Skip to main content
Log in

Online and Offline Corporate Brand Images: Do They Differ?

  • Academic Research
  • Published:
Corporate Reputation Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study compares the corporate brand images (CBI) of two book retailers: one that sells exclusively online and the other that sells exclusively offline. The study has adopted measurements developed by Davies et al. (2004) known as the ‘Corporate Character Scale’ in order to measure the two bookstores' CBI. The study is informed by 511 responses from experienced customers of these two bookstores. To identify the difference between offline and online CBI, confirmatory factor analysis was used. Previous literature stresses that Agreeableness and Enterprise were the two most significant variables in predicting online and offline CBI. This study, however, found that consumers appeared to view online CBI as more Informal and Innovative than offline CBI (which appeared to be expressed more in terms of Agreeableness and Competence). In general, the present study adds to the existing literature in branding and reputation in two main ways. First, it puts the concept of emotional brand attributes (the CBI) in a unique context (the internet), and compares it with the bricks-and-mortar context. The present study provides empirical evidence in the context of internet and retail bookstores to enhance the understanding of branding and reputation. Secondly, the practical contribution of the study and its managerial implications can be seen in the context of defining strategy and positioning the corporate brand in the online and offline contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, D.A. (1991) Managing Brand Equity, The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, J.L. (1997) ‘Dimensions of brand personality’, Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 347–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, J.L., Benet-Martinez, V. and Garolera, J. (2000) ‘Consumption symbols as carriers of culture: A study of Japanese and Spanish brand personality constructs’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 492–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ailwadi, K.L. and Keller, K.L. (2004) ‘Understanding retail branding: Conceptual insights and research priorities’, Journal of Retailing, 80, 331–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, G.J. and Gerbing, W.D. (1988) ‘Structural equation modelling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach’, Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle, L.J. (1999) AMOS 4.0 Computer Software, Smallwater, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R.P. (1994) ‘Structural equation model in marketing research’, in R. Bagozzi (ed.), Basic Principle's in Principles of Marketing, Blackwell, Oxford, pp.317–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R.P. and Heatherton, T.F. (1994) ‘A general approach to representing multifaceted personality constructs: Application to state self-esteem’, Structural Equation Modelling, 1, 35–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balabanis, G. and Vassileiou, S. (1999) ‘Some attitudinal predictors of home-shopping through the Internet’, Journal of Marketing Management, 15 (5), 361–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, J.M.T. (1998) ‘Corporate identity and the advent of corporate marketing’, Journal of Marketing Management, 14, 963–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, J.M.T. and Gray, E.R. (2003) ‘Corporate brands: What are they? What of them’, European Journal of Marketing, 37 (7/8), 972–997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batra, R., Myers, G.J. and Aaker, A.D. (1996) Advertising Management, 5th edn, Prentice-Hall, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beren, G. and Van Riel, C.B.M. (2004) ‘Corporate associations in the academic literature: Three main streams of thought in the reputation measurement literature’, Corporate Reputation Review, 7, 161–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergstorm, A., Blumenthal, D. and Crothers, S. (2002) ‘Why internal branding matters: The case of saab’, Corporate Reputation Review, 5 (2/3), 133–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, L.L. (1969) ‘The component of department store image’, Journal of Retailing, 45, 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biel, A. (1991) ‘The brandscape: Converting brand image into equity’, ADMAP, 26 (10), 41–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D.B. (2000) ‘Psychological aspects of corporate identity, image and reputation’, Corporate Reputation Review, 3, 240–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, S.L. and Sparks, L. (2002) ‘Corporate branding, retailing and retail internationalisation’, Corporate Reputation Review, 5, 194–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, S.L. and Sparks, L. (2003) ‘E-commerce and retail process: A review’, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 10, 275–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, P. and Peppard, J.C. (1998) ‘Consumer purchasing on the Internet: Processes and prospects’, European Management Journal, 16 (5), 600–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B.M. (1994) Structural Equation Modelling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B.M. (2001) Structural Equation Modelling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campman, M. (2001) ‘Branding.com: Building brand leadership in the new economy’, Corporate Reputation Review, 2 (3), 200–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, E.W.L. (2001) ‘SEM being more effective than multiple regression in parsimonious development research’, Journal of Management Development, 20, 650–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clauser, R.C. (2001) ‘Offline rules, online tools’, Brand Management, 8 (4), 270–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowles, D.L., Kiecker, P. and Little, M.W. (2002) ‘Using key informant insights as a foundation for e-retailing theory development’, Journal of Business Research, 55 (8), 629–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G. (1991) ‘Retailer advertising strategy’, International Journal of Advertising, 10, 189–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G. and Chun, R. (2002) ‘Gaps between the internal and external perceptions of the corporate brand’, Corporate Reputation Review, 5, 144–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G., Chun, R., Da Silva, R. and Roper, S. (2003) Corporate Reputation and Competitiveness, Routledge, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G., Chun, R., Da Silva, R. and Roper, S. (2004) ‘Corporate character scale to assess employee and customer views of organisation reputation’, Corporate Reputation Review, 7 (2), 125–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G., da Silva, R., Chun, R. and Roper, S. (2001) ‘The personification metaphor as measurement approach’, Corporate Reputation Review, 4, 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davy, J.A., Kinick, A.J. and Scheck, C.L. (1997) ‘A test of job security's direct and mediated effects on withdrawal cognitions’, Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 18, 323–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Chernatony, L. (1999) ‘Brand management through narrowing the gap between brand identity and brand reputation’, Journal of Marketing Management, 15 (1/3), 39–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Chernatony, L. (2001) ‘Succeeding with brands on the Internet’, Journal of Brand Management, 8 (3), 186–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Chernatony, L. and Christodoulides, G. (2004) ‘Taking the brand promise online: Challenges and opportunities’, Interactive Marketing, 5, 238–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Chernatony, L. and Dall'Olmo Riley, F. (1998) ‘Defining a brand: Beyond the literature with experts’ interpretation’, Journal of Marketing Management, 14 (4/5), 417–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Chernatony, L. and Harris, F. (2000) ‘Developing corporate brands through considering internal and external stakeholders’, Corporate Reputation Review, 3, 268–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Chernatony, L. (2002) ‘Would a brand smell any sweeter by a corporate name’, Corporate Reputation Review, 5 (2/3), 114–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte, M. and Davies, G. (2002) ‘The anatomy of the ford brand, Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Corporate Reputation, Sheraton Hotel, Boston, MA, 23–25 May.

