Skip to main content
Log in

Unmasking the school re-zoning process: Race and class in a Northern Colorado community

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Latino Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 2007, the US Supreme Court struck down two student school assignment plans, one in Seattle and the other in Jefferson County, Kentucky, which specifically relied on racial classification. School districts can no longer use race-specific criteria to assign students to schools. Accordingly, school districts will have to use alternative methods to diversify their schools. Justice Anthony Kennedy, however, endorsed “race conscious” mechanisms that allow school districts to devise student attendance zones that encompass racially segregated neighborhoods, the building of new schools in mixed neighborhoods and the development of programs in order to integrate schools. We present a case study of a school district in northern Colorado that redrew its attendance zones because it constructed a new middle school in an affluent White neighborhood. We argue that school districts that seek to implement such plans will most likely be challenged, even where physical distance to schools does not present hardships for parents, and where minority and poverty rates are low enough to carry out such goals. School authorities need to be cognizant of the limits and possibilities of race-conscious economic integration plans, and mindful of their potential adverse effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, ___ US ___,127 S.Ct. 2738, 2768; 1268 L.Ed.2d 508; 75 USLW 4577 (2007). We will refer to this case as “PICS, 2007.”

  2. These schools included the Twin Peaks Academy, Mead Middle School, Longs Peak Middle School and Sunset Middle School.

  3. While these scenario titles do presume certain socio-economic results, they are, in general, an accurate reflection of the District Board of Education's general approach to and discussion of the re-zoning of the attendance zones at issue.

  4. District Board Policy JFBA-R includes language assuring parents that, in the event of a boundary change, students can enroll back to their schools for one remaining year.

  5. These schools included, in addition to Flagstaff Academy, Altona Middle School, which was comprised of 83 per cent White students, and Carbon Valley, which was comprised of 83 per cent White students.

  6. Kohn has commented on the pattern of predominantly White, middle-class parents of high-achieving students impeding school reforms that are carried out in the interests of all students, and identified three general areas where this takes place: instruction, placement and selection and sorting of students.

References

  • Bahrampour, T. 2004. Lines are Forming Battle Lines; Talk of Redistricting Arlington has Parents Worried about Friendships, Safety and Grades. The Washington Post, 21 October.

  • Baker, P. 1990. Tension Shadows Fairfax School Boundary Proposals. The Washington Post, 13 November.

  • Ball, M. 2001. Desire for Diversity in Schools is at Odds with Recent Rulings; Panel Says Race a Potential Factor in Drawing Boundaries. The Washington Post, 2 August.

  • Bonilla-Silva, E. 2001. White Supremacy & Racism in the Post-Civil Rights Era. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonilla-Silva, E. 2003a. Racism Without Racists: Color-blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in the United States. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonilla-Silva, E. 2003b. ‘New Racism,’ Color-blind Racism, and the Future of Whiteness in America. In White-out: The Continuing Significance of Racism, eds. Ashley W. Doane and Eduardo Bonilla-Silva, 271–284. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett, J. 2000. Redistricting won’t Consider Student Moves; Sandy Spring Parents Sued Board Last Year, Claiming Race Influenced Attendance Lines. The Atlanta Journal and Constitution, 19 October.

  • Ciolfi, A. and J.E. Ryan . 2008. Socioeconomic Integration: It's Legal, and it Makes Sense. Education Week, 18 June.

  • Creighton, R.L. and D.M. Hamlin . 1995. Crossing the Redistricting Minefield. School Administrator 52: 18–22 (Accession Number: EJ499121).

    Google Scholar 

  • Creighton, R.L. and A.J. Irwin . 1994. When New Boundaries Abound: A Systematic Approach to Redistricting. School Business Affairs 60: 13–16 (Accession Number: EJ483394).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gewertz, C. 2008. Louisville District Unveils New Student-Assignment Plan. Education Week, 6 February.

  • Gladych, P.A. 2004. School Zoning Causes Friction. Longmont Daily Times-Call, 1 December: B1.

  • Gladych, P.A. 2005a. School Talks May Cross Line. Longmont Daily Times-Call, 12 January: A1.

  • Gladych, P.A. 2005b. School Board Packs Them in. Longmont Daily Times-Call, 13 January: A1.

  • Gladych, P.A. 2005c. Heritage Border Set. Longmont Daily Times-Call, 27 January: A1–A4.

  • Gladych, P.A. and M. Sidwell . 2005. School Colors. Longmont Daily Times-Call, 26 January: B1–B2.

