Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Web 2.0 and the shift in corporate governance from control to democracy

  • Article
  • Published:
Knowledge Management Research & Practice

Abstract

This paper discusses the adoption of web 2.0 technologies to enhance knowledge flows within and across companies. Its original contribution is to explore how corporate governance models influence the use of web 2.0 tools for knowledge sharing. The knowledge management literature is revisited to understand how social mechanisms determine the use of technologies in corporate environments. This review is followed by a synthetic view on web 2.0 technologies and their use in business. The paper concludes that the potential of web 2.0 technologies to foster collaboration depends on corporate governance structures that companies establish for decision making. The empowerment of employees is a necessary precondition for successfully implementing web 2.0-based information systems. Recommendations are given to change governance structures and to create liberal work cultures that foster the use of web 2.0 for knowledge sharing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackoff RL (1996) On learning and the systems that facilitate it. Center for Quality of Management Journal 5 (2), 27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alavi M and Leidner D (2001) Knowledge management and knowledge management systems, conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly 25 (1), 107–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht D, Arnold R and Bauerfeld W (2007) Web 2.0: Strategievorschläge zur Stärkung von Bildung und Innovation in Deutschland – Bericht der Expertenkommission Bildung mit neuen Medien. Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF), Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansoff I (1965) Corporate Strategy. Penguin, Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C (1998) Empowerment: the emperor's new clothes. Harvard Business Review 76 (3), 98–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes NG and Mattson E (2008) Social media in the Inc. 500: the first longitudinal study. [WWW document] http://www.umassd.edu/cmr/studiesresearch/blogstudy5.pdf (accessed 11 November 2008).

  • Barney J (1999) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17 (1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berners-Lee T, Hendler J and Lassila O (2001) The semantic web. Scientific American 284, 34–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjelland OM and Wood RC (2008) An inside view of IBM's ‘innovation jam’. MIT Sloan Management Review 50 (1), 32–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brechbühl H (2007) Web 2.0 and the corporation – thought leadership roundtable on digital strategies. [WWW document] http://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/digital/Programs/CorporateEvents/Web/Overview (accessed 26 May 2008).

  • Brynjolfsson E and McAfee A (2007) Beyond enterprise. In special report: the future of the web. MIT Sloan Management Review 48 (3), 50–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bughin J and Manyika J (2007) How Businesses are Using Web 2.0: A McKinsey Global Survey. McKinsey and Company, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bughin J and Manyika J (2008) Building the Web 2.0 Enterprise: McKinsey Global Survey Results. McKinsey and Company, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough HW (2003) Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler AD (1980) Managerial Hierarchies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman CW (1972) The Design of Inquiring Systems: Basic Concepts of Systems and Organizations. Bencis Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi M (1990) Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport T (2005) Thinking for a Living. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport T and Prusak L (1998) Working Knowledge. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downes S (2007) Web 2.0 and your own learning and development. [WWW document] http://www.downes.ca/ (accessed 12.11.2007).

  • Drucker PF (1992) The new society of organizations. Harvard Business Review 70 (5), 95–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker PF (1999) Management Challenges of the 21st Century. HarperBusiness, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker PF (1995a) Managing in a Time of Great Change. Truman Talley Books/ Dutton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker PF (1995b) The information executives truly need. Harvard Business Review 73 (1), 54–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker PF (2005) Managing oneself. Harvard Business Review 83 (1), 100–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson AC (2008) The competitive imperative of learning. HBS centennial issue. Harvard Business Review 86 (7/8), 60–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edvinsson L and Malone MS (1997) Intellectual Capital: Realizing your Company's True Value by Finding its Hidden Brainpower. HarperBusiness, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frappaolo C and Keldsen D (2008) Enterprise 2.0: Agile, Emergent and Integrated. AIIM, Silver Spring, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman L (2005) The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter M (1983) The strength of weak ties – a network theory revisited. Sociological Theory 1, 201–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17 (4), 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel G (1996) Strategy as revolution. Harvard Business Review 74 (4), 69–76.