  • Fombrun, C. (1996) Reputation: Realising Value from the Corporate Image, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C. and Van Riel, C.B.M. (1996) ‘The reputational landscape’, Corporate Reputation Review, 1 (2), 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franzen, G. and Bouwman, M. (2001) The Mental World of Brands, World Advertising Research Centre, Henley-on-Thames.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, E.R., Lafferty, A.B. and Newell, J.S. (2000) ‘The influence of corporate credibility on consumer attitudes and purchase intent’, Corporate Reputation Review, 3, 304–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, E.R. and Balmer, J.M.T. (1998) ‘Managing corporate image and corporate reputation’, Long Range Planning, 31, 695–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graver, M.S. and Mentzer, J.T. (1999) ‘Logistics research methods: Employing structural equation modelling to test for construct validity’, Journal of Business Logistics, 20, 33–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J.J. (2002) ‘To brand or not to brand? Trade-offs in corporate branding decisions’, Corporate Reputation Review, 5 (2/3), 228–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, C.A., Doherty, N. and Ellis-Chadwick, F. (2000) ‘Retailer adoption of the Internet – Implications for retail marketing’, European Journal of Marketing, 34 (8), 954–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, F.J., Anderson, E.R., Tatham, L.R. and Black, C.W. (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis, Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heijden, der van H. and Verhagen, T. (2004) ‘Online store image: Conceptual foundations and empirical measurement’, Information & Management, 41, 609–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbig, P. and Hale, B. (1997) ‘Internet: The marketing challenge of the twentieth century’, Internet Research Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 17 (2), 95–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, D. (2000) ‘The revolution will not be televised: Introduction to the special issue on marketing science and the Internet’, Marketing Science, 9 (1), 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ind, N. (1997) The Corporate Brand, Great Britain, Macmillan Press Ltd, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ind, N. and Riondino, M.C. (2001) ‘Branding on the web: A real revolution’, Brand Management, 9, 8–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvenpaa, S.L. and Todd, P.A. (1997) ‘Consumer reactions to electronic shopping on the world wide web’, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 1 (2), 59–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvenpaa, S.L. and Tractinsky, N. (1999) ‘Consumer trust in an Internet store: A cross-cultural validation’, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 5 (2). [Online] Available:www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol5/issue/jarvenpaa.html.

  • Jöreskog, K.G. and Sörbom, D. (1982) ‘Recent developments in structural equation modelling’, Journal of Marketing Research, 19 (4), 404–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K.L. (2000) ‘Building and managing corporate brand equity’, in M. Schultz, M.J. Hatch and M.H. Larsen (eds.), The Expressive Organisation: Linking Identity, Reputation and the Corporate Brand, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp.115–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K.L. (2003) ‘Brand synthesis: The multidimensionality of brand knowledge’, Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 595–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keynote (2004) ‘Bookselling’, Market Report, 12th edn., May 2004.

