Skip to main content
Log in

Integrating Feminist Agendas: Gender justice and economic justice

  • Dialogue
  • Published:
Development Aims and scope

Abstract

Vibrant and vital global feminist movements have developed over the past 30 years to address a broad agenda for women's rights. Carol Barton argues that, in many cases these movements have tended to focus on specific issues, and in particular, to prioritize one over another. This is particularly true in a divide between those working on gender justice issues, including sexual and reproductive health, violence, and women's control over their bodies, and women working on a broad development and/or economic justice agenda. Efforts like Cairo and Beijing UN conferences that link these themes have not always changed the fact of specialization among women's organizations. This has had significant political implications, where feminist agendas have been pitted against each other in official venues such as the UN. Barton gives a brief history of this dichotomy and its pitfalls, the implications for the Millennium Development Goals and Millennium Summit process, and important new efforts to integrate feminist agendas, including the Feminist Dialogues, the Feminist Task Force of the Global Call Against Poverty, the Countdown 2015 campaign, and recent collaborations at the UN Beijing+10 review.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We differentiate between development and economic justice. Development has multiple definitions, the best of which links sustainability, economic growth, equality and social protection (emerging from UN conferences of the 1990s). However, development is often boiled down to economic development, based on growth. The ‘development’ community is equally diverse, ranging from governments and multilateral agencies to donor agencies to activists, and from state-driven national projects to income generation schemes to broad social change agendas. Here we use ‘economic justice’ to mean an agenda for systemic changes that redistribute power and wealth across inequities of gender, race, class and nation. Note that we refer to the three realms of gender, economics and security, but proceed to look most directly at gender justice and economic justice. This is a reflection of our own limitations in addressing the peace and security realm, symptomatic of our internal fifedoms. Harcourt (Harcourt, 2005: 23–24) makes a strong case for feminists to take the security agenda more seriously. ‘We cannot pretend governments will keep their (MDG) promises if there is international pressure to spend money elsewhere – such as the military, on top of the pressure to enter the world market. Nor can we deliver health and education services if there is on-going conflict which is destroying those services…Gender is about power relations, so in terms of security we are speaking about hierarchical patriarchal relations where masculine orders determine behaviour which condone violence and rape as a weapon of war.’

  2. Since that writing, the US under the Bush Administration has now joined this conservative group on moral issues related to women's rights, but not, of course, on challenges to G-8 hegemony.

References

  • Barton, Carol (2005) ‘Women's Movements and Gender Perspectives on the Millennium Development Goals’, in United Nations Development Program Civil Society Unit, Civil Society Perspectives on the Millennium Development Goals, March.

  • Barton, Carol (2004) ‘Global Women's Movements at a Crossroads: Seeking definition, new alliances and greater impact’, Socialism & Democracy 18(1) January–June, New York, NY.

  • Barton, Carol and Laurie Prendergast (eds.) (2004) Seeking Accountability on Women's Human Rights, Women Debate the UN Millennium Development Goals, New York: Women's International Coalition for Economic Justice, January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendaña, Alejandro (2004) ‘“Good Governance” and the MDGs: Contradictory or Complementary?’, paper presented at the Institute for Global Network, Information and Studies conference, Oslo, 20 September. Focus-on-Trade #105, Bankok: Focus on the Global South.

  • Elson, Diane (2004) ‘The Millennium Development Goals, A Feminist Economics Perspective’, 52nd Dies Natalis Address, The Hague, 7 October.

  • Fall, Yassine (2004) ‘Skepticism and Hope’, in Carol Barton and Laurie Prendergast (eds.) Seeking Accountability on Women's Human Rights, Women Debate the UN Millennium Development Goals, New York: Women's International Coalition for Economic Justice, January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girard, Francoise (2005) ‘Sex and the Hemisphere, The Millennium Development Goals and Sexual and Reproductive Health in Latin America and the Caribbean’, Conference Report, New York: International Planned Parenthood Federation, Western Hemisphere Region.

  • Global Call Against Poverty (2005) ‘A Global Call Against Poverty, A Global Call to Women's Rights’, brochure, March.

  • Grown, Caren, Geeta Rao Gupta and Aslihan Kes (2005) ‘Taking Action: Achieving gender equality and empowering women’, UN Millennium Project Task Force on Education and Gender Equality, New York: Millennium Project.

  • Harcourt, Wendy (ed.) (2005) ‘Report on the NCDO-SID-WIDE International Workshop on the Millennium Development Goals, Gender Equality and Human Security’, 18 May, The Netherlands.

  • Klein, Naomi (2003) ‘Privatization in Disguise’, The Nation, 15 April.

  • Klein, Naomi (2004) ‘Bhagdad Year Zero’, Harpers, September.

  • MADRE (2005) ‘Madre Opposes Abolition of Iraqi Women's Human Rights in Draft Constitution’, Press Release, 21 July.

  • Neuhold, Brita (2005) ‘Focus on Human Rights and Gender Justice: Linking the MDGs with CEDAW and the Beijing Platform for Action’, Policy Paper for Beijing+10 and MDG+5 Reviews, WIDE Austria, February.

  • Omang, Joanne (2005) ‘Women's Rights Conference Reaches Fragile Consensus on Trafficking’, Women's Human Rights Net.

  • Sachs, Jeffery (2005) Investing in Development: A Practical Plan to Achieve the MDGs, New York: UN Millennium Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, Kristin, Alexandra Spieldoch and Maria Riley (eds.) (2005) Bankrupt US Economic Policy Forecloses on Women's Human Rights, Washington DC: US Gender & Trade Network, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Gita and Sonia Corrêa (2000) ‘Gender Justice and Economic Justice: Reflections on the Five Year Reviews of the UN Conferences of the 1990s’, DAWN.

  • Suskind, Yifat (2004) ‘One Year Later: Women's Human Rights in ‘Liberated’ Iraq’, MADRE, Spring.

  • United Nations (2005a) ‘Economic Advancement of Women’, UN Commission on the Status of Women, March.

  • United Nations (2005b) ‘‘Secretary General's Report, ‘In Larger Freedom: Towards Development, Security and Human Rights for All’, New York, March.

  • Williams, Mariama (2005) ‘Tensions Between the Role of Trade, Development and Gender Equality’, WTO Public Symposium, 20–22 April, Geneva: WTO.

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Questions how to balance economic justice and body politics

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barton, C. Integrating Feminist Agendas: Gender justice and economic justice. Development 48, 75–84 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.development.1100182

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.development.1100182

Keywords

Navigation