Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A note on the square root law for urban police travel times

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

The classical Square Root Law formula for emergency travel times consists of one observable component, the density of patrol coverage, and one unknown component that must be estimated empirically, the effective travel speed. The effective travel speed is typically assumed to be an empirical constant. We test whether this simplifying assumption is justified empirically. We propose a modern machine-learning approach and a Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression to incorporate into a travel speed model various exogenous factors such as call type, incident location, weather conditions and traffic congestion. The value of the proposed analytical approach and some practical implications are demonstrated using operational data from a large urban police jurisdiction based in British Columbia, Canada. Although the analysis is framed within the context of urban emergency police operations, the proposed approach has the potential to be useful for other emergency services or roving business units that deal with unscheduled service calls.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The other five topics were computerized information systems, effectiveness measures for crime prevention programs, other measures of police effectiveness, promotional standards for sworn officers, and surveys of public attitudes towards police.

References

  • Anklam C, Kirby A, Sharevski F and Dietz JE (2015). Mitigating active shooter impact: Analysis for policy options based on agent/computer-based modeling. Journal of Emergency Management 13 (3): 201–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antunes G and Scott EJ (1981). Calling the cops: Police telephone operators and citizen calls for service. Journal of Criminal Justice 9 (2): 165–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bialik C (2012). The fire countdown clock. The Wall Street Journal.

  • Bialik C (2013). Detroit police response times no guide to effectiveness. The Wall Street Journal.

  • Blackwell TH and Kaufman JS (2002). Response time effectiveness: Comparison of response time and survival in an urban emergency medical services system. Academic Emergency Medicine 9 (4): 288–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard IE et al (2011). Emergency medical services response time and mortality in an urban setting. Prehospital Emergency Care 16 (1): 142–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandl SG and Horvath F (1991). Crime-victim evaluation of police investigative performance. Journal of Criminal Justice 19 (2): 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratton WJ (2006). Research: A practitioner’s perspective, from the streets. Western Criminology Review 7 (3): 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratton WJ and Malinowski SW (2008). Police performance man-agement in practice: Taking COMPSTAT to the next level. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice 2 (3): 259–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown K and Coulter PB (1983). Subjective and objective measures of police service delivery. Public Administration Review 43 (1): 50–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahn MF and Tien JM (1981). An evaluation report of an alternative approach in police response: The Wilmington management of demand program. Technical Report. Public Systems Evaluation.

  • Chaiken JM (1975). Patrol allocation methodology for police departments. Technical Report. RAND Corporation.

  • Chaiken JM and Dormont P (1978). A patrol car allocation model: Capabilities and algorithms. Management Science 24 (12): 1291–1300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherkassky V and Ma Y (2004). Practical selection of SVM parameters and noise estimation for SVM regression. Neural Networks 17 (1): 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cihan A, Zhang Y and Hoover L (2012). Police response time to in-progress burglary: A multilevel analysis. Police Quarterly 15 (3): 308–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clawson C and Chang SK (1977). Relationship of response delays and arrest rates. Journal of Police Science and Administration 5 (1): 53–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coupe RT and Blake L (2005). The effects of patrol workloads and response strength on arrests at burglary emergencies. Journal of Criminal Justice 33 (3): 239–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis EA, McCrorry J and Mosesso VN (1999). Institution of a police automated external defibrillation program: Concepts and practice. Prehospital Emergency Care 3 (1): 60–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demers S, Palmer A and Griffiths CT (2007). Vancouver Police Department Patrol Deployment Study. Vancouver Police Department: British Columbia, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eck JE and Spelman W (1987). Who ya gonna call? The police as problem-busters. Crime & Delinquency 33 (1): 31–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg MS, Bergner L and Hallstrom A (1979). Cardiac resuscitation in the community: Importance of rapid provision and implications for program planning. Journal of the American Medical Association 241 (18): 1905–1907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisinger P (2014). Is Detroit dead? Journal of Urban Affairs 36 (1): 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer MT (1981). Differential police response strategies. Technical Report. Police Executive Research Forum.

  • Frank J, Smith BW and Novak KJ (2005). Exploring the basis of citizens’ attitudes toward the police. Police Quarterly 8 (2): 206–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman J, Hastie T and Tibshirani R (2010). Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. Journal of Statistical Software 33 (1): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furstenberg Jr FF and Wellford CF (1973). Calling the police: The evaluation of police service. Law & Society Review 7 (3): 393–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fyffe DE and Rardin RL (1974). An evaluation of policy-related research in fire protection service management. Technical Report, Georgia Institute of Technology.

  • Gallagher DJ (2014). Police Response Time Performance Audit. Auditor of the City and County of Denver: Denver, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass SI, Cramer HL, Knoppers BA, Dawson JM, Jakubiak S and Strasel H (1974). Reviews and critical discussions of policy-related research in the field of police protection. Technical Report. Mathematica.

  • Griffiths CT and Pollard N (2013). Policing in Winnipeg: An Operational Review. Canadian Police Association: Manitoba, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths CT, Pollard N and Stamatakis T (2015). Assessing the effectiveness and efficiency of a police service: The analytics of operational reviews. Police Practice and Research: An International Journal 16 (2): 175–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausner J (1975). Determining the travel characteristics of emergency service vehicles. Technical Report. RAND Corporation.

