Skip to main content
Log in

Is Local Government Spending Converging?

  • Article
  • Published:
Eastern Economic Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A substantial body of theoretical and empirical evidence demonstrates that interregional competition for factors of production leads to convergence of per capita output. Is there an analogous process that leads to convergence of public sector activity? Skidmore et al. develop a model that is consistent with the macroeconomic growth literature, which predicts convergence in government spending. Using this framework, we test for convergence in government spending using detailed data from Wisconsin for a variety of municipal government expenditure categories over the period 1990–2000. Our empirical investigation provides compelling evidence of convergence in per capita government spending for all the expenditure categories we study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Another strand of the public choice literature emphasizes the potential for bureaucrats to use their position to expand government beyond the level desired by the median voter. See, for example, Niskanen's [1971] model of the budget-maximizing bureaucrat and Brennan and Buchanan's [1980] view of government as leviathan.

  2. Public spending as an input to private output has been modeled in the economic development literature. See for example DeSoto [2000] and Acemoglu [2005].

  3. Unincorporated towns are not included because of the fundamentally different statutory authority between cities/villages and towns.

  4. Thanks to a project funded by the University of Wisconsin-Extension, data on revenues and expenditures for all municipalities in Wisconsin are available over the 1987–2004 period. We evaluate spending over the 1990–2000 period so that we can appropriately match economic and demographic data from the census with our fiscal data. Also recall that in order to minimize spikes in the data we use an average for 1989–1990 and 1999–2000. Unless otherwise noted, references to 1990 fiscal data are in reality an average over 1989–1990 and 2000 fiscal data are an average of 1999–2000.

  5. Given that convergence is generally considered a long-run phenomenon, the 10-year time period analyzed here is a relatively short time frame. Unfortunately, data limitations prevent us from examining the issue over a longer period.

  6. Human capital may also be a determinant of public expenditures on the demand side.

  7. These factors may also to control for factors that may lead to differences across municipalities in the average tax rate.

  8. The 0.77 figure can be derived from equation (4),

    which implies that lng t =constant−0.23lng t −1+lng t −1=constant+0.77lng t −1.

  9. We note that actual rates of convergence are much slower than this estimate suggests because of the offsetting effects of other factors that determine growth in spending.

  10. In fact, the coefficient on initial quality of life spending implies a negative marginal product. This seemingly unrealistic result may be due to other unexplained factors not controlled for in the regression. Also note that the work of Deller and Maher [2005] indicates that in Wisconsin quality of life services may be overprovided in a handful of municipalities. While this finding may not fully explain a negative marginal product, it is not inconsistent with a negative marginal product. A more straightforward explanation could be the “luxury” nature of these services. During times of fiscal stress [boom], these services may be the first to be cut [or expanded].

  11. The “non-conditional” convergence model can be formally expressed as

    “Conditional” convergence models expand upon this formulation by addition of control variables such as the structure of the economy and other socioeconomic variables.

  12. Some existing research has examined convergence in the context of spatial econometric techniques [Coughlin et al. 2006; Ertur et al. 2006], which is one approach to account for spatial relationships such as inter-jurisdictional competition. In addition to the traditional spatial econometrics literature methods of Geographically Weighted Regression where coefficient values are allowed to vary over space may provide an avenue to explore the idea of yardstick competition. Alternatively, if one identified a methodology for determining “competitor” communities, it would be possible to explicitly develop a measure of “yardstick” competition. Further examination of convergence in the context of inter-jurisdictional competition is an important avenue for future research.

References

  • Afexentiou, Panos, and Apostolos Serletis . 1996. Government Expenditures in the European Union: Do They Converge or Follow Wagner's Law? International Economic Journal, 16: 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afexentiou, Panos ., 1999. Testing for Government Spending Convergence Across Canadian Provinces. Public Finance Review, 16: 55–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annala, Christopher . 2003. Have State And Local Fiscal Policies Become More Alike? Evidence of Beta Convergence among Fiscal Policy Variables. Public Finance Review, 31: 144–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, Robert . 1992. Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98: 102–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, Robert ., and Xavier Sala-i-Martin . 1992. Converge. Journal of Political Economy, 100: 223–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, Robert ., 1995. Economic Growth. NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley, Timothy, and Anne Case . 1995. Incumbent Behavior: Vote-Seeking, Tax-Setting, and Yardstick Competition. American Economic Review, 85: 25–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bish, Robert L., and Vincent Ostrom . 1979. Understanding Urban Government: Metropolitan Reform Reconsidered, 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, Duncan . 1948. On the Rationale of Group Decision Making. Journal of Political Economy, 133–146.

