Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamics of Currency Substitution, Asset Substitution and De facto Dollarisation and Euroisation in Transition Countries

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Comparative Economic Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents new evidence on the dynamics of dollarisation and euroisation for 25 transition countries. Estimates of the amount of foreign currency in circulation (FCC) in transition countries are used to develop a new comprehensive dollarisation index (CDI) and separate indices of currency substitution (CSI) and asset substitution. When the CDI is compared to the traditional dollarisation index that relies solely on foreign currency deposits as a proxy for the extent of dollarisation, I find that the comprehensive dollarisation measure provides a more complete picture of the extent of de facto dollarisation and euroisation, and that it better reflects the separate influences of currency substitution and asset substitution. I find that the dynamic evolution of currency substitution and asset substitution in transition countries is both more variable and complex than is usually believed to be the case. These new dollarisation indicators enable researchers to examine the causes of the dollarisation process and its tendency to lead to irreversibility (hysteresis). Moreover, the currency substitution and asset substitution indices shed light on the dynamic consequences of these processes for the effectiveness of monetary policy. Finally, the new estimates of FCC make possible the measurement of effective currency/deposit ratios that can be used to develop new estimates of the size and growth of underground economies in transition countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Earlier efforts by Feige et al. (2002) and Feige and Dean (2002) reported initial unadjusted point in time estimates of dollarisation in various countries.

  2. The currencies reported in the surveys of the Austrian National Bank include Austrian schillings (AST), Deutsch marks (DM) and Swiss Francs (SW) in addition to US dollar (US) holdings.

  3. These temporal estimates of FCC have been employed by Feige et al. (2003) to analyse the consequences of network externalities and the hysteresis problem for the case of Argentina, and in the study by Oomes (2003) for Russia.

  4. Feige et al. (2003) estimate that for Argentina, a shift from high dollarisation equilibrium to low-level dollarisation equilibrium would require a sustained 35% appreciation of the currency.

  5. A more detailed description of these data can be found in Feige (1996, 1997).

  6. The initial proxy included only inflows and outflows of $100 bills from the New York FED office that accounts for a substantial portion of the currency sent abroad.

  7. A proposal to the European Central Bank to monitor carefully the historic introduction of the Euro by setting up an ECI-type programme that would record the gross outflows and inflows of euros and returning legacy currencies from outside the EMU was ultimately rejected by the ECB. However, with the support of the IMF and the Croatian National Bank, a number of CEE central banks have undertaken independent efforts to survey their commercial banks in an effort to collect data on the amounts of euros in circulation.

  8. The author is indebted to the Austrian National Bank for providing its survey estimates.

  9. The appropriateness of this five-fold adjustment is confirmed by independent estimates of the amount of FCC in circulation in Croatia. The Croatian National Bank monitored flows of foreign currency into and out of the banking system during and after the Euro conversion process and estimated that the holdings of FCC in Euros was 3.1 billion (Kraft, 2002). A five-fold blow-up of the Austrian National Bank (ONB) survey estimate of non-dollar FCC holdings in Croatia yields a corresponding estimate 3.05 billion. These estimates are also within the range of indirect estimates of FCC in Croatia based on money demand and denomination displacement methods (Feige et al., 2003). Since Croatia is the only country for which the appropriateness of the blow-up factor could be independently tested, we employ the actual survey results without the blow-up factor for all CEE countries covered by the ONB survey.

  10. The data reported for Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovenia and the Slovak Republic include both dollar holdings and the holdings of European legacy currencies as estimated from survey data obtained from the Austrian Central Bank. These are the only countries for which independent estimates of European legacy currencies are available. The results reported for all other countries therefore include only estimated holdings of US dollars.

  11. Some foreign banknotes may be hoarded for long periods and might therefore be considered largely as a store of value. When the fraction of FCC that is in long-term hoards can be estimated, it should be treated as a store of value and included in the asset substitution index rather than the currency substitution index.

  12. When data on M2 and/or LTD are unavailable, but measures of QM are available, the ASI can be approximated by the ratio of FCD to total deposits, which equals LDD+QM. These two measures tend to be closely correlated. However, just as some FCC is used for hoards, some portion of FCD may be used for transactions purposes. Where this transaction component can be determined, the appropriate empirical treatment would be to include it in the CSI rather than the ASI.