  • Hamel G (2007) The Future of Management. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen MT, Nohria N and Kierney T (1999) What's your strategy for managing knowledge? Harvard Business Review 77 (2), 109–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hass BH, Walsh G and Kilian T (2007) Web 2.0 – Neue Perspektiven für Marketing und Medien. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauschild S, Licht T and Stein W (2001) Creating a knowledge culture. The McKinsey Quarterly 2001 (1), 74–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek FA (1945) The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review 35 (4), 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertel G, Niedner S and Herrmann S (2003) Motivation of software developers in open source projects: an internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel. Research Policy 32 (7), 1159–1177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks R, Dattero R and Galup S (2006) The five-tier knowledge management hierarchy. Journal of Knowledge Management 10 (1), 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kakabadse NK, Kakabadse A and Kouzmin A (2003) Reviewing the knowledge management literature: towards a taxonomy. Journal of Knowledge Management 7 (4), 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerres M (2006) Web 2.0 und seine Implikationen für E-Learning. [WWW document] http://mediendidaktik.uni-duisburg-essen.de/web20 (accessed 03.10.2007).

  • Kim WC and Mauborgne R (2003) Fair process: managing in the knowledge economy. Harvard Business Review 81 (1), 127–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut B and Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science 3 (3), 383–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut B and Zander U (1996) What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organization Science 7 (5), 502–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machlup F (1962) Knowledge Production and Distribution in the United States. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone TW (2004) The Future of Work: How the New Order of Business Will Shape Your Organization, Your Management Style and Your Life. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAfee A (2006) Enterprise 2.0: the dawn of emergent collaboration. MIT Sloan Review 47 (3), 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan M, Fiore Q and Agel J (2003) The Medium is the Massage: An Inventory of Effects. HardWired, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H (1987) Crafting strategy. Harvard Business Review 65 (4), 66–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H (1998) The structuring of organizations. In The Strategy Reader (SEGAL-HORN S, Ed), pp 238–266, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musser J and O’Reilly T (2006) Web 2.0 – Principles and Best Practices. O’Reilly Media Inc., Sebastopol, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science 5 (1), 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I and Konno N (1998) The concept of ‘Ba’, building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review 40 (3), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly T (2005) What is web 2.0 – design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. [WWW document] http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html (accessed 12 October 2005).

  • Polanyi M (1966) The Tacit Dimension. Doubleday Anchor, Garden City, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter M (1985) Competitive Advantage. Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter M (1996) What is strategy. Harvard Business Review 74 (6), 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad CK and Hamel G (1990) The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review 68 (3), 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaller RR (1997) Moore's law: past, present and future. Spectrum 34 (6), 52–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneckenberg D (2008) Educating Tomorrow's Knowledge Workers. Eburon Academic Publishers, Delft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seufert S (2007) ‘Ne(x)t generation learning’ – was gibt es Neues über das Lernen? In ‘Ne(x)t Generation Learning’: Wikis, Blogs, Mediacasts & Co. – Social Software und Personal Broadcasting auf der Spur (SEUFERT S and BRAHM T, Eds), pp 2–19, Universität St. Gallen, St. Gallen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith A (1776) An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Modern Library, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Switzer C (2008) Time for change: empowering organizations to succeed in the knowledge economy. Journal of Knowledge Management 12 (2), 18–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsui E (2003) Tracking the role and evolution of commercial knowledge management software. In Handbook on Knowledge Management – Volume 2: Knowledge Directions (HOLSAPPLE CW, Ed), pp 5–27, Springer, Berlin.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB and Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27 (3), 425–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel E and von Krogh G (2003) The private–collective innovation model in open source software development. Organization Science 14 (2), 209–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger D (2007) Special report: the future of the web. MIT Sloan Management Review 48 (3), 51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E, McDermott R and Snyder W (2002) Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ESC Rennes School of Business, 2, rue Robert d'Arbrissel, Rennes, Bretagne, France

    Dirk Schneckenberg

Authors
  1. Dirk Schneckenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dirk Schneckenberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schneckenberg, D. Web 2.0 and the shift in corporate governance from control to democracy. Knowl Manage Res Pract 7, 234–248 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2009.17

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2009.17

Keywords

Search

Navigation