordination problems, and the provision of public goods or ‘club goods’ to the social sciences and humanities. It should focus on data sharing and large comparative projects; raising public awareness of the value of the social sciences and humanities, and funding basic and critical research in these disciplines – not just research offering immediate-term extrinsic pay-offs. In order to function properly, such a body should develop standards of assessment and peer review processes that are appropriate for research in the social sciences and humanities. An ERC must receive ‘fresh money’; it must minimise transaction costs – both to attract good applicants and to fund as many of them as possible – and, by giving priority to academic excellence over Lisbon relevance and geography, it must maximise its credibility as a supporter of high-quality research. At a time when competition is supposed to foster excellence in research, academies and private funding bodies must continue to be competitors of the European Research Council.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Academia Europaea (2003) ‘Towards a European Research Council’, available at http://www.acadeuro.org/downloads/ERC_full_statement.rtf.
Academia Europaea (2004) ‘The Role of the Humanities in the European Research Area’, available at http://www.acadeuro.org/downloads/Humanities_statement.pdf.
Barroso, J.M. (2005) ‘Working together for growth and jobs: A new start for the Lisbon strategy’, COM, 2 February 2005, p. 24.
European Commission (2005) ‘Proposal … concerning the seventh framework programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013)’, available at http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/future/pdf/com-fp7-proposals_en.pdf.
Follesdal, A. (1998) ‘Subsidiarity’, Journal of Political Philosophy 6 (2): 231–259.
Follesdal, A. (2003) ‘The political theory of the white paper on governance: Hidden and fascinating’, European Public Law 9 (1): 73–86.
Hix, S. (2004) ‘European universities in a global ranking of political science departments’, European Political Science 3 (2): 5–23.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Precursors of these reflections were prepared for a workshop on ‘The Role of the Humanities and Social Sciences in the Funding Portfolio of the future European Research Council’, Budapest 11–12 February 2005, hosted by several private European research funding bodies and the Central European University. I am grateful to the hosts of the workshop, Rector Yehuda Elkana of the Central European University, Managing Director Dan Brändström of the Svenska Riksbankens Jubileumsfond, Generalsekretär Wilhelm Krull of the Volkswagen Stiftung and Director Anthony Tomei of the Nuffield Foundation. I have benefited from the suggestions of Øivind Andersen, David Coates, Trygve Lande, Olof Petersson, Nils Roll-Hansen, Ragnhild Sohlberg, Trine Syvertsen, the editors and publications of the Academia Europaea (2003, 2004). They of course bear no responsibility for my opinions, presented here only in my personal capacity.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Follesdal, A. a european research council (ERC) for the social sciences and humanities: pros and cons. Eur Polit Sci 5, 21–32 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210068
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210068