  13. This analysis is contingent on the caveats mentioned in footnotes 11 & 12.

References

  • Baliño, T, Bennett, A and Borensztein, E . 1999: Monetary policy in dollarized economies. Occasional paper 171, International Monetary Fund: Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvo, GA and Végh, CA . 1992: Currency substitution in developing countries – an introduction. IMF Working paper WP/92/40, International Monetary Fund: Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, BM . 2000: ‘Here, Dollars, Dollars …’ estimating currency demand and worldwide currency substitution. International Finance Discussion paper no. 657, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System: Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilat, Y and Zinnes, C . 2002: The shadow economy in transition countries: friend or foe? A policy perspective. World Development 30(7): 1233–1254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feige, EL . 1990: Defining and estimating underground and informal economies: The new institutional economics approach. World Development 18(7): 989–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feige, EL . 1994: The underground economy and the currency enigma. Public Finance 49: 119–139. (Reprinted in Fiorentini, G and Zamagni, S (eds). The Economics of Corruption and Illegal Markets. International Library of Critical Writings in Economics, Edward Elgar, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feige, EL . 1996: Overseas holdings of US currency and the underground economy. In: Pozo, S (ed). Exploring the Underground Economy. W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research: Kalamazoo, Michigan 5–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feige, EL . 1997: Revised estimates of the size of the US underground economy: The implications of US currency held abroad. In: Lippert, O and Walker, M (eds). The Underground Economy: Global Evidence of its Size and Impact. Fraser Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

  • Feige, EL . 2002: Dollarization dynamics and the underground economy in twenty five transition countries. Presented at the International Conference on Unofficial Activities in Transition Countries: Ten Years of Experience, Institute of Public Finance, Zagreb, Croatia, 18–19 October 2002.

  • Feige, EL and Dean, JW . 2002: Dollarization and euroization in transition countries: Currency substitution, asset substitution, network externalities and irreversibility. Presented at Fordham University Conference on Euro and Dollarization: Forms of Monetary Union in Integrating Regions, 5–6 April 2002. In: Volbert, A, Mélitz, J and von Furstenberg, G (eds). Monetary Unions and Hard Pegs: Effects on Trade, Financial Development, and Stability. Oxford University Press: New York, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feige, EL, Faulend, M, Šonje, V and Šošić, V . 2002: Currency substitution, unofficial dollarisation and estimates of foreign currency held abroad: The case of Croatia. In: Blejer, M and Skreb, M (eds). Financial Policies in Emerging Markets. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feige, EL, Faulend, M, Šonje, V and Šošić, V . 2003: Unofficial dollarisation in Latin America: Currency substitution, network externalities and irreversibility. In: Dean, JW, Salvatore, D and Willett, TA (eds). The Dollarization Debate. Oxford University Press: New York. Forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S, Kaufmann, D and Shliefer, A . 1997: The unofficial economy in transition. Brookings Papers of Economic Activity 0(2): 159–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, D and Kaliberda, A . 1996: Integrating the unofficial economy into the dynamics of post-socialist economies: a framework of analysis and evidence. In: Kaminski, B. (ed), Economic Transition in the Newly Independent States. M.E. Sharpe Press, Armonk, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraft, E. 2002: Monetary policy under dollarization: The case of Croatia. The Eight Dubrovnik Conference; Croatian National Bank, 27–29 June, 2002.

  • Oomes, N . 2003: Network externalities and dollarization hysteresis: the case of Russia. IMF Working Paper No. 03/96, International monetary Fund: Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, R and Judson, R . 1996: The location of US currency: How much is abroad? Federal Reserve Bulletin 82, 883–903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seitz, F 1995: The circulation of Deutsche mark abroad. Economic Research Group of the Deutsche Bundesbank. Discussion paper no 1/95, Federal Republic of Germany: Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stix, H . 2001: Survey results about foreign currency holdings in five Central and Eastern European countries. CeSifo Forum, vol 3.

  • Šošić, V and Faulend, M . 2002: Dollarisation and the underground economy: Accidental partners? Institute of Public Finance: Zagreb, Croatia. October 2002.

  • United States Treasury Department. 2000: The use and counterfeiting of United States currency abroad. January 2000.

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Paul Wachtel and Vedran Šošić for helpful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feige, E. Dynamics of Currency Substitution, Asset Substitution and De facto Dollarisation and Euroisation in Transition Countries. Comp Econ Stud 45, 358–383 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ces.8100019

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ces.8100019

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation