Skip to main content
Log in

Process evaluation of implementing knowledge management tools in public health

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Knowledge Management Research & Practice

Abstract

Translating formal and informal knowledge into public health (PH) action is essential given that PH professionals rely on up-to-date and context-specific information for effective programme planning, implementation, and evaluation. Knowledge management (KM) provides possible solutions to this challenge. We conducted an evaluation of a pilot implementation of four KM tools: (1) After Action Review; (2) Communities of Practice; (3) Peer Assist and; (4) Organizational Yellow Pages. The evaluation focused on fidelity, feasibility, and acceptability of the tools. Three main messages emerged from the study findings: (1) KM tools can be implemented in a PH context for the sharing of explicit and tacit knowledge, (2) enabling organizational environments were important for implementation, and (3) the provision of a facilitator during the implementation period was also important and appreciated by study participants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akhavan P, Jafari M and Fathian M (2006) Critical success factors of knowledge management systems: a multi-case analysis. European Business Review 18(2), 97–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alavi M, Kayworth TR and Leidner DE (2005) An empirical examination of the influence of organizational culture on knowledge management practices. Journal of Management Information Systems 22(3), 191–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Association of State and Territorial Health Officials (2011) Knowledge management for public health professionals. Available at: [WWW document] http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/eh/local/knowproj/resources.html (accessed 28 February 2012).

  • Baumbusch JL et al (2008) Pursuing common agendas: a collaborative model for knowledge translation between research and practice in clinical settings. Research in Nursing and Health 31(2), 130–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen S and Martens P (2005) The need to know team. Demystifying knowledge translation: learning from the community. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 10(4), 203–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burley DL and Pandit G (2008) Lesson learned: organizational realities influence KMS implementation. VINE: The Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems 38(4), 476–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canadian International Development Agency (2003) Knowledge sharing: Methods, meeting and tools. Available at: [WWW document] http://api.ning.com/files/qFYbh7-nR-NtYA74oSDvLd1PPYbZYXXgzaDL*QjNHgn73o3VF5bcnqhubQKS0X93SkfRnhUpvWdPgUDxFrvdbvd7*rnGKMkt (accessed 04 January 2015).

  • Ciliska D, Thomas H and Buffet C (2012) A compendium of critical appraisal tools for public health practice (Revised). Available at: [WWW document] http://www.nccmt.ca/pubs/CompendiumToolENG.pdf (accessed 28 February 2012).

  • Claver-Cortés E, Zaragoza-Sáez P and Pertusa-Ortega E (2007) Organizational structure features supporting knowledge management processes. Journal of Knowledge Management 11(4), 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig P et al (2008) Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. British Medical Journal 337, a1655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards JS, Hall MJ and Shaw D (2005) Proposing a systems vision of knowledge management in emergency care. Journal of the Operational Research Society 56(2005), 180–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faul M and Camacho K (2004) Knowledge sharing toolkit. Available at: [WWW document] http://www.asksource.info/resources/knowledge-sharing-toolkit-evolving-collection-practical-knowledge-sharing-techniques (accessed 04 January 2015).

  • Graham I and Tetroe J (2007) KT theories research group. Some theoretical underpinnings of knowledge translation. Academic Emergency Medicine 14(11), 936–941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham ID and Tetroe J (2007) How to translate health research knowledge into effective healthcare action. Healthcare Quarterly 10(3), 20–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey G et al (2002) Getting evidence into practice: the role and function of facilitation. Journal of Advanced Nursing 37(6), 577–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He W, Fang Y and Wei K (2009) The role of trust in promoting organizational knowledge seeking using knowledge management systems: an empirical investigation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology 60(3), 526–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson N, Butterill D and Goering P (2003) Development of a framework for knowledge translation: understanding user context. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 8(2), 94–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kothari AR, Bickford JJ, Edwards N, Dobbins MJ and Meyer M (2011) Uncovering tacit knowledge: a pilot study to broaden the concept of knowledge in knowledge translation. BMC Health Services Research 11(1), 198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kothari A, Edwards N, Hamel N and Judd M (2009) Is research working for you? Validating a tool to examine the capacity of health organizations to use research. Implementation Science 4(1), 46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kothari A, Hovanec N, Hastie R and Sibbald S (2011) Lessons from the business sector for successful knowledge management in health care. A systematic review. 11(1), 1–50.

  • Macdonald MA (1998) Reconciling Concept and Context: A Grounded Theory Study of Implementing School-Based Health Promotion. The University of British Columbia, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliam CL et al (2008) Accelerating client-driven care: pilot study for a social interaction approach to knowledge translation. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research 40(2), 58–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monavvarian A and Kasaei M (2007) A KM model for public administration: the case of labour ministry. VINE: The Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems 37(3), 348–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nayir DZ and Uzunçarşili Ü (2008) A cultural perspective on knowledge management: the success story of Sarkuysan company. Journal of Knowledge Management 12(2), 141–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton MS and Scott-Findlay S (2007) Taking stock of current societal, political and academic stakeholders in the Canadian healthcare knowledge translation agenda. Implementation Science 2(1), 32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolini D, Powell J, Conville P and Martinez-Solano L (2008) Managing knowledge in the healthcare sector. A review. International Journal of Management Reviews 10(3), 245–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orzano AJ et al (2009) A medical home: value and implications of knowledge management. Health Care Management Review 34(3), 224–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton MQ (1987) How to Use Qualitative Methods in Evaluation. SAGE Publications, Newbury Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton MQ (Eds) (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3rd edn, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson HS, Carrillo PM, Anumba CJ and Al-Ghassani A (2004) Developing a business case for knowledge management: the IMPaKT approach. Construction Management and Economics 22(7), 733–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders RP, Evans MH and Joshi P (2005) Developing a process-evaluation plan for assessing health promotion program implementation: a how-to guide. Health Promotion Practice 6(2), 134–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidler-de Alwis R and Hartmann E (2008) The use of tacit knowledge within innovative companies: knowledge management in innovative enterprises. Journal of Knowledge Management 12(1), 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steckler A and Linnan L (2002) Process Evaluation for Public Health Interventions and Research, 1st edn, Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint, San Francisco, CA.

  • Symon G and Cassell C (1998) Qualitative Methods and Analysis in Organizational Research a Practical Guide. SAGE Publications, London, England; Thousand Oaks, CA; New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulchinsky TH, Varavikova EA and Last J (2009) The New Public Health, 2nd edn, Elsevier, United States of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young R (2010) Knowledge Management Tools and Techniques Manual. Tokyo, Asian Productivity Organization.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anita Kothari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kothari, A., Hovanec, N., Sibbald, S. et al. Process evaluation of implementing knowledge management tools in public health. Knowl Manage Res Pract 14, 401–411 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2015.4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2015.4

Keywords

Navigation