  • Bowen, Howard . 1943. The Interpretation of Voting in the Allocation of Economic Resources. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 27–48.

  • Coughlin, Cletus, Thomas Garrett, and Ruben Hernandez-Murillo . 2006. Spatial Dependence in Models of State Fiscal Policy Convergence, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper2006-001B. http://research.stlouisfed.org/wp/2006/2006/2006-001.pdf.

  • Deller, Steven, Brian Gould,, and Jones Bruce . 2003. Agriculture and US Rural Economic Growth. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 35: 517–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deller, Steven ., and Craig Maher . 2005. Categorical Municipal Expenditures with a Focus on the Flypaper Effect. Public Budgeting and Finance, 36: 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deller, Steven ., 2006. A Model of Asymmetries in the Flypaper Effect. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 213–229.

  • Deller, Steven, David Marcouiller, D.B.K. English, and V. Lledo . (2005). Regional Economic Growth with a Focus on Amenities, in Amenities and Rural Development: Theory, Methods and Public Policy, edited by G. Green, S. C. Deller and D. Marcouiller Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deller, Steven, T.S.H. Tsai, David Marcouiller, and D.B.K. English . 2001. The Role of Amenities and Quality of Life in Rural Economic Growth. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83: 352–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dissart, Jean-Claude, and Steven Deller . 2000. Quality of Life in the Planning Literature. Journal of Planning Literature, 135–161.

  • Durlauf, Steven . 2000. Econometric Analysis and the Study of Economic Growth: A Skeptical Perspective, in Macroeconomics and the Real World, edited by R. Backhouse and A. Salanti Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durlauf, Steven, and Danny Quah . 1999. The New Empirics of Economic Growth, in Handbook of Macroeconomics, edited by J. Taylor and M. Woodford Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam, Nazrul . 2003. What Have We Learned from the Convergence Debate? Journal of Economic Surveys, 110: 309–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, Ross, and David Renelt . 1992. A Sensitivity Analysis of Cross-Country Growth Regressions. American Economic Review, 82: 942–963.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, James C., and Johan Olsen . 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, Barbara Coyle, and Janet Coble Vinzant . 1999. Governance Lessons: The Case of Charter Schools. Administration & Society, 361–377.

  • Merriman, David, and M. Mark Skidmore . 2001. Convergence in State Government Health Care Spending and Fiscal Distress. Proceedings of the Ninety-Fourth Annual Conference of the National Tax Association.

  • Peterson, Paul E . 1981. City Limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sala-i-Martin, Xavier . 1997. I Just Ran Two Million Regressions. American Economic Review, 87: 178–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scully, Gerald . 1991. The Convergence of Fiscal Regimes and the Decline of the Tiebout Effect. Public Choice, 1991: 51–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skidmore, Mark, Hideki Toya, and David Merriman . 2004. Convergence in Government Spending: Theory and Cross-Country Evidence. Kyklos, 57: 587–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow, Robert . 1956. A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64: 65–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiebout, Charles . 1956. The Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64: 416–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, J . 1994. (Almost) Nothing New under the Sun: Why the Work of Budgeting Remains Incremental. Public Budgeting and Finance, 111–113.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank two anonymous referees and the editor for a number of helpful comments and suggestions. Any remaining errors are the sole responsibility of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendix A

Appendix A

Table A1

Table a1 Income convergence regressions (Absolute value of asymptotic t-statistics in parentheses)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Skidmore, M., Deller, S. Is Local Government Spending Converging?. Eastern Econ J 34, 41–55 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.eej.9050019

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.eej.9050019

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation