Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

From Communities of Practice to Communities of Resistance: Civil society and cognitive justice

  • Dialogue
  • Published:
Development Aims and scope

Abstract

Maja van der Velden looks at how knowledge and power are played out in development literature and practice examining the role of knowledge, public goods and the new information communications technology (ICT) in managing and sharing knowledge. She discusses the World Bank's knowledge-for-development paradigm arguing that the paradigm of knowledge management on which it is based will lead to a grave loss of knowledge. She concludes that civil society can further its social justice and developments objectives by protecting knowers and their physical and cultural environments and by facilitating the dialogues of different knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See www.globalknowledge.org and www.developmentgateway.org. International organizations and research institutes around the world are inspired by or have modelled their KM activities after the ‘Knowledge Bank’ (see also King, and McGrath, 2003). For example, UNDP has established a distributed system for explicit and tacit knowledge sharing – the Sub-regional Resource Facilities (SURFs) that is similar to the World Bank's internal Communities of Practice or thematic groups. Overall, KM's introduction to the development sector has been top-down, from the corporate sector in the ‘north’, via the World Bank and international development agencies, to development organizations in the ‘south’. Bellanet is one of those organizations that play an important role in promoting KM and facilitating the exchange of KM for development experiences via its international workshops and mailing lists (see www.bellanet.org/km/). It is also interesting to look at the KM pedigree in individual organizations. For example, Tearfund, a British development NGO, mentions the US Army and BP/Amoco as its models.

  2. Particularly in (neo-)evolutionary economic theory. See for example Stehr (2002) for a discussion of the economic role of knowledge.

  3. This example also makes clear that the decision of what is a public good and what is a private good is a political one. In Ghana water used to be a common public good, but is now privatized under pressure from the IMF and World Bank.

  4. 4 Abildgaard (1997) describes the failure of a clean water system in a village in Ghana, even though the system was built with high-level community participation. She found that the villagers' understanding of guinea worms was different from that of the ‘western/scientific’ explanation. Thus, providing scientific causal knowledge did not change the practices of the villagers.

  5. ‘Best practice’, a popular KM tool, strengthens the institutionalization of development knowledge. Best practice refers to an organization's most effective approach to a problem. Through ICT, best practices are widely shared within the development community.

  6. Jensen (2000) calls in this context also for a cultural relativism, based on culture-as-knowledge. In development, culture is generally understood as an obstacle to development, not as knowledge. If people with new knowledge are not behaving as expected, it is their culture that obstructs change. Culture is not perceived as a position from which one sees, knows, act, but as culture-as-tradition.

  7. ‘Communities of resistance’ is the title of a publication by Sivanandan, (1990), and discusses the black struggles and inner-city uprisings in the UK.

References

  • Abildgaard Annelie (1997) ‘Suspecting Water: Drinking Water – perception, practice, and knowledge’, Master's thesis, Institute of Ethnography and Social Anthropology University of Aarhus, Denmark.

  • Agrawal Arun (1995) ‘Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge: Some critical comments’, in Indigenous Knowledge and Development Monitor 3(3), available at: www.nuffic.nl/ciran/ikdm/3-3/articles/agrawal.html, [Accessed Jan 2003].

  • Berger Peter L and Luckmann Thomas (1966) The Social Construction of Reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge, New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollier David (2002) Silent Theft: The private plunder of our common wealth. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chataway J. and D. Wield (2000) ‘Industrialization, Innovation and Development: What does knowledge management Change? Journal of International Development 12: 803–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen Thomas Hylland (2001) Tyranny of the Moment: Fast and slow time in the information age. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar Arturo (1995) ‘Encountering Development: The making and unmaking of the third world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Universty Press.

  • Escobar Arturo (2003) ‘Other Worlds Are (Already) Possible: Cyber-internationalism and post-capitalist cultures’.

  • Goldman M., (2001) ‘The Birth of a Discipline: Producing authoritative green knowledge, World Bank-style, Ethnography 2 (2).

  • Inclen Trust (2002) Unit 1: Information and Communication Technologies in Knowledge Management. available at: http://www.inclentrust.org/Modules/Module_Two_KnowledgeManagement/Unit1.pdf, [Accessed Jan 2003].

  • Jensen Majken Juhl (2000) Rational Realities: Whose knowledge counts? The importance of anthropology as anthropology in Development. Aarhus: University of Aarhus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone Justine (2002) Knowledge Perspectives on ICT and Development: What the theory of knowledge can add. London: London School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kampfner John (2001) Ghana: Prisoner of the IMF, BBC World, 5 November, available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/from_our_own_correspondent/1634514.stm, [Accessed Jan 2003].

    Google Scholar 

  • King Kenneth and Simon McGrath (2003) Knowledge Sharing in Development Agencies: Lessons from four cases, available at: http://open.bellanet.org/km/modules.php?op=modload&name=DownloadsPlus&file=index&req=getit&lid=13, [Accessed March 2003].

  • Kraak Andre (1999) Western Science, Power and the Marginalization of Indigenous Modes of Knowledge Production, available at: http://www.chet.org.za/oldsite/debates/19990407report.html, [Accessed Jan 2003].

  • Lal Vinay (2002) Empire of Knowledge: Culture and plurality in the global economy, London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nustad Karl and Ole Sending (2000) ‘The Instrumentalization of Development Knowledge’, in D. Stone (ed.) Banking on Knowledge: The genesis of the global development network, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker Jenneth (2000) ‘Indigenous/Local/Traditional Knowledges: Issues for education in support of Agenda 21’, available at: http://www.unedforum.org/education/jppap.htm, [Accessed Jan 2003].

  • Shiva Vandana (1993) Monocultures of the Mind: Perspectives on biodiversity and biotechnology, New Delhi: Natraj Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiva Vandana (1997) Biopiracy: The plunder of nature and knowledge, Cambridge, MA: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivanandan A (1996) ‘Heresies and Prophesies: The social and political fall-out of the technological revolution – an interview. Race & Class 37(4).

  • Sivanandan A (1990) Communities of Resistance: Writings on black struggles for socialism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith Neil (1996) ‘Spaces of Vulnerability: The space of flows and the politics of scale, Critique of Anthropology 16 (1).

  • Stehr Nico (2002) Knowledge and Economic Conduct: The social foundations of the modern economy, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz Joseph (2000) ‘Scan Globally, Reinvent Locally: Knowledge infrastructure and the localization of knowledge’, in D. Stone (ed.) Banking on Knowledge, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone D (ed) (2000) Banking on Knowledge: The genesis of Global Development Network. New York, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres Rosa-María (2001) ‘Knowledge-based International Aid: Do we want it, do we need it?’ in W. Gmelin, K. King and S. McGrath (eds) Knowledge, Research and International Cooperation. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (2001) Human Development Report 2001: Making new technologies work for human development, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • van der Velden Maja (2002a) ‘Knowledge Facts, Knowledge Fiction: The role of ICTs in knowledge management for development, Journal of International Development 14.

  • van der Velden Maja (2002b) ‘The End of Diversity? Knowledge, ICTs and the development Gateway’, in Fay Sudweeks and Charles Ess (eds) Third International Conference on Cultural Attitudes Towards Technology and Communication 2002. Murdoch, Australia: Murdoch University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk Teun A . (2002) Discourse, Knowledge and Ideology: Reformulating old questions, Paper LAUD 2002 University of Amsterdam and Universitat Pompeu Fabra, (second version, 22 March).

    Google Scholar 

  • Visvanathan Shiv (2001) ‘Knowledge and Information in the Network Society’, available at: http://www.india-seminar.com/2001/503/503%20shiv%20visvanathan.htm, [Accessed Jan 2003].

  • Wenger Etienne, R. McDermott and W.M. Snyder. (2002) Cultivating Communities of Practice: A guide to managing knowledge, Harvard: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson T.D. (2002) The Nonsense of ‘Knowledge Management’, available at: http://www.informationr.net/ir/8-1/paper144.html, [Accessed Jan 2003].

  • Wolfensohn James (1996) People and Development: Annual Meeting Address.Washington DC, World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1999) World Development Report 1998/1999: Knowledge for development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van der Velden, M. From Communities of Practice to Communities of Resistance: Civil society and cognitive justice. Development 47, 73–80 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.development.1100004

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.development.1100004

Keywords

Navigation