  • King, S. (1973) Developing New Brands, Pitman, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R.B. (1998) Principles and Practices of Structural Equation Modelling, The Guildford Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korgaonkar, P.K. and Wolin, L.D. (1999) ‘A multivariate analysis of web usage’, Journal of Advertising Research, 39 (2), 53–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambin, J-L. (1997) Strategic Marketing Management, McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist, D.J. (1974) ‘Meaning of image’, Journal of Retailing, 50, 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, S.J. (1983) Confirmatory Factor Analysis: A Preface to Lisrel, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Markham, V. (1972) Planning the Corporate Reputation, George Allen and Unwin, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martineau, P. (1958) ‘The personality of retail store’, Harvard Business Review, 36, 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, C. and Gates, R. (2003) Marketing Research Essentials, College Publishing (Thomson Learning), South-Western, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEnally, M.R. and de Chernatony, L. (1999) ‘The evolving nature of branding: Consumer and managerial considerations’, Academy of Marketing Science Review, 1999, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrilees, B. and Louise Fry, M. (2002) ‘Corporate branding: A framework for E-retailers’, Corporate Reputation Review, 5, 213–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintel Report (2004) ‘Leisure shopping-UK’, Leisure Intelligence, October 2004.

  • Murphy, J.M. (1987) Branding A Marketing Tool, The Macmillan Press Limited, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. and Malhotra, A. (2005) ‘E-SQUAL’, Journal of Service Research, 7, 213–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, M. (1999) ‘Re-appraising the concept of brand image’, The Journal of Brand Management, 6, 409–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R.A., Balasubramanian, S. and Bronnenberg, B.J. (1997) ‘Exploring the implications of the Internet for consumer marketing’, Academy of Marketing Science, 25 (4), 329–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D. (2001) ‘Managing reputation in cyberspace’, Journal of Communication Management, 5 (3), 300–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, S.S. and Claycomb, C. (1997) ‘The influence of brand recognition on retail store image’, The Journal of Product and Brand Management, 6 (6), 373–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reedy, J., Schullo, S. and Zimmerman, K. (2000) Electronic Marketing: Integrating Electronic Resources into the Marketing Process, Dryden, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojas-Mendez, J.I., Podlech, I.E. and Olave, E.S. (2004) ‘The ford brand personality in Chile’, Corporate Reputation Review, 7, 232–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, J. (1998) ‘It isn’t entertainment that makes the web shine; It's dull data’, Wall Street Journal, 20 July, p. 1.

  • Schmidt, P. (2005) ‘SEM and longitudinal Data’, The 38th Essex Summer School in Social Science Data Analysis and Collection, University of Essex, Essex, 8–12 August.

  • Schultz, M. and de Chernatony, L. (2002) ‘Introduction: The challenges of corporate branding’, Corporate Reputation Review, 5, 105–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J. (1991) ‘Redundancy in constructs: Problem, assessment, and an illustrative example’, Journal of Business Research, 22 (3), 255–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, A.J. (1961) ‘Basic dimensions of the corporate image’, Journal of Marketing, 25 (6), 47–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starr, M.K. and Robinson, J.R. (1978) ‘A loyalty group segmentation model for brand purchasing simulation’, Journal of Marketing Research, 15 (3), 378–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, H. and Jones, C. (2004) ‘Corporate branding in marketspace’, Corporate Reputation Review, 7 (1), 84–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Supphellen, M. and Nysveen, H. (2001) ‘Drivers of intention to revisit the websites of well-known companies’, International Journal of Market Research, 43 (3), 341–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syzmanski, D.M. and Hise, R.T. (2000) ‘E-Satisfaction: An initial examination’, Journal of Retailing, 76, 309–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Marketing Pocket Book (2005) The Advertising Association (AA), NTC Publication, UK.

  • Thomas, J.W. (1998) ‘The brave new world of Internet marketing’, Direct Marketing, 6 (9), 40–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uncles, M.D. (2001) ‘Interactive electronic marketing and brand management’, Journal of Brand Management, 8 (4/5), 245–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urde, M. (2003) ‘Core value-based corporate brand building’, European Journal of Marketing, 37 (7/8), 1017–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Riel, C.B.M. and Van Bruggen, G.H. (2002) ‘Incorporating business unit managers’ perspectives in corporate branding strategy decision making’, Corporate Reputation Review, 5, 241–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfinbarger, M. and Gilly, C.M. (2003) ‘eTailQ: Dimensionalising, measuring and predicting eTail quality’, Journal of Retailing, 79, 183–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, M. (1998) Burn Rate: How I Survived the Gold Rush Years on the Internet, Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R.B. (1980) ‘Feeling and thinking preferences need no inferences’, American Psychologist, 35, 151–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendices

APPENDIX A: ONLINE CBI [THE FIRST ORDER]

illustration

figure b

APPENDIX B: OFFLINE CBI [THE FIRST ORDER]

illustration

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Syed Alwi, S., Da Silva, R. Online and Offline Corporate Brand Images: Do They Differ?. Corp Reputation Rev 10, 217–244 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550056

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550056

Keywords

Navigation