Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Localized globalism: Compliance with and resistance to immigrant marginalization by Latino community-based organizations in a gateway city

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Latino Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Utilizing semi-structured field interview data, this article analyzes and compares two leading Latino community-based organizations (CBOs) in a small, old, civically active immigrant-based city in the Boston metropolitan area. Within contemporary global and national devolutionary contexts, the CBOs under study, one a service dispensing organization and the other a social action organization, are analyzed. Utilizing a Gramscian theoretical perspective, the dilemmas arising from their “nested” dialectical resistance to, and compliance with, “glocal” hegemonic forces marginalizing Latino immigrants are traced with respect to their organizational–structural features and functioning in the urban context. Thus, the service organization, in a largely successful effort to achieve financial and social autonomy, has developed bureaucratic structural features producing communication gaps and strains among its employees, as well as a work ethic threatening to “other” its clients. The more “horizontal” activist organization, while largely resistant to and combative with Latino immigrant marginalization, faces the dilemmas of its members’ multiple roles as activists, political figures and office holders, as well as those stemming from its embrace of the social capital idea. It is concluded that the current economic-financial crisis threatening the very existence of these CBOs offers them paradoxical advantages of critical awareness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. These include 14,014 “Other Hispanics or Latino,” followed by 4948 Puerto Ricans and 1698 Mexicans. Central Americans (El Salvadoreans, Guatemalans and Hondurans) most likely constitute a large share of the first category, not to mention the fact that undocumented people are not mentioned at all.

  2. A 2005 report by the Philanthropy and Environmental Justice Research Project at Northeastern University indicates that Chelsea is Massachusetts’ third most “environmentally over-burdened city” (Faber and Krieg, 2005, 50).

References

  • Alexander, V.D. 1998. Environmental Constraints and Organizational Strategies: Complexity, Conflict, and Coping in the Nonprofit Sector. In Private Action and the Public Good, eds. W.W. Powell and E.S. Clemens, 272–290. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S.G., Halter, A . and Gryzlak, B . 2002. When Social Program Responsibilities Trickle Down: Impacts of Devolution on Local Human Services. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare XXIX (2): 143–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. 2000. Grassroots Globalization and the Research Imagination. Public Culture 1 (1): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. 2002. Deep Democracy: Urban Governmentality and the Horizon of Politics. Public Culture 14 (1): 21–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnekov, T., Boyle, R . and Rich, D . 1989. Privatism and Urban Policy in Britain and the United States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. 1998. On Glocalization: Or Globalization for Some, Localization for Some Others. Thesis Eleven 54 (1): 37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becher, D. 2012. Political Moments with Long-Term Consequences. In Remaking Urban Citizenship: Organizations, Institutions, and the Right to the City: Comparative Urban and Community Research, eds. M.P. Smith and M. McQuarrie, 203–219. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloemraad, I. 2005. The Limits of de Tocqueville: How Government Facilitates Organizational Capacity in Newcomer Communities. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 31 (5): 865–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. 2000. The Urban Question as a Scale Question: Reflections on Henri Lefebvre, Urban Theory and the Politics of Scale. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 24 (2): 361–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castañeda, E. 2012. Urban Citizenship in New York, Paris, and Barcelona: Immigrant Organizations and the Right to Inhabit the City. In Remaking Urban Citizenship: Organizations, Institutions, and the Right to the City: Comparative Urban and Community Research, eds. M.P. Smith and M. McQuarrie, 57–78. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. 1997. The Power of Identity. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. 1999. Grassrooting the Space of Flows. Urban Geography 20 (4): 294–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. and Kreisler, H . 2001. Identity and Change in the Network Society: Conversations with Manuel Castells: Identity in the Network Society, http://globetrotter.berkeley.edu/people/Castells/cadstells-con5.html, accessed 14 January 2012.

  • Chelsea Collaborative. Undated. When a Thousand Threads are Brought Together, and Bound to Each Other … They Become a Strong Unbreakable, Rope. Pamphlet.

  • Clarke, S.E. 2000. Governance Tasks and Nonprofit Organizations. In Nonprofits in Urban America, eds. R.C. Hula and C. Jackson-Elmore Westport, CT: Quorum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conti, K. 2007. Power Plant Withdrawn, City Cheers. Boston Globe 18 November.

  • Cordero-Guzmán, H. 2005. Community-Based Organizations and Migration in New York City. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 31 (5): 889–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordero-Guzmán, H., Martin, N ., Quiroz-Becerra, V . and Theodore, N . 2008. Voting With Their Feet: Nonprofit Organizations and Immigrant Mobilization. American Behvioral Scientist 52 (4): 598–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, B. 2006. Diesel Plant Proposed for Chelsea. Boston Globe 1B: 3 July.

  • Danziger, S.K. 2010. The Decline of Cash Welfare and Implications for Social Policy and Poverty. Annual Review of Sociology 36: 523–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Graauw, E. 2007. Out of the Shadow of the State: Immigrant Political Nonprofits as Self-Motivated Political Actors in Urban Politics. Berkeley, CA: University of California. ISSC Fellows Working Papers.

  • De Graauw, E. 2008. Nonprofit Organizations: Agents of Immigrant Political Incorporation in Urban America. In Civic Hopes and Political Realities: Immigrants, Community Organizations, and Political Engagement, eds. S.K. Ramakrishnan and I. Bloemraad, 323–350. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. 1933. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faber, D.R. and Krieg, E.J. 2005. Unequal Exposure to Ecological Hazards 2005: Environmental Injustices in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Environmental Health Perspectives. Report. Boston, MA: Northeastern University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanon, F. 1963. The Wretched of the Earth. New York: Grove.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanon, F. 1967. Black Skin, White Masks. New York: Grove.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. 1970. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. 2003. A Formal Restatement of Durkheim’s “Division of Labor” Theory. Sociological Theory 21 (2): 103–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. New York: International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenlee, J.S. and Trussel, J.M. 2000. Predicting the Financial Vulnerability of Charitable Organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 11 (2): 199–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guarnizo, L.E. 2012. The Fluid, Multi-Scalar, and Contradictory Construction of Citizenship. In Remaking Urban Citizenship: Organizations, Institutions, and the Right to the City: Comparative Urban and Community Research, eds. M.P. Smith and M. McQuarrie 10, 11–35. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. 1997a. The Local and the Global: Globalization and Ethnicity. In Culture, Globalization and the World System: Contemporary Conditions for the Representation of Identity, ed. A.D. King, 19–39. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. 1997b. Old and New Identities: Old and New Ethnicities. In Culture, Globalization and the World System: Contemporary Conditions for the Representation of Identity, ed. A.D. King, 41–68. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holston, J. and Appadurai, A . 1996. Cities and Citizenship. Public Culture 8 (2): 187–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, C.-K.R. 2007. Immigrant Nonprofit Organizations in US Metropolitan Areas. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 36 (4): 707–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ives, P. 2004. Language and Hegemony in Gramsci. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, G. 1993a. History, Crisis, and Social Panic: Minority Resistance to Privatization of an Urban School System. The Urban Review 25 (3): 175–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, G. 1994. Why is Boston University Still in Chelsea? The New England Journal of Public Policy 10 (1): 179–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, G. 2002. Educational Grievance and Latino Mobilization: Chelsea. In Latino Politics in Massachusetts: Struggles, Strategies, and Prospects, eds. C. Hardy-Fanta and J.N. Gerson, 25–49. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansson, B.S. 2005. The Reluctant Welfare State: American Social Welfare Policies: Past, Present, and Future, 5th edn. Belmont, CA: ThomsonBrooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, J. 2001. Welfare Reform and Neighborhoods: Race and Civic Participation. Annals AAPSS 577 (1): 94–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasinitz, P., Mollenkopf, J . and Waters, M.C. 2002. Becoming American/Becoming New Yorkers: Immigrant Incorporation in a Majority Minority City. International Migration Review 36 (4): 1020–1036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopf, E. 1974. The Intimate City: A Study of Urban Order: Chelsea, Massachusetts, 1906–1915. PhD dissertation. Brandeis University.

  • Kopf, E. 1977. Untarnishing the Dream: Mobility, Opportunity, and Order in Modern America. Journal of Social History 11 (2): 206–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mannoni, O. 1964. Prospero and Caliban: The Psychology of Colonization. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marwell, N.P. 2004. Privatizing the Welfare State: Nonprofit Community-Based Organizations as Political Actors. American Sociological Review 69 (2): 265–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Memmi, A. 1965. The Colonizer and the Colonized. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumby, D.K. 1997. The Problem of Hegemony: Reading Gramsci for Organizational Communication Studies. Western Journal of Communication 61 (4): 343–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piven, F.F. 1998. Welfare and Work. Social Justice 25 (1): 67–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, D.L. 2003. Scaling Up CBOs for Second-Order Devolution in Welfare Reform. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 13 (4): 325–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, S., Park, S . and Simons, J . 2011. The Public Finance Crisis: Can Philanthropy Shoulder the Burden? New York: Changing Our World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Retamar, R.F. 2003. Todo Caliban. San Juan, PR: Ediciones CallejĂłn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynoso-Vallejo, H., Miranda, C . and Staples, L . 2009. Social Capital and Community Ortganizing among Low-Income Immigrants in Chelsea, Massachusetts. Enfoques y experiencias de acciĂłn comunitaria internacional, English MS of a book chapter published in ed. Ucar, X Barcelona, Spain: GraĂł.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G. 2003. Rethinking Globalization: Glocalization/Grobalization and Something/Nothing. Sociological Theory 21 (3): 193–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roudometof, V. 2005. Transnationalism, Cosmopolitanism and Glocalization. Current Sociology 53 (1): 113–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rueschemeyer, D. 1982. On Durkheim’s Explanation of the Division of Labor. The American Journal of Sociology 88 (3): 579–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanjek, R. 1998. The Future of Us All: Race and Neighborhood Politics in New York City. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. 2007. A Sociology of Globalization. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassoon, A.S. 1987. Gramsci’s Politics, 2nd edn. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, S., Mukai, R . and McAllister, G . 2011. Foundation Funding for Hispanics/Latinos in the United States and for Latin America. New York: The Foundation Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, R.M. 2009. Sandwiched between Patronage and Bureaucracy: The Plight of Citizen Participation in Community-Based Housing Organisations in the US. Urban Studies 46 (1): 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M.P. 2001. Transnational Urbanism: Locating Globalization. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M.P. and McQuarrie, M . 2012. Remaking Urban Citizenship. In Remaking Urban Citizenship: Organizations, Institutions, and the Right to the City: Comparative Urban and Community Studies, eds. M.P. Smith and M. McQuarrie, 103–10. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoecker, R. 2004. The Mystery of the Missing Social Capital and the Ghost of Social Structure: Why Community Development Can’t Win. In Community-Based Organizations: The Intersection of Social Capital and Local Context in Contemporary Urban Society, ed. R.M. Silverman, 53–66. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, M.C. 1995. Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review 20 (3): 571–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swingle, D.B. 2000. Immigrants and August 22, 1996: Will the Public Charge Rule Clarify Program Eligibility? Families in Society 81 (6): 605–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. 2004. Globalization or “Glocalisation”?: Networks, Territories and Rescaling. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 17 (1): 25–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Census Bureau. 2005–2009. American Community Survey. Chelsea City, Massachusetts.

  • Walker, E.T. and McCarthy, J.D. 2010. Legitimacy, Strategy, and Resources in the Survival of Community-Based Organizations. Social Problems 57 (3): 315–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. 1958. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, trans. Talcott Parsons New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wild, M. 2005. Street Meeting: Multiethnic Neighborhoods in Early Twentieth Century Los Angeles. Berkeley, CA: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Withorn, A. 2001. Friends or Foes? Nonprofits and the Puzzle of Welfare Reform. Annals AAPSS 577 (1): 107–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jacobs, G. Localized globalism: Compliance with and resistance to immigrant marginalization by Latino community-based organizations in a gateway city. Lat Stud 11, 501–526 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/lst.2013.30

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/lst.2013.30

Keywords

Navigation