Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Causal study of low stakeholder engagement in healthcare simulation projects

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

Stakeholder engagement plays a fundamental role in the success of ‘operational research’ initiatives including simulation projects. However, there is little empirical evidence of real engagement in the context of healthcare simulation. This paper principally examines this issue and aims to provide insights into the possible causes. The paper reports on the results of a literature review and 10 field studies within the UK healthcare settings, supplemented with the authors’ experience in order to arrive at an initial list of the causes, which will then be tested through a survey of expert opinions. Twelve primary and 26 secondary causal factors, which received statistically significant level of agreement from the experts, are presented in a fish-bone diagram. The findings indicate that communication gap between simulation and stakeholder groups is the top primary factor contributing the most to the poor stakeholder engagement in healthcare simulation projects, followed by ‘poor management support’, ‘clinician’s high workload’ and ‘failure in producing tangible and quick results’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brailsford S (2005). Overcoming the barriers to implementation of operations research simulation models in healthcare. Clinical and Investigative Medicine 28 (6): 312–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brailsford SC, Bolt T, Connell C, Klein JH and Patel B (2009a). Stakeholder engagement in health care simulation. In: Rossetti MD, Hill RR, Johansson B, Dunkin A and Ingalls RG (eds). Proceedings of the 2009 Winter Simulation Conference, IEEE; Austin, TX, pp 1840–1849.

  • Brailsford SC, Harper PR, Pitt M and Patel B (2009b). An analysis of the academic literature on simulation and modelling in healthcare. Journal of Simulation 3 (3): 130–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coughlan J, Eatock J and Patel N (2011). Simulating the use of re-prioritisation as a wait-reduction strategy in an emergency department. Emergency Medicine Journal 28 (12): 1013–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Den Hengst M and De Vreede G (2004). Collaborative business engineering: A decade of lessons from the field. Journal of Management Information Systems 20 (4): 85–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldabi T (2009). Implementation issues of modeling healthcare problems: Misconceptions and lessons. In: Rossetti MD, Hill RR, Johansson B, Dunkin A and Ingalls RG (eds). Proceedings of the 2009 Winter Simulation Conference, IEEE; Austin, TX, pp 1831-1839.

  • Eldabi T, Lacey P, Naseer A and Jahangirian M (2011). Integrated care development using systems modelling—A case study of intermediate care. In: Jain S, Creasey RR, Himmelspach J, White KP and Fu M (eds). Proceedings of the 2011 Winter Simulation Conference, IEEE; Phoenix, AZ, pp 3037-3047.

  • Eskinasi M and Fokkema E (2006). Lessons learned from unsuccessful modelling interventions. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 23 (4): 483–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fildes R and Ranyard JC (1997). Success and survival of operational research groups—A review. Journal of the Operational Research Society 48 (4): 336–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fone D et al (2003). Systematic review of the use and value of computer simulation modelling in population health and health care delivery. Journal of Public Health Medicine 25 (4): 325–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh T and Peacock R (2005). Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: Audit of primary sources. British Medical Journal 331 (7524): 1064–1065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh T, Potts HWW, Wong G, Bark P and Swinglehurst D (2009). Tensions and paradoxes in electronic patient record research: A systematic literature review using the meta-narrative method. Milbank Quarterly 87 (4): 729–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper PR and Pitt MA (2004). On the challenges of healthcare modelling and a proposed project life cycle for successful implementation. Journal of the Operational Research Society 55 (6): 657–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollocks BW (2001). Discrete-event simulation: An inquiry into user practice. Simulation Practice and Theory 8 (6–7): 451–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa K (1982). Guide to Quality Control. Asian Productivity Organization: Tokyo, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahangirian M and Taylor PM (2009). RIGHT Consolidated Exemplar Report. Brunel University: UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahangirian M, Eldabi T, Naseer A, Stergioulas LK and Young T (2010a). Simulation in manufacturing and business: A review. European Journal of Operational Research 203 (1): 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahangirian M, Taylor SJE and Young T (2010b). Economics of modeling and simulation: Reflections and implications for healthcare. In: Johansson B, Jain S, Montoya-Torres J, Hugan J and Yucesan E (eds). Proceedings of the 2010 Winter Simulation Conference, IEEE; Baltimore, MD, pp 2283–2292.