  • Hardy, L. 2006. The New Integration: Will Focusing on Socioeconomic Status in School Enrollment Raise Achievement? The American School Board Journal 193 (4): 46–50. www.asbj.com/specialreports/0406SpecialReports/S1.html, accession number: 200609104586012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, T.F. 1989. Seven Factors You’d Better Not Forget When Changing Attendance Boundaries. The American School Board Journal 176: 29–30 (Accession number: 196712108899009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahlenberg, R. 2000a. Mixing Classes: Why Economic Desegregation Holds the Key to School Reform. Washington Monthly, December: 4.

  • Kahlenberg, R. 2000b. Socioeconomic Integration: A Promising Alternative. Principal 79: 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahlenberg, R. 2001. All Together Now: Creating Middle-Class Schools through Public School Choice. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution Press, 251–254; Also see Teachers College Record (16 July 2007). http://www.tcrecord.org, accessed on 17 July 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahlenberg, R. 2006. The new Integration. Educational Leaders 63(8): 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, A. 2007. Only for My Kid. Phi Delta Kappan, April 1998. http://www.alfiekohn.org/articles.htm#null.

  • Linn, R.L. and K.G. Welner . 2007. Race-Conscious Policies for Assigning Students to Schools: Social Science Research and the Supreme Court Cases, National Academy of Education Committee on Social Science Research Evidence on Racial Diversity in Schools. Washington DC: National Academy of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Open Forum. 2005a. What Ever Happened to Quality Education? Longmont Daily Times-Call, 19 January: A4.

  • Open Forum. 2005b. Diversity is Important to All Students. Longmont Daily Times-Call, 19 January: A4.

  • Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, ___ U.S. ___,127 S.Ct. 2738, 2768; 1268 L.Ed.2d 508; 75 USLW 4577 (2007).

  • Reardon, S.F., J.T. Yun and M. Kurlaender . 2006. Implications of Income-Based School Assignment Policies for Racial School Segregation. Educational. Evaluation & Policy Analysis 28: 49–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieger, B. 1994. Where to Draw the Line: Don’t Draw Blood Over Redrawing Attendance Boundaries. The American School Board Journal 181: 35–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieger, B. 1995. Boundary Realignment in the Eye of the Storm. School Administrator 52: 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, K. 2004. At Crossroads of Unrest, a Turn Toward Harmony. Denver Post, 19 August. http://www.denverpost.com/portlet/article/html.

  • St. Vrain Valley Board of Education. 2004a. Minutes of the Regular Board Meeting. 27 October.

  • St. Vrain Valley Board of Education. 2004b. Public Participation at Board Meetings. Policy BEDH.

  • St. Vrain Valley Board of Education. 2004c. Open Enrollment. Policy JFBA-R.

  • St. Vrain Valley Board of Education. 2005a. Minutes of the Regular Board Meeting. 12 January.

  • St. Vrain Valley Board of Education. 2005b. Minutes of the Regular Board Meeting. 26 January.

  • St. Vrain Valley Board of Education. 2005c. Minutes of the Regular Board Meeting. 9 February.

  • St. Vrain Valley School District. 2004a. Middle School Boundary – Community Conversations.

  • St. Vrain Valley School District. 2004b. Working Document entitled “Middle School Boundaries”.

  • St. Vrain Valley School District. 2004c. Official October Count Statistics, http:///www.stvrain.k12.co.us/Home/Publicinformation/Count/Count%202004/table_04.htm, accessed 25 April 2006.

  • St. Vrain Valley School District. 2005. Official October Count Statistics, http://www.stvrain.k12.co.us/Home?Publicinformation/Count/2005/index.html, accessed 25 April 2006.

  • Valencia, R. and M. Black . 2002. “Mexican Americans don’t Value Education!” On the Basis of the Myth, Mythmaking, and Debunking. Journal of Latinos and Education 1: 81–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, T. 2001. Class Assignment. Can Socioeconomic Diversity Restore the Promise of School Integration. Teaching Tolerance, (20): 34–40.

  • Walsh, M. 2007. Districts Face Uncertainty in Maintaining Racially Diverse Schools. Education Week. http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2007, accessed 3 July 2007.

  • Zila, R. 2004. Memorandum to the St. Vrain Valley School District Board of Education. 27 October.

  • Zila, R. 2005a. Memorandum to the St. Vrain Valley School District Board of Education. 12 January.

  • Zila, R. 2005b. Approval of Middle School #7 Boundary. Memorandum to St. Vrain Valley School District Board of Education, 26 January.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the comments and criticism from Benjamin Kirshner, Margoret Lecompte, Jarrod Hanson and Darrel Jackson.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bradley Bartels or Rubén Donato.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bartels, B., Donato, R. Unmasking the school re-zoning process: Race and class in a Northern Colorado community. Lat Stud 7, 222–249 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/lst.2009.9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/lst.2009.9

Keywords

Navigation