  • Hirschel D, Lumb R and Johnson R (1998). Victim assessment of the police response to burglary: The relative effects of incident, police action, outcome and demographic variables on citizen satisfaction. Police Quarterly 1 (4): 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ignall EJ, Kolesar P and Walker WE (1978). Using simulation to develop and validate analytic models: Some case studies. Operations Research 26 (2): 237–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis JP (1975). Optimization in stochastic service systems with distinguishable servers. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Cambridge, MA.

  • Karatzoglou A, Smola A, Hornik K and Zeileis A (2004). Kernlab—An S4 package for kernel methods in R. Journal of Statistical Software 11 (9): 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelling GL (1978). Police field services and crime: The presumed effects of a capacity. Crime & Delinquency 24 (2): 173–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiedrowski J, Petrunik M, Macdonald T and Melchers R (2013). Canadian police board views on the use of police performance metrics. Technical Report. Compliance Strategy Group.

  • Kimerer C et al (2007). Seattle Police Department Neighborhood Policing Staffing Plan 2008-2012. Seattle Police Department: Seattle, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk MV (1978). Response time analysis, volume 2: Analysis. Technical Report. U.S. Department of Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration.

  • Kolesar P and Blum EH (1973). Square root laws for fire engine response distances. Management Science 19 (12): 1368–1378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolesar P and Walker W (1974). Measuring the travel characteristics of New York City’s fire companies. Technical Report. RAND Corporation.

  • Larson RC (1972). Urban Police Patrol Analysis. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson RC and Cahn MF (1985). Synthesizing and extending the results of police patrol studies. Technical Report. National Institute of Justice.

  • Larson RC and Odoni AR (1981). Urban Operations Research. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEwen JT, Connors EF and Cohen MI (1986). Evaluation of the differential police response field test. Technical Report. National Institute of Justice.

  • Myerburg RJ et al (2002). Impact of community-wide police car deployment of automated external defibrillators on survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation 106 (9): 1058–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pate T, Ferrara A, Bowers RA and Lorence J (1976). Police response time: Its determinants and effects. Technical Report. Police Foundation.

  • Peak K and Barthe EP (2009). Community policing and COMPSTAT: Merged, or mutually exclusive? The Police Chief LXXVI (12): 72–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Percy SL (1980). Response time and citizen evaluation of police. Journal of Police Science and Administration 8 (1): 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pons PT, Haukoos JS, Bludworth W, Cribley T, Pons KA and Markovchick VJ (2005). Paramedic response time: Does it affect patient survival? Academic Emergency Medicine 12 (7): 594–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priest TB and Carter DB (1999). Evaluations of police performance in an African American sample. Journal of Criminal Justice 27 (5): 457–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rashbaum WK (2002). Response time to police calls is 29% faster. The New York Times.

  • Richardson-Foster H, Stanley N, Miller P and Thomson G (2012). Police intervention in domestic violence incidents where children are present: Police and children’s perspectives. Policing and Society: An International Journal of Research and Policy 22 (2): 220–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein J (1973). City Police. Hill and Wang: New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid V and Doerner KF (2010). Ambulance location and relocation problems with time-dependent travel times. European Journal of Operational Research 207 (3): 1293–1303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skogan WG (2005). Citizen satisfaction with police encounters. Police Quarterly 8 (3): 298–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith HR (1970). Time to die from injuries received in road traffic accidents. Injury 2 (2): 99–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smola AJ and Schlkopf B (2004). A tutorial on support vector regression. Statistics and Computing 14 (3): 199–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spelman W and Brown DK (1984). Calling the police—Citizen reporting of serious crime. Technical Report. National Institute of Justice.

  • Steadman HJ, Deane MW, Borum R and Morrissey JP (2000). Comparing outcomes of major models of police responses to mental health emergencies. Psychiatric Services 51 (5): 645–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens JM, Webster TC and Stipak B (1980). Response time: Role in assessing police performance. Public Productivity Review 4 (3): 210–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiell IG et al (1999). Modifiable factors associated with improved cardiac arrest survival in a multicenter basic life support/defibrillation system: OPALS study phase I results. Annals of Emergency Medicine 33 (1): 44–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tewksbury R and West A (2001). Crime victims’ satisfaction with police services: An assessment in one urban community. The Justice Professional 14 (4): 271–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorndyke B (2015). Police response time to domestic violence calls and its effects. Master’s thesis, Boise State University: Boise, ID.

  • Tibshirani R et al (2010). Strong rules for discarding predictors in lasso-type problems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 74 (2): 245–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vapnik V (1995). The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer-Verlag: New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vidal J and Kirchmaier T (2015). The effect of police response time on crime detection. Unpublished manuscript, http://personal.lse.ac.uk/BLANESIV/DetectedResponse.pdf.

  • Walker S (1984). Broken windows and fractured history: The use and misuse of history in recent police patrol analysis. Justice Quarterly 1 (1): 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd D and Eck JE (2004). What can police do to reduce crime disorder, and fear? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 593 (1): 42–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf ME, Ly U, Hobart MA and Kernic MA (2003). Barriers to seeking police help for intimate partner violence. Journal of Family Violence 18 (2): 121–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research assistance provided by Alex Eastwood and Correen Yedon is gratefully acknowledged. The authors are also appreciative of the insightful feedback and suggestions provided by Tim Szkopek-Szkopowski and two anonymous referees on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vancouver Police Department, Vancouver, Canada

    Simon Demers & Cynthia Langan

Authors
  1. Simon Demers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cynthia Langan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Demers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Demers, S., Langan, C. A note on the square root law for urban police travel times. J Oper Res Soc 67, 989–1000 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2015.124

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2015.124

Keywords

Search

Navigation