Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Inefficiency countervailed DEA (IC-DEA) method for assessing corporate environmental performance

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a method frequently used to evaluate relative firm performance. However, high values in a few indicators can lead to a company being regarded as ‘efficient’, despite valuing poorly in other essential indicators. The Inefficiency Countervailed DEA (IC-DEA) method is thus developed. The method first defines an inefficient frontier using the proposed Reverse DEA (RDEA) model. An IC-DEA value is then determined by summing both the DEA and RDEA values. The IC-DEA method was applied to assess the environmental performance of major opto-electronic companies in Taiwan, demonstrating its applicability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alsharif K, Feroz EH, Klemer A and Raab R (2008). Governance of water supply systems in the Palestinian territories: A data envelopment analysis approach to the management of water resources. J Environ Mngt 87: 80–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angulo Meza L and Estellita Lins MP (2002). Review of methods for increasing discrimination in data envelopment analysis. Ann Opns Res 116: 225–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angulo Meza L, Biondi Neto L, Soares de Mello JCCB and Gomes EG (2005). ISYDS—Integrated system for decision support (SIAD Sistema Integrado de Apoio a Decisão): A software package for data envelopment analysis model. Pesqui Oper 25: 493–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW and Rhodes E (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Opl Res 2: 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Huang ZM and Sun DB (1990). Polyhedral cone-ratio DEA models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks. J Econometrics 46: 73–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi-Mei Corporation (2009). Corporate social responsibility report 2008. Chi-Mei Corporation: Tainan, R.O.C.

  • Dyson RG and Thanassoulis E (1988). Reducting weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis. J Opl Res Soc 39: 563–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entani T, Maeda Y and Tanaka H (2002). Dual models of interval DEA and its extension to interval data. Eur J Opl Res 136: 32–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK and Pasurka C (1989). Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: A nonparametric approach. Rev Econ Stat 71 (1): 90–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feroz EH, Raab RL, Ulleberg GT and Alsharif K (2009). Global warming and environmental production efficiency ranking of the Kyoto Protocol nations. J Environ Mngt 90: 1178–1183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes EG and Estellita Lins MP (2008). Modelling undesirable outputs with zero sum gains data envelopment analysis models. J Opl Res Soc 59: 616–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HP (2008). Global citizenship customer report 2008. Hewlett-Packard Development Company: Texas, USA.

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2001). IPCC third assessment Report: Climate change 2001. Working Group I: The Scientific Basis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York: NY, USA.

  • Lansink AO and Bezlepkin I (2003). The effect of heating technologies on CO2 and energy efficiency of Dutch greenhouse firms. J Environ Mngt 68: 73–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li CI (2006). Introduction of Energy Consumption Indicators for Industries in Taiwan. Industrial Development Bureau Ministry of Economic Affairs: Taipei, R.O.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu IC (2003). Analysis of correlation between energy consumption and pollutant emission for industries in Taiwan. Master Thesis, Department of Environmental Engineering, National Cheng Kung University: Tainan, R.O.C.

  • Lu WM and Lo SF (2007). A benchmark-learning roadmap for regional sustainable development in China. J Opl Res Soc 58: 841–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moneva JM and Ortas E (2010). Corporate environmental and financial performance: A multivariate approach. Ind Mngt Data Syst 110 (2): 193–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakashima K, Nose T and Kuriyama S (2006). A new approach to environmental- performance evaluation. Int J Prod Res 44 (18–19): 4137–4143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedraja-Chaparro R, Salinas-Jimenes J and Smith P (1997). On the role of weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis. J Prod Anal 8: 215–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan R (2005). Estimating energy consumption of transport modes in India using DEA and application to energy and environmental policy. J Opl Res Soc 56: 832–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ROCEPA (2009). 2009 Yearbook of Environmental Statistics. Environmental Protection Administration, Executive Yuan: Taipei, R.O.C.

  • ROCEY (2009). The Republic of China Yearbook 2008. Government Information Office, Executive Yuan: Taipei, R.O.C.

  • Sarkis J (2000). A comparative analysis of DEA as a discrete alternative multiple criteria decision tool. Eur J Opl Res 123: 543–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiford LM and Thrall RM (1990). Recent developments in DEA: The mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis. J Econometrics 46: 7–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sexton TR, Silkman RH and Hogan AJ (1986). Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions. New Dir Program Eval 32: 73–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sony (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility Report 2008. Sony Corporation: Japan.

  • Thompson RG, Singleton FD Jr, Thrall RM and Smith BA (1986). Comparative site evaluations for locating a high-energy physics lab in Texas. Interfaces 16 (6): 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyteca D (1997). Linear programming models for the measurement of environmental performance of firms: Concepts and empirical results. J Prod Anal 8: 183–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu RH and Hong DL (2008). Energy management policy for industries. In: Hong DS (ed). Energy Monthly. Vol. 10. Bureau of Energy, Ministry of Economic Affairs: Taipei, R.O.C, pp 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamada Y, Matui T and Sugiyama M (1994). New analysis of efficiency based on DEA. J Opns Res Soc Jpn 37: 158–167, (In Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zofio JL and Prieto AM (2001). Environmental efficiency and regulatory standards: The case of CO2 emissions from OECD industries. Resour Energy Econ 23: 63–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the National Science Council, Taiwan, R.O.C. for partially supporting this research under Grant No. NSC96-2221-E-009-056-MY3.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, People's Republic of China

    Y-T Huang & J-J Kao

Authors
  1. Y-T Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J-J Kao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J-J Kao.

Additional information

Corporate environmental performance (CEP) assessment has become an important task worldwide. The DEA method is thus frequently applied to evaluate relative firm performance based on multiple inputs and outputs. However, high values in a few indicators can lead to a company being regarded as ‘efficient,’ despite valuing poorly in other essential indicators. To resolve such problems, the Reverse-DEA (RDEA) model is proposed to determine the inefficient frontier and identify companies that are not truly efficient. Then, an IC-DEA value is computed by summing both the DEA and RDEA values for comparing CEP among companies. The proposed IC-DEA method improves the original DEA method by simultaneously considering both the efficiency and inefficiency frontiers to provide an unbiased method for assessing relative CEP.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, YT., Kao, JJ. Inefficiency countervailed DEA (IC-DEA) method for assessing corporate environmental performance. J Oper Res Soc 63, 470–477 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2011.56

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2011.56

Keywords

Search

Navigation