  • Jahangirian M et al (2011). A rapid review method for extremely large corpora of literature: Applications to the domains of modelling, simulation, and management. International Journal of Information Management 31 (3): 234–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahangirian M et al (2012). Simulation in health-care: Lessons from other sectors. Operational Research, An International Journal 12 (1): 45–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins R, Deshpande Y and Davison G (1998). Verification and validation and complex environments: A study in service sector. In: Medeiros DJ, Watson EF, Carson JS and Manivannan MS (eds). Proceedings of the 1998 Winter Simulation Conference, IEEE; Washington, DC, pp 1433–1440.

  • Joumard I, André C, Nicq C and Chatal O (2008). Health status determinants: Lifestyle, environment, health care resources and efficiency. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 627. OECD Publishing, doi: 10.1787/240858500130.

  • Levasseur RE (2007). People skills: Marketing OR/MS—A people problem. Interfaces 37 (4): 383–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levasseur RE (2010). People skills: Ensuring project success—A change management perspective. Interfaces 40 (2): 159–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowery JC, Hakes B, Keller L, Lilegdon WR, Mabrouk K and McGuire F (1994). Barriers to implementing simulation in health care. In: Tew JD, Manivannan S, Sadowski DA and Seila AF (eds). Proceedings of the 1994 Winter Simulation Conference, IEEE; Lake Buena Vista, FL, pp 868–875.

  • McClean S, Barton M, Garg L and Fullerton K (2011). A modeling framework that combines Markov models and discrete-event simulation for stroke patient care. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation (TOMACS) 21 (4): 25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melão N and Pidd M (2003). Use of business process simulation: A survey of practitioners. Journal of the Operational Research Society 54 (1): 2–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy SP and Perera T (2002). Successes and failures in UK/US development of simulation. Simulation Practice and Theory 9 (6–8): 333–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pannirselvam GP, Ferguson LA, Ash RC and Siferd SP (1999). Operations management research: An update for the 1990s. Journal of Operations Management 18 (1): 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plsek PE and Greenhalgh T (2001). The challenge of complexity in health care. British Medical Journal 323 (7313): 625–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts SD, Maxwell DR and Gross TL (1980). Cost-effective care of end-stage renal disease: A billion dollar question. Annals of Internal Medicine 92 (2-I): 243–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson S (1994). Successful Simulation: A Practical Approach to Simulation Projects. McGraw-Hill: Maidenhead, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson S and Pidd M (1998). Provider and customer expectations of successful simulation projects. Journal of the Operational Research Society 49 (3): 200–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shokri-Ghasabeh M and Kavoousi-Chabok K (2009). Generic project success and project management success criteria and factors: Literature review and survey. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics 6 (8): 456–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sud VP et al (2009). Reducing flight delays through better traffic management. Interfaces 39 (1): 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor SJE, Eldabi T, Riley G, Paul RJ and Pidd M (2009). Simulation modelling is 50! Do we need a reality check? Journal of the Operational Research Society 60 (suppl. 1): S69–S82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the EPSRC, UK (Grant No: EP/E019900/1; and Grant no: GR/S29874/01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK

    Mohsen Jahangirian, Simon J E Taylor, Julie Eatock, Lampros K Stergioulas & Peter M Taylor

Authors
  1. Mohsen Jahangirian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Simon J E Taylor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Julie Eatock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lampros K Stergioulas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Peter M Taylor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jahangirian, M., Taylor, S., Eatock, J. et al. Causal study of low stakeholder engagement in healthcare simulation projects. J Oper Res Soc 66, 369–379 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2014.1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2014.1

Keywords

Search